Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 33, Issue 10, pp 1774–1779 | Cite as

Workforce Configurations to Provide High-Quality, Comprehensive Primary Care: a Mixed-Method Exploration of Staffing for Four Types of Primary Care Practices

  • David MeyersEmail author
  • Lisa LeRoy
  • Michael Bailit
  • Judith Schaefer
  • Edward Wagner
  • Chunliu Zhan
Article

Abstract

Background

Broad consensus exists about the value and principles of primary care; however, little is known about the workforce configurations required to deliver it.

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore the team configurations and associated costs required to deliver high-quality, comprehensive primary care.

Methods

We used a mixed-method and consensus-building process to develop staffing models based on data from 73 exemplary practices, findings from 8 site visits, and input from an expert panel. We first defined high-quality, comprehensive primary care and explicated the specific functions needed to deliver it. We translated the functions into full-time-equivalent staffing requirements for a practice serving a panel of 10,000 adults and then revised the models to reflect the divergent needs of practices serving older adults, patients with higher social needs, and a rural community. Finally, we estimated the labor and overhead costs associated with each model.

Results

A primary care practice needs a mix of 37 team members, including 8 primary care providers (PCPs), at a cost of $45 per patient per month (PPPM), to provide comprehensive primary care to a panel of 10,000 actively managed adults. A practice requires a team of 52 staff (including 12 PCPs) at $64 PPPM to care for a panel of 10,000 adults with a high proportion of older patients, and 50 staff (with 10 PCPs) at $56 PPPM for a panel of 10,000 with high social needs. In rural areas, a practice needs 22 team members (with 4 PCPs) at $46 PPPM to serve a panel of 5000 adults.

Conclusions

Our estimates provide health care decision-makers with needed guideposts for considering primary care staffing and financing and inform broader discussions on primary care innovations and the necessary resources to provide high-quality, comprehensive primary care in the USA.

KEY WORDS

primary care workforce team-based care health care delivery 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the valuable contributions of all participating primary care practices who contributed staffing data, expert panel members who offered critical input in the model development process, and Robert McNellis, Janice Genevro, Theodore Ganiats, and Richard Ricciardi of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) for their valuable comments. Special thanks also to MaryJoan Ladden and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation for providing access to data and insights from the Learning from Effective Ambulatory Practices project.

Funders

This manuscript is based on the research conducted by researchers at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and Abt Associates in partnership with the MacColl Center for Health Care Innovation and Bailit Health, LLC, under an AHRQ contract (Contract Nos. 290-2010-00004-I/290-32009-T). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Prior Presentations

This work was previous presented partially at the Academy Health Research Meeting in Boston, Massachusetts, on June 2016; at the American Public Health Association meeting in Denver, Coronado, on November 1, 2016; and at the Academy Health Research Meeting in New Orleans, Louisiana, on June 25, 2017.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11606_2018_4530_MOESM1_ESM.docx (732 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 732 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bodenheimer T, Ghorob A, Willard-Grace R, Grumbach K. The 10 building blocks of high-performing primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(2):166–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Institute of Medicine. Primary Care: America’s Health in a New Era. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ellner AL, Phillips RS. The coming primary care revolution. J Gen Intern Med. 2017; 32(4):380–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    World Health Organization. Primary Health Care: Now More Than Ever. Geneva: WHO; 2008.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative. Shared principles of primary care: moving the United States toward a vibrant future of person-centered, team-based, and community aligned primary care. Available at: https://www.pcpcc.org/about/shared-principles. Accessed May 11, 2018.
  7. 7.
    Ghorob A, Bodenheimer T. Share the care: building teams in primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(2):143–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grumbach K, Olayiwola JN. Patient empanelment: the importance of understanding who is at home in the medical home. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28(2):170–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patel MS, Arron MJ, Sinsky TA, Green EH, Baker DW, Bowen JL, et al. Estimating the staffing infrastructure for a patient-centered medical home. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(6):509–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedman A, Hahn KA, Etz R, Rehwinkel-Morfe AM, et al. A typology of primary care workforce innovations in the United States since 2000. Med Care. 2014;52(2):101–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ladden MD, Bodenheimer T, Fishman NW, et al. The emerging primary care workforce: preliminary observations from the primary care team: learning from effective ambulatory practices project. Acad Med. 2013;88(12):1830–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bodenheimer T, Willard-Grace R. Teamlets in primary care: enhancing the patient and clinician experience. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(1):135–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Balasa DA. New roles for the certified medical assistant to enhance quality and effectiveness of care. J Med Pract Manage. 2008;23(5):276–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bodenheimer T, Bauer L. Rethinking the primary care workforce—an expanded role for nurses. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375:1015–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reiss-Brennan B, Brunisholz KD, Dredge C, et al. Association of integrated team-based care with health care quality, utilization, and cost. JAMA. 2016;316(8):826–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sinsky CA, Willard-Grace R, Schutzbank AM, et al. In search of joy in practice: a report of 23 high-functioning primary care practices. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(3):272–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jabbarpour Y, DeMarchis E, Bazemore A, Grundy P. The impact of primary care practice transformation on cost, quality and utilization: a systematic review of research published in 2016. Available at: https://www.milbank.org/news/patient-centered-primary-care-collaborative-publishes-new-evidence-report/. Accessed May 11, 2018.
  18. 18.
    Bauer MS, Leader D, Un H, Lai Z, Kilbourne AM. Primary care and behavioral health practice size: the challenge for healthcare reform. Med Care. 2012; 50(10): 843–8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hing E, Burt CW. Characteristics of office-based physicians and their medical practices: United States, 2005-2006. . National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 13(166). 2008.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lau DT, McCaig LF, Hing E. Toward a more complete picture of outpatient, office-based health care in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2016. 51(3):403–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peikes DN, Reid RJ, Day TJ, et al. Staffing patterns of primary care practices in the comprehensive primary care initiative. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(2):142–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Primary care transformation. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/primary-care/tpc/index.html. Accessed May 11, 2018.
  23. 23.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Redefining primary care for the 21st century. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/primary-care/workforce-financing/white-paper.html. Accessed May 11, 2018.
  24. 24.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ new models of primary care workforce and financing. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/primary-care-research/workforce-financing/exec-summary.html. Accessed May 11, 2018.
  25. 25.
    Angstman KB, Horn JL, Bernard ME, et al. Family medicine panel size with care teams: impact on quality. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(4):444–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Raffoul M, Moore M, Kamerow D, Bazemore A. A primary care panel size of 2500 is neither accurate nor reasonable. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(4):496–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ortman JM, Velkoff VA, Hogan H. An aging nation: the older population in the United States: population estimates and projections, 2014. Available at: https://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1140.pdf. Accessed May 11, 2018.
  28. 28.
    Bureau of Labor Statistics. May 2015 national occupational employment and wage estimates. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm. Accessed May 14, 2018.
  29. 29.
    Peckham C. Physician compensation report 2015. Available at: http://www.medscape.com/sites/public/physician-comp/2015. Accessed May 11, 2018.
  30. 30.
    Peckham C. Medscape nurse salary report 2015. Available at: http://www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/public/nurse-salary-report-2015. Accessed May 11, 2016.
  31. 31.
    Peckham C. Clinical and office staff salary report 2015. Available at: http://www.medscape.com/features/slideshow/public/staff-salary-report-2015#page=1. Accessed May 11, 2018.
  32. 32.
    Basu S, Phillips RS, Bitton A, Song Z, Landon BE. Medicare chronic care management payments and financial returns to primary care practices: a modeling study. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:580–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Goroll AH, Bwewnson RA, Schoenbaum SC, Gardner LB. Fundamental reform of payment for adult primary care: comprehensive payment for comprehensive care. J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22(3):410–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Medical Group Management Association. MGMA Cost Survey for Primary Care Practices: 2014 Report Based on 2013 Data. Glacier Publishing Services, Inc.; 2014.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Muhlestein DB, Smith NJ. Physician consolidation: rapid movement from small to large group practices, 2013-2015. Health Aff. 35(9): 1638–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Murray M, Davies M, Boushon B. Panel size: how many patients can one doctor manage? Fam Pract Manag. 2007;14(4):44–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Altschuler J, Margolius D, Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K. Estimating a reasonable patient panel size for primary care physicians with team-based task delegation. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(5):396–400.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oregon Health Authority and the Department of Consumer and Business Services. Primary care spending in Oregon, 2014. Available at: http://www.oregon.gov/oha/HPA/CSI-PCPCH/Documents/2017%20SB231_Primary-Care-Spending-in-Oregon-Report-to-the-Legislature.pdf. Accessed May 11, 2018.
  39. 39.
    Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. National health expenditures 2015 highlights. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/highlights.pdf. Accessed May11, 2018.
  40. 40.
    Bailit MH, Friedberg MW, Houy ML. Standardizing the measurement of commercial health plan primary care spending. Available at: https://www.milbank.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/MMF-Primary-Care-Spending-Report.pdf. Accessed May11, 2018.
  41. 41.
    Watkins LD. Aligning payers and practices to transform primary care: a report from the multi-state collaborative. Available at: https://www.milbank.org/publications/aligning-payers-and-practices-to-transform-primary-care-a-report-from-the-multi-state-collaborative/ . Accessed May 11, 2018.
  42. 42.
    Phillips RL, Green LA, Fryer GE, Dovey SM. Uncoordinated growth of the primary care work force. Am Fam Physician. 2001;64(9):1498.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Petterson SM, Liaw WR, Phillips RL Jr, et al. Projecting US primary care physician workforce needs: 2010-2025. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(6):503–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Petterson SM, Phillips RL Jr, Bazemore AW, Koinis GT. Unequal distribution of the U.S. primary care workforce. Am Fam Physician. 2013 1;87(11). Available at: http://www.aafp.org/afp/2013/0601/od1.pdf. Accessed May 11, 2018.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Auerbach DI, Chen PG, Friedberg MW, et al. Nurse-managed health centers and patient-centered medical homes could mitigate expected primary care physician shortage. Health Aff. 2013;32(11):1933–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bodenheimer TS, Smith MD. Primary care: proposed solutions to the physician shortage without training more physicians. Health Aff. 2013;32(11):1881–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine (This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Meyers
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lisa LeRoy
    • 2
  • Michael Bailit
    • 3
  • Judith Schaefer
    • 4
  • Edward Wagner
    • 4
  • Chunliu Zhan
    • 1
  1. 1.Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityRockvilleUSA
  2. 2.Abt AssociatesBostonUSA
  3. 3.Bailit HealthNeedhamUSA
  4. 4.MacColl Center for Health Care InnovationSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations