Shopping on the Public and Private Health Insurance Marketplaces: Consumer Decision Aids and Plan Presentation
The design of the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) health insurance marketplaces influences complex health plan choices.
To compare the choice environments of the public health insurance exchanges in the fourth (OEP4) versus third (OEP3) open enrollment period and to examine online marketplace run by private companies, including a total cost estimate comparison.
In November–December 2016, we examined the public and private online health insurance exchanges. We navigated each site for “real-shopping” (personal information required) and “window-shopping” (no required personal information).
Public (n = 13; 12 state-based marketplaces and HealthCare.gov) and private (n = 23) online health insurance exchanges.
Features included consumer decision aids (e.g., total cost estimators, provider lookups) and plan display (e.g., order of plans). We examined private health insurance exchanges for notable features (i.e., those not found on public exchanges) and compared the total cost estimates on public versus private exchanges for a standardized consumer.
Nearly all studied consumer decision aids saw increased deployment in the public marketplaces in OEP4 compared to OEP3. Over half of the public exchanges (n = 7 of 13) had total cost estimators (versus 5 of 14 in OEP3) in window-shopping and integrated provider lookups (window-shopping: 7; real-shopping: 8). The most common default plan orders were by premium or total cost estimate. Notable features on private health insurance exchanges were unique data presentation (e.g., infographics) and further personalized shopping (e.g., recommended plan flags). Health plan total cost estimates varied substantially between the public and private exchanges (average difference $1526).
The ACA’s public health insurance exchanges offered more tools in OEP4 to help consumers select a plan. While private health insurance exchanges presented notable features, the total cost estimates for a standardized consumer varied widely on public versus private exchanges.
KEY WORDShealth insurance marketplace Affordable Care Act consumerism health insurance decision support
Funding for this project was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Tom Baker is a co-founder of Picwell, Inc., a health information/technology company that leverages big data and predictive analytics to help consumers optimize health plan choice. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Presented as a poster at the AcademyHealth Research Meeting, June 2017 in New Orleans, Louisiana.
- 1.Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Health insurance marketplaces 2017 open enrollment period final enrollment report: November 1, 2016-January 31, 2017 2017. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Fact-sheets/2017-Fact-Sheet-items/2017-03-15.html. Accessed 18 March 2018.
- 2.Politi MC, Kaphingst KA, Kreuter M, Shacham E, Lovell MC, McBride T. Knowledge of health insurance terminology and details among the uninsured. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;71(1):85-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558713505327.
- 6.Ubel PA, Comerford DA, Johnson E. Healthcare.gov 3.0—behavioral economics and insurance exchanges. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):695–8.
- 10.Wong C, Nirenburg G, Polsky D, Town R, Baker T. Insurance plan presentation and decision support on HealthCare.gov and state-based web sites created for the Affordable Care Act. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(4):327–8.
- 12.Hempstead K. Consumer decision support on the individual market will be more important than ever. Health Affairs Blog. 2017. Available from: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2017/01/31/consumer-decision-support-on-the-individual-market-will-be-more-important-than-ever/. Accessed 18 March 2018.
- 13.Antos J, Capretta J. The President’s executive order: less than meets the eye? Health Affairs Blog. 2017. Available from: https://www.healthaffairs.org/action/showDoPubSecure?doi=10.1377%2Fhblog20171020.496593&format=full. Accessed 18 March 2018.
- 14.Kaiser Family Foundation. State health insurance marketplace types. 2017. Available from: http://kff.org/health-reform/state-indicator/state-health-insurance-marketplace-types/. Accessed 18 March 2018.
- 15.Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Web-broker public list 2016. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Programs-and-Initiatives/Health-Insurance-Marketplaces/Downloads/Public-2016-WBE-List-20160106.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2017.
- 18.Smith A, Anderson M. Online shopping and E-commerce. 2016. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/12/19/online-shopping-and-e-commerce/. Accessed 18 March 2018.
- 20.Rao A, White J, Hewitt P. 2017 Health insurance exchanges: the good, the bad and the ugly. Clear Choice. 2017. Available from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/547e0e88e4b0d4a9ddc29e99/t/588fbb32a5790a510d07a99f/1485814602279/CC+2017+HIX+Report+Final.pdf. Accessed 18 March 2018.
- 22.Wong CA, Kan K, Cidav Z, Nathenson R, Polsky D. Pediatric and adult physician networks in Affordable Care Act marketplace plans. Pediatrics. 2017;139(4). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3117.
- 26.Pacific Business Group on Health. Supporting consumers' decisions in the exchange. Available from: http://www.pbgh.org/key-strategies/engaging-consumers/216-supporting-consumers-decisions-in-the-exchange. Accessed 18 March 2018.
- 27.Benedict GC, Baker T. Regulating robo advice across the financial services. Iowa Law Review. 2018;103(forthcoming).Google Scholar