The Relationship Between Professional Burnout and Quality and Safety in Healthcare: A Meta-Analysis
Healthcare provider burnout is considered a factor in quality of care, yet little is known about the consistency and magnitude of this relationship. This meta-analysis examined relationships between provider burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment) and the quality (perceived quality, patient satisfaction) and safety of healthcare.
Publications were identified through targeted literature searches in Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses through March of 2015. Two coders extracted data to calculate effect sizes and potential moderators. We calculated Pearson’s r for all independent relationships between burnout and quality measures, using a random effects model. Data were assessed for potential impact of study rigor, outliers, and publication bias.
Eighty-two studies including 210,669 healthcare providers were included. Statistically significant negative relationships emerged between burnout and quality (r = −0.26, 95 % CI [−0.29, −0.23]) and safety (r = −0.23, 95 % CI [−0.28, −0.17]). In both cases, the negative relationship implied that greater burnout among healthcare providers was associated with poorer-quality healthcare and reduced safety for patients. Moderators for the quality relationship included dimension of burnout, unit of analysis, and quality data source. Moderators for the relationship between burnout and safety were safety indicator type, population, and country. Rigor of the study was not a significant moderator.
This is the first study to systematically, quantitatively analyze the links between healthcare provider burnout and healthcare quality and safety across disciplines. Provider burnout shows consistent negative relationships with perceived quality (including patient satisfaction), quality indicators, and perceptions of safety. Though the effects are small to medium, the findings highlight the importance of effective burnout interventions for healthcare providers. Moderator analyses suggest contextual factors to consider for future study.
KEY WORDSburnout quality of care healthcare outcomes meta-analysis
- 1.Maslach C. Burnout: a multidimensional perspective. In: Schaufeli WB, Maslach C, Marek T, eds. Professional burnout: recent developments in theory and research. Washington: Taylor & Francis; 1993:19–32.Google Scholar
- 11.Stalker C, Harvey C. Professional Burnout: A Review of Theory, Research, and Prevention. Wilfrid Laurier University; 2002.Google Scholar
- 16.Burke RJ, Richardsen AM. Psychological burnout in organizations. In: Golembiewski RT, ed. Handbook of organizational behavior. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1993.Google Scholar
- 17.Schwab RL, Jackson SE, Schuler RS. Educator burnout: sources and consequences. Educ Res Q. 1986;10:15–30.Google Scholar
- 31.Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. 3rd ed. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996.Google Scholar
- 32.Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928.
- 33.National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Hamilton: McMaster University; 2008.Google Scholar
- 39.Card NA. Applied meta-analysis for social science research. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.Google Scholar
- 40.Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2). Englewood: Biostat; 2011.Google Scholar
- 48.Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis J, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2011;343. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002.
- 49.Leiter MP, Schaufeli WB, Maslach C, Marek T. Burnout as a developmental process: consideration of models. In: Schaufeli WB, Maslach C, Marek T, eds. Professional burnout: recent developments in theory and research. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis; 1993:237–50.Google Scholar
- 50.CMS. http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/hospital-value-based-purchasing/. Accessed September 20 2016.
- 55.Carey RG, Seibert JH. A patient survey system to measure quality improvement: questionnaire reliability and validity. Medical Care. 1993;834–45. doi:10.1097/00005650-199309000-00008.
- 58.Aiken LH, Sermeus W, Van den Heede K, Sloane DM, Busse R, McKee M, et al. Patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States. BMJ. 2012;344, e1717. doi:10.1136/bmj.e1717.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar