Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 262–268 | Cite as

The Effect of Hospital Isolation Precautions on Patient Outcomes and Cost of Care: A Multi-Site, Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

  • Kim Tran
  • Chaim Bell
  • Nathan Stall
  • George Tomlinson
  • Allison McGeer
  • Andrew Morris
  • Michael Gardam
  • Howard B. Abrams
Original Research

Abstract

Background

Isolation precautions have negative effects on patient safety, psychological well-being, and healthcare worker contact. However, it is not known whether isolation precautions affect certain hospital-related outcomes.

Objective

To examine the effect of isolation precautions on hospital-related outcomes and cost of care.

Design

Retrospective, propensity-score matched cohort study of inpatients admitted to general internal medicine (GIM) services at three academic hospitals in Toronto, Ontario, Canada between January 2010 and December 2012.

Participants

Adult (≥18 years of age) patients on isolation precautions for respiratory illnesses and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were matched to controls based on propensity scores derived from nine covariates: age, sex, Resource Intensity Weight, number of hospital readmissions within 90 days, total length of stay for hospital admissions within 90 days, site of admission, month of isolation, year of isolation, and Case Mix Group.

Main Measures

Thirty-day readmission rates and emergency department visits, hospital length of stay, expected length of stay, adverse events, in-hospital mortality, patient complaints, and cost of care in Canadian doll ars (CAD).

Key Results

A total of 17,649 non-isolated patients were admitted to the participating hospitals during the study period. We identified 1506 patients isolated for respiratory illnesses and 745 patients isolated for MRSA. Compared to non-isolated individuals, those on isolation precautions for respiratory illnesses stayed 17 % longer (95 % CI: 9 %, 25 %), stayed 9 % longer than expected (95 % CI: 3 %, 15 %), and had 23 % higher cost of care (95 % CI: 14 %, 32 %). Patients isolated for MRSA had similar outcomes, but they also had a 4.4 % higher (95 % CI: 1.4 %, 7.3 %) rate of readmission to hospital within 30 days.

Conclusions

Isolation precautions are associated with adverse effects which may result in poorer hospital outcomes. Balancing the benefits for the many with the harms to the few will be a future challenge.

KEY WORDS

Isolation Hospital Outcomes 

References

  1. 1.
    Garner JS. Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996;17(1):53–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seto WH, Tsang D, Yung RW, et al. Effectiveness of precautions against droplets and contact in prevention of nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Lancet. 2003;361:1519–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loveday HP, Pellowe CM, Jones SRLJ, Pratt RJ. A systematic review of the evidence for interventions for the prevention and control of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (1996–2004): report to the Joint MRSA Working Party (Subgroup A). J Hosp Infect. 2006;63(Suppl 1):S45–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burke JP. Infection control - a problem for patient safety. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(7):651–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirkland KB. Taking off the gloves: toward a less dogmatic approach to the use of contact isolation. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(6):766–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kirkland KB, Weinstein JM. Adverse effects of contact isolation. Lancet. 1999;354(9185):1177–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saint S, Higgins LA, Nallamothu BK, Chenoweth C. Do physicians examine patients in contact isolation less frequently? A brief report. Am J Infect Control. 2003;31(6):354–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stelfox HT, Bates DW, Redelmeier DA. Safety of patients isolated for infection control. JAMA. 2003;290(14):1899–905.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spence MR, McQuaid M. The interrelationship of isolation precautions and adverse events in an acute care facility. Am J Infect Control. 2011;39(2):154–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Catalano G, Houston SH, Catalano MC, et al. Anxiety and depression in hospitalized patients in resistant organism isolation. South Med J. 2003;96(2):141–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gammon J. Analysis of the stressful effects of hospitalisation and source isolation on coping and psychological constructs. Int J Nurs Pract. 1998;4(2):84–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maunder R, Hunter J, Vincent L, et al. The immediate psychological and occupational impact of the 2003 SARS outbreak in a teaching hospital. CMAJ. 2003;168(10):1245–51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tarzi S, Kennedy P, Stone S, Evans M. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: psychological impact of hospitalization and isolation in an older adult population. J Hosp Infect. 2001;49(4):250–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Day HR, Perencevich EN, Harris AD, Himelhoch SS, Brown CH, Gruber-Baldini AL, et al. Do contact precautions cause depression? A two-year study at a tertiary care medical centre. J Hosp Infect. 2011;79(2):103–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oldman T. Isolated case. Nurs Times. 1998;94:67–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rees J. Psychological effects of isolation nursing (1): mood disturbance. Nurs Stand. 2000;14:35e38.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kennedy P, Hamilton LR. Psychological impact of the management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:617–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilkins EG, Ellis ME, Dunbar EM, Gibbs A. Does isolation of patients with infections induce mental illness? J Infect. 1988;17:43e47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gasink LB, Singer K, Fishman NO, et al. Contact isolation for infection control in hospitalized patients: is patient satisfaction affected? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(3):275–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Canadian Institute for Health Information. Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) metadata. http://www.cihi.ca/CIHI-ext-portal/internet/en/document/types+of+care/hospital+care/acute+care/dad_metadata Published 2014. Accessed January 2015.
  21. 21.
    Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Ontario Case Costing Initiative. https://hsimi.on.ca/hdbportal/ocdm. Published 2011. Accessed August 16, 2012.
  22. 22.
    Cohen E, Lacombe-Duncan A, Spalding K, et al. Integrated complex care coordination for children with medical complexity: a mixed-methods evaluation of tertiary care-community collaboration. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:366.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hwang SW, Weaver J, Aubry T, Hoch JS. Hospital costs and length of stay among homeless patients admitted to medical, surgical, and psychiatric services. Med Care. 2011;49(4):350–354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O’Brien BJ, Willan A, Blackhouse G, Goeree R, Cohen M, Goodman S. Will the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) in patients with acute coronary syndrome save costs in Canada? Am Heart J. 2000;139(3):423–429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Perry S, Homan C. Use of case mix tools for utilization management and planning. Sud Health Technol Inf. 2009;143:496–500.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rubin DB. The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials. Stat Med. 2007;26:20–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Austin PC. Propensity-score matching in the cardiovascular surgery literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review and suggestions for improvement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:1128–1135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Winkelmayer WC, Kurth T. Propensity scores: help or hype? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:1671–1673.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Austin PC. Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biom J. 2009;51(1):171–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding on observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46:399–424.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    D’Agostino R. Tutorial in biostatistics: propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17(19):2265–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Stat. 1985;39(1):33–8.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Austin PC. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med. 2009;28:3083–3107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sekhon JS. Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: the matching package for R. J Stat Softw. 2011;42(7):1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ridgeway G, McCaffrey D, Morral A, Ann B, Burgette L. Toolkit for weighting and analysis of non-equivalent groups. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/twang/vignettes/twang.pdf Published April 28 2016. Accessed June 26, 2016.
  36. 36.
    Jernigan JA, Titus MG, Groschel DH, Getchell-White S, Farr BM. Effectiveness of contact isolation during a hospital outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;143(5):496–504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Geffers C, Farr BM. Risk of transmission of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from patients colonized with MRSA. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005;26(2):114–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Filice GA, Nyman JA, Lexau C, Lees CH, Bockstedt LA, Como-Sabetti K, Lesher LJ, Lynfield R. Excess costs and utilization associated with methicillin resistance for patients with Staphylococcus aureus infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(4):365–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cosgrove SE, Qi Y, Kaye KS, Harbarth S, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y. The impact of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia on patient outcomes: mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005;26(2):166–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gruneir A, Dhalla IA, Van Walraven C, et al. Unplanned readmissions after hospital discharge among patients identified as being at high risk for readmission using a validated predictive algorithm. Open Med. 2011;5(2):e104–e111.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Tran
    • 1
  • Chaim Bell
    • 2
    • 3
  • Nathan Stall
    • 4
  • George Tomlinson
    • 5
    • 6
  • Allison McGeer
    • 7
    • 8
  • Andrew Morris
    • 9
    • 10
  • Michael Gardam
    • 10
    • 11
  • Howard B. Abrams
    • 1
    • 9
    • 12
    • 13
  1. 1.OpenLabUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Institute of Health Policy, Management and EvaluationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal MedicineMount Sinai HospitalTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Core Internal MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Department of MedicineUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada
  7. 7.Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Medicine and Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  8. 8.Department of Microbiology, Division of Infection ControlMount Sinai HospitalTorontoCanada
  9. 9.Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  10. 10.Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious DiseasesUniversity Health Network and Mount Sinai HospitalTorontoCanada
  11. 11.Infectious Diseases and MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  12. 12.Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal MedicineUniversity Health Network and Mount Sinai HospitalTorontoCanada
  13. 13.TorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations