Correlates of Use and Perceived Effectiveness of Non-pharmacologic Strategies for Chronic Pain Among Patients Prescribed Long-term Opioid Therapy

  • Crystal C. Lozier
  • Shannon M. Nugent
  • Ning X. Smith
  • Bobbi Jo Yarborough
  • Steven K. Dobscha
  • Richard A. Deyo
  • Benjamin J. Morasco
Original Research

Abstract

Objective

Non-pharmacologic treatments (NPTs) are recommended for chronic pain. Information is limited on patient use or perceptions of NPTs. We examined the frequency and correlates of use and self-rated helpfulness of NPTs for chronic pain among patients who are prescribed long-term opioid therapy (LTOT).

Methods

Participants (n = 517) with musculoskeletal pain who were prescribed LTOT were recruited from two integrated health systems. They rated the frequency and utility of six clinician-directed and five self-directed NPTs for chronic pain. We categorized NPT use at four levels based on number of interventions used and frequency of use (none, low, moderate, high). Analyses examined clinical and demographic factors that differed among groups for both clinician-directed and self-directed NPTs.

Results

Seventy-one percent of participants reported use of any NPT for pain within the prior 6 months. NPTs were rated as being helpful by more than 50% of users for all treatments assessed (range 51–79%). High users of clinician-directed NPTs were younger than non-users or low-frequency users and had the most depressive symptoms. In both clinician-directed and self-directed categories, high NPT users had significantly higher pain disability compared to non-NPT users. No significant group differences were detected on other demographic or clinical variables. In multivariable analyses, clinician-directed NPT use was modestly associated with younger age (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.96–0.98) and higher pain disability (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.00–1.02). Variables associated with greater self-directed NPT use were some college education (OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.13–2.84), college graduate or more (OR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.20–3.40), and higher pain disability (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 1.01–1.02).

Conclusions

NPT use was associated with higher pain disability and younger age for both clinician-directed and self-directed NPTs and higher education for self-directed NPTs. These strategies were rated as helpful by those that used them. These results can inform intervention implementation and be used to increase engagement in NPTs for chronic pain.

KEY WORDS

chronic pain non-pharmacologic pain management long-term opioid therapy 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Study procedures were reviewed, approved, and monitored by Institutional Review Boards at both study settings. All participants provided written informed consent to participate.

Conflict of Interest

Research reported in this manuscript was supported by grant 034083 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Lozier was funded in part by Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center at the VA Portland Health Care System. The work was also supported by resources from the VA Health Services Research and Development-funded Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care at the VA Portland Health Care System (CIN 13-404). Dr. Yarborough has received grant support from Purdue Pharma LP, and the Industry PMR Consortium, a consortium of 10 companies working together to conduct FDA-required post-marketing studies that assess known risks related to extended-release, long-acting opioid analgesics. Dr. Deyo receives royalties from UpToDate for authoring topics on low back pain. He received a financial award from NuVasive, as part of a lifetime achievement award from the International Society for Study of the Lumbar Spine. No other author reports having any potential conflict of interest with this study. The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

References

  1. 1.
    Institute of Medicine. Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deyo, RA, Von Korff M, Duhrkoop D. Opioids for low back pain. BMJ. 2015;350:g6380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chou R, Turner JA, Devine EB, et al. The effectiveness and risks of long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain: A systematic review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:276-286.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain-United States. JAMA. 2016;315:1624-1645.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang, KL Fillingim, R, Hurley, RW, Schmidt, S. Chronic pain management: Nonpharmacological therapies for chronic pain. FP Essentials. 2015;432:21-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beumer L, Wong J, Warden SJ, et al. Effects of exercise and manual therapy on pain associated with hip osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(8):458-463.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheng CH, Su HT, Yen LW, et al. Long-term effects of therapeutic exercise on nonspecific chronic neck pain: A literature review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;27(4):1271-1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, Skelly A, et al. Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann of Intern Med. 2017; 166(7):493-505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fransen M, McConnell S, Hernandez-Molina G, et al. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4:CD007912.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gomes-Neto M, Lopes JM, Conceição CS, et al. Stabilization exercise compared to general exercises or manual therapy for the management of low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport. 2017;23:136-142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haik MN, Alburquerque-Sendin F, Moreira RF, et al. Effectiveness of physical therapy treatment of clearly defined subacromial pain: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(18):1124-1134.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cramer, H, Klose, P, Brinkhaus, B, Michalsen, A, Dobos, G. Effects of yoga on chronic neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehab. 2017;0269215517698735.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crawford, C, Boyd, C, Paat, CF, Price, A, Xenakis, L, Yang, E. Evidence for massage therapy (EMT) working group. The impact of massage therapy on function in pain populations-A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: Part I, patients experiencing pain in the general population. Pain Medicine. 2016;17:1353-1375.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jonas WB, Schoomaker E, Berry K, Buckenmaier III C. A time for massage. Pain Medicine 2016;1–2.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Furlan AD, Giraldo M, Baskwill A, Irvin E, Imamura M. Massage for low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2015;1(9):CD001929.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vranceanu, AM, Stone, M, Wallace, T, Kulich, R. Cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain. in the Massachusetts General Hospital Handbook of Behavioral Medicine. Springer Int Publ. 2017;93–114.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Law D, McDonough S, Bleakley C, Baxter GD, Tumilty, S. Laser acupuncture for treating musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2015; 8(1):2-16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Manheimer E, White A, Berman B, et al. Meta-analysis: Acupuncture for low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(8):651-663.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vickers, AJ, Cronin, AM, Maschino, AC, Lewith, G, Macpherson, H, Victor, N, Linde, K. Individual patient data meta-analysis of acupuncture for chronic pain: protocol of the Acupuncture Trialists' Collaboration. Trials. 2010;11, 90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hall A, Copsey B, Richmond H, et al. Effectiveness of Tai Chi for chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2017;97(2):227-238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jiang D, Kong W, Jiang J. The role of Tai Chi in mental health management—Lessons learned from clinical trials. Reviews on recent clinical trials. 2016;11:324-32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tousignant-Laflamme, Y, Laroche, C, Beaulieu, C, Bouchard, AJ, Boucher, S, Michaud-Létourneau, M. A randomized trial to determine the duration of analgesia following a 15-and a 30-minute application of acupuncture-like TENS on patients with chronic low back pain. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2017;1-9.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ely S. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) at acupuncture points for the management of chronic pain: A narrative review. Physiotherapy. 2016; 102:e90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khadilkar A, Odebiyi DO, Brosseau L, et al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;8(4): CD003008.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Qaseem A, Wilt T, McLean R, Forciea MA. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann of Intern Med. 2017; 166(7):514-530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Martin BI, Gerkovich MM, Deyo RA, et al. The association of complementary and alternative medicine use and health care expenditures for back and neck problems. Med Care. 2012;50(12):1029-1036.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hu XY, Chen NN, Chai QY, et al. Integrative treatment for low back pain: An exploratory systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Chin J Integr Med. 2015;1–3.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Denneson LM, Corson K, Dobscha SK. Complementary and alternative medicine use among Veterans with chronic noncancer pain. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(9):1119-1128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fleming S, Rabago DP, Mundt MP, Fleming MF. CAM therapies among primary care patients using opioid therapy for chronic pain. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007;16:7-15.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sherman KJ, Cherkin DC, Connelly MT, et al. Complementary and alternative medical therapies for chronic low back pain: What treatments are patients willing to try? BMC Complement Altern Med. 2004;19:4-9.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Barnes PM, Bloom B, Nahin RL. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008;12:1-23.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dart RC, Surratt HL, Cicero TJ, et al. Trends in opioid analgesic abuse and mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:241-248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Frieden TR, Houry D. Reducing the risks of relief: The CDC opioid-prescribing guideline. N Engl J Med. 2016;in press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lovejoy TI, Morasco BJ, Demidenko MI, et al. Reasons for discontinuation of long-term opioid therapy in patients with and without substance use disorders. Pain. 2017;158:526-534.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Morasco BJ, Yarborough BJ, Smith NX, et al. Higher prescription opioid dose is associated with worse patient-reported pain outcomes and more health care utilization. J Pain. 2017;18(4):437-445.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gureje O, Von Korff M, Simon GE, et al. Persistent pain and wellbeing: A World Health Organization study in primary care. JAMA. 1998;280:145-151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Edlund MJ, Steffick D, Hudson T, et al. Risk factors for clinically recognized opioid abuse and dependence among Veterans using opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. Pain. 2007;(129):355-362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Von Korff M, Saunders K, Ray G, et al. De facto long-term opioid therapy for non-cancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2008;24:521–527.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Astin JA. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JAMA. 1998;279(19):1548-1553.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock, FE, Calkins DR, Delbanco TL. Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(4):246-252.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kessler RC, Davis RB, Foster DF, et al. Long-term trends in the use of complementary and alternative medical therapies in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(4): 262-268.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    DeBar LL, Elder C, Ritenbaugh C, Aickin M, Deyo RA, Meenan R, Dickerson J, Webster JA, Yarborough BJ. Acupuncture and chiropractice care for chronic pain in an integrated health plan: A mixed methods study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011;11:118.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, et al. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain. 1992;50(2):133-149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Smith BH, Penny KI, Purves AM, et al. The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: Validation and reliability in postal research. Pain. 1997;71:141-147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Elliott AM, Smith BH, Smith WC, Chambers WA. Changes in chronic pain severity over time: The Chronic Pain Grade as a valid measure. Pain. 2000;88(3):303-308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nicholas, MK. The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: Taking pain into account. Eur J Pain. 2007;11:153-163.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatr Ann. 2002;32:509–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. JAMA. 1999;282:1737-1744.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606-613.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Arch of Intern Med. 2006; 166:10:1092-1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Monahan PO, Lowe B. Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146: 317-325.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonnel MB, et al. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C). Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1789-1795.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bradley KA, DeBenedetti AF, Volk RJ, Williams EC, Frank D, Kivlahan DR. AUDIT-C as a brief screen for alcohol misuse in primary care. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007;31:1208-1217.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Frank D, DeBenedetti AF, Volk RJ, Williams EC, Kivlahan DR, Bradley KA. Effectiveness of the AUDIT-C as a screening test for alcohol misuse in three race/ethnic groups. J Gen Int Med. 2008;23:781-787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Skinner HA. The Drug Abuse Screening Test. Addict Behav. 1982;7:363-371.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Cocco KM, Carey KB. Psychometric properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test in psychiatric outpatients. Psychol Assess. 1998;10:408-414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jonas WB, Eisenberg D, Hufford D, Crawford C. The evolution of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in the USA over the last 20 years. Forsch Komplementmed. 2013;20(1):65-72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Herman PM, Poindexter BL, Witt CM, Eisenberg DM. Are complementary therapies and integrative care cost-effective? A systematic review of economic evaluations. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5):e001046.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gaul C, Eismann R, Schmidt T, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients suffering from primary headache disorders. Cephalalgia. 2009;29:1069-1078.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sirois FM, Gick ML. An investigation of the health beliefs and motivations of complementary medicine clients. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:1025-1037.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hing E, Cherry DK, Woodwell DA. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 summary. Adv Data. 2006;1-33.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Luo X, Pietrobon R, Sun SX, et al. Estimates and patterns of direct health care expenditures among individuals with back pain in the United States. Spine. 2004;29:79-86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Coulter ID, Willis EM. The rise and rise of complementary and alternative medicine: A sociological perspective. Med J Austral. 2004;180(11):587-589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Nahin RL, Straus SE. Research into complementary and alternative medicine problems and potential. BMJ. 2001;322:161-164.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gore M, Sadosky A, Stacey BR, Tai KS, Leslie D. The burden of chronic low back pain: clinical comorbidities, treatment patterns, and health care costs in usual care settings. Spine. 2012;37:E668-E677.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Saper RB, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Culpepper L, Phillips RS. Prevalence and patterns of adult yoga use in the United States: Results of a national survey. Altern Ther Health Med. 2004;10:44-49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tindle HA, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Eisenberg DM. Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997–2002. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005;11:42-49.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine (outside the USA) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Crystal C. Lozier
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shannon M. Nugent
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ning X. Smith
    • 3
  • Bobbi Jo Yarborough
    • 3
  • Steven K. Dobscha
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard A. Deyo
    • 2
    • 3
  • Benjamin J. Morasco
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.VA Portland Health Care SystemPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Oregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  3. 3.Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health ResearchPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations