Pay-for-Performance and Veteran Care in the VHA and the Community: a Systematic Review
Although pay-for-performance (P4P) strategies have been used by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) for over a decade, the long-term benefits of P4P are unclear. The use of P4P is further complicated by the increased use of non-VHA healthcare providers as part of the Veterans Choice Program. We conducted a systematic review and key informant interviews to better understand the effectiveness and potential unintended consequences of P4P, as well as the implementation factors and design features important in both VHA and non-VHA/community settings.
We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL through March 2017 and reviewed reference lists. We included trials and observational studies of P4P targeting Veteran health. Two investigators abstracted data and assessed study quality. We interviewed VHA stakeholders to gain further insight.
The literature search yielded 1031 titles and abstracts, of which 30 studies met pre-specified inclusion criteria. Twenty-five examined P4P in VHA settings and 5 in community settings. There was no strong evidence supporting the effectiveness of P4P in VHA settings. Interviews with 17 key informants were consistent with studies that identified the potential for overtreatment associated with performance metrics in the VHA. Key informants’ views on P4P in community settings included the need to develop relationships with providers and health systems with records of strong performance, to improve coordination by targeting documentation and data sharing processes, and to troubleshoot the limited impact of P4P among practices where Veterans make up a small fraction of the patient population.
The evidence to support the effectiveness of P4P on Veteran health is limited. Key informants recognize the potential for unintended consequences, such as overtreatment in VHA settings, and suggest that implementation of P4P in the community focus on relationship building and target areas such as documentation and coordination of care.
KEY WORDSVeterans pay for performance financial incentives implementation performance metrics systematic review
We would like to acknowledge Rose Relevo for conducting literature searches and also the contributions of our stakeholders and Technical Expert Panel.
The contents of this manuscript have not been presented at any conference.
This project was funded by the US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration (VHA) ESP Project #05-225.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 1.Senate: Veterans' Affairs Committee. S. 2484 (108th Congress): Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care Personnel Enhancement Act of 2004. December 3 2004.Google Scholar
- 3.Kondo K, Damberg C, Mendelson A, et al. Understanding the Intervention and Implementation Factors Associated with Benefits and Harms of Pay for Performance Programs in Healthcare. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs;2015.Google Scholar
- 6.Department of Veterans Affairs. VHA Office of Community Care. Available at https://www.va.gov/purchasedcare/. Accessed 24 March 2017.
- 7.Commission on Care. Final Report of the Commission on Care. 2016.Google Scholar
- 8.Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. 2011; http://handbook.cochrane.org/. Accessed 24 March 2017.
- 9.Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Available at http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 24 March 2017.
- 12.Berkman N, Lohr K, Ansari M, et al. Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update. 2013. http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/457/1752/methods-guidance-grading-evidence-131118.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2016.
- 20.Prentice J, Legler A, Li D, Pizer SD. Optimizing Access Metrics in the VA. https://www.hsrdresearchvagov/for_researchers/cyber_seminars/archives/1166-notes.pdf .
- 30.Petersen LA, Ramos KS, Pietz K, Woodard LD. Impact of a Pay-for-Performance Program on Care for Black Patients with Hypertension: Important Answers in the Era of the Affordable Care Act. Health Serv Res 2016.Google Scholar