Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 107–117 | Cite as

Technology-Assisted Weight Loss Interventions in Primary Care: A Systematic Review

  • David M. LevineEmail author
  • Stella Savarimuthu
  • Allison Squires
  • Joseph Nicholson
  • Melanie Jay
Original Research

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening for and treating obesity. However, there are many barriers to successfully treating obesity in primary care (PC). Technology-assisted weight loss interventions offer novel ways of improving treatment, but trials are overwhelmingly conducted outside of PC and may not translate well into this setting. We conducted a systematic review of technology-assisted weight loss interventions specifically tested in PC settings.

METHODS

We searched the literature from January 2000 to March 2014. Inclusion criteria: (1) Randomized controlled trial; (2) trials that utilized the Internet, personal computer, and/or mobile device; and (3) occurred in an ambulatory PC setting. We applied the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) and Delphi criteria to assess bias and the Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) criteria to assess pragmatism (whether trials occurred in the real world versus under ideal circumstances). Given heterogeneity, results were not pooled quantitatively.

RESULTS

Sixteen trials met inclusion criteria. Twelve (75 %) interventions achieved weight loss (range: 0.08 kg – 5.4 kg) compared to controls, while 5–45 % of patients lost at least 5 % of baseline weight. Trial duration and attrition ranged from 3–36 months and 6–80 %, respectively. Ten (63 %) studies reported results after at least 1 year of follow-up. Interventions used various forms of personnel, technology modalities, and behavior change elements; trials most frequently utilized medical doctors (MDs) (44 %), web-based applications (63 %), and self-monitoring (81 %), respectively. Interventions that included clinician-guiding software or feedback from personnel appeared to promote more weight loss than fully automated interventions. Only two (13 %) studies used publically available technologies. Many studies had fair pragmatism scores (mean: 2.8/4), despite occurring in primary care.

DISCUSSION

Compared to usual care, technology-assisted interventions in the PC setting help patients achieve weight loss, offering evidence-based options to PC providers. However, best practices remain undetermined. Despite occurring in PC, studies often fall short in utilizing pragmatic methodology and rarely provide publically available technology. Longitudinal, pragmatic, interdisciplinary, and open-source interventions are needed.

KEY WORDS

weight loss technology primary care obesity review 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Contributors

We would like to thank Adina Kalet, MD, MPH for her feedback and editing of the manuscript.

Funders

Veteran Affairs Career Development Award

Prior presentations

Levine D, Savarimuthu S, Nicholson J, Jay M. Technology-assisted weight loss interventions in primary care: A systematic review. Poster Presentation, Society of General Internal Medicine; Denver, CO 2013.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

11606_2014_2987_MOESM1_ESM.docx (67 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 66 kb)

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G, Dietz WH. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA. 1999;282(16):1523–1529.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oster G, Edelsberg J, O’Sullivan AK, Thompson D. The clinical and economic burden of obesity in a managed care setting. Am J Manage Care. 2000;6(6):681–689.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, Gortmaker SL, Brown M. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):815–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Williams BC, Philbrick JT, Becker DM, McDermott A, Davis RC, Buncher PC. A patient-based system for describing ambulatory medicine practices using diagnosis clusters. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6(1):57–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA. 2014;311(8):806–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berghöfer A, Pischon T, Reinhold T, Apovian CM, Sharma AM, Willich SN. Obesity prevalence from a European perspective: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:200.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kushner RF. Roadmaps for clinical practice: case studies in disease prevention and health promotion—assessment and management of adult obesity: a primer for physicians. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2003.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bray GA, Wilson JF. In the clinic. Obesity. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(7):ITC4–1–15.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Obesity: guidance on the prevention, identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in adults and childen. NICE clinical guideline no. 43. 2006. Available at http://www.nice.org.uk/CG43. Accessed 7/17/14.
  10. 10.
    McTigue KM, Harris R, Hemphill B, et al. Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(11):933–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levy RL, Finch EA, Crowell MD, Talley NJ, Jeffery RW. Behavioral intervention for the treatment of obesity: strategies and effectiveness data. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(10):2314–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schappert SM, Rechtsteiner EA. Ambulatory medical care utilization estimates for 2007. Vital Health Stat. 2011;13(169):1–38.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wing RR, Lang W, Wadden TA, et al. Benefits of modest weight loss in improving cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(7):1481–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pi-Sunyer FX. Short-term medical benefits and adverse effects of weight loss. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:722–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williamson DF, Thompson TJ, Thun M, Flanders D, Pamuk E, Byers T. Intentional weight loss and mortality among overweight individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(10):1499–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harrington M, Gibson S, Cottrell RC. A review and meta-analysis of the effect of weight loss on all-cause mortality risk. Nutr Res Rev. 2009;22(1):93–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, et al. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goldstein DJ. Beneficial health effects of modest weight loss. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1992;16(6):397–415.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Appel LJ, Champagne CM, Harsha DW, et al. Effects of comprehensive lifestyle modification on blood pressure control: main results of the PREMIER clinical trial. JAMA. 2003;289(16):2083–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wadden TA, West DS, Neiberg RH, et al. One-year weight losses in the Look AHEAD study: factors associated with success. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17(4):713–22.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sacks FM, Bray GA, Carey VJ, et al. Comparison of weight-loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(9):859–73.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cecchini M, Sassi F, Lauer JA, YY L, Guajardo-Barron V, Chisholm D. Tackling of unhealthy diets, physical inactivity, and obesity: health effects and cost-effectiveness. Lancet. 2010;376(9754):1775–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sciamanna CN, Tate DF, Lang W, Wing RR. Who reports receiving advice to lose weight? Results from a multistate survey. Arch Intern Med. 2010;160(15):2334–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McTigue KM, Conroy MB. Use of the internet in the treatment of obesity and prevention of type 2 diabetes in primary care. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013;72(1):98–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kushner RF. Barriers to providing nutrition counseling by physicians: a survey of primary care practitioners. Prev Med (Baltimore). 1995;24(6):546–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Forman-Hoffman V, Little A, Wahls T. Barriers to obesity management: a pilot study of primary care clinicians. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7:35.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Foster GD, Wadden TA, Makris AP, et al. Primary care physicians’ attitudes about obesity and its treatment. Obes Res. 2003;11(10):1168–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yarnall KSH, Pollak KI, Østbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):635–41.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Iacobucci G. Pay GPs to tackle obesity, doctors urge UK government. BMJ. 2014;348:g232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Block JP, DeSalvo KB, Fisher WP. Are physicians equipped to address the obesity epidemic? Knowledge and attitudes of internal medicine residents. Prev Med. 2003;36(6):669–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jay M, Gillespie C, Ark T, et al. Do internists, pediatricians, and psychiatrists feel competent in obesity care?: using a needs assessment to drive curriculum design. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(7):1066–70.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stafford RS, Farhat JH, Misra B, Schoenfeld DA. National patterns of physician activities related to obesity management. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(7):631–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schauffler HH, Rodriguez T, Milstein A. Health education and patient satisfaction. J Fam Pract. 1996;42(1):62–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bleich SN, Pickett-Blakely O, Cooper LA. Physician practice patterns of obesity diagnosis and weight-related counseling. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82(1):123–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Levy BT, Williamson PS. Patient perceptions and weight loss of obese adults. J Fam Pract. 1988;27(3):285–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Potter MB, Vu JD, Croughan-Minihane M. Weight management: what patients want from their primary care physicians. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(6):513–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Budman SH, Portnoy D, Villapiano AJ. How to get technological innovation used in behavioral health care: Build it and they still might not come. Psychother Theory Res Prac Train. 2013;40:45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tate DF, Wing RR, Winett RA. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001;285(9):1172–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Harvey-Berino J, West D, Krukowski R, et al. Internet delivered behavioral obesity treatment. Prev Med. 2010;51(2):123–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wieland LS, Falzon L, Sciamanna CN, et al. Interactive computer-based interventions for weight loss or weight maintenance in overweight or obese people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8:CD007675.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Neve M, Morgan PJ, Jones PR, Collins CE. Effectiveness of web-based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2010;11(4):306–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Arem H, Irwin M. A review of web-based weight loss interventions in adults. Obes Rev. 2011;12(5):e236–43.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tsai AG, Wadden TA. Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(1):56–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Glasgow RE, Gaglio B, Bennett G, et al. Applying the PRECIS criteria to describe three effectiveness trials of weight loss in obese patients with comorbid conditions. Health Serv Res. 2012;47:1051–67.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, et al. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(5):464–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
  48. 48.
    Bravata D, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298(19):2296–2304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Richardson CR, Newton TL, Abraham JJ, Sen A, Jimbo M, Swartz AM. A Meta-Analysis of Pedometer-Based Walking Interventions and Weight Loss. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(1):69–77.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tsai AG, Wadden TA. Treatment of obesity in primary care practice in the United States: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(9):1073–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for obesity in adults: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(11):930–2.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bensley RJ, Brusk JJ, Rivas J. Key principles in internet-based weight management systems. Am J Health Behav. 2010;34(2):206–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, et al. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(12):1235–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. Risk of bias. 2009. Available at: http://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/uploads/Suggested%20risk%20of%20bias%20criteria%20for%20EPOC%20reviews.pdf. Accessed 7/17/14.
  56. 56.
    Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, Boers M, van den Brandt PA. The art of quality assessment of RCTs included in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(7):651–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Koppenaal T, Linmans J, Knottnerus JA, Spigt M. Pragmatic vs explanatory: an adaptation of the PRECIS tool helps to judge the applicability of systematic reviews for daily practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(10):1095–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Appel LJ, Clark MJ, Yeh HC, et al. Comparative effectiveness of weight-loss interventions in clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1959–68.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Bennett GG, Herring SJ, Puleo E, Stein EK, Emmons KM, Gillman MW. Web-based weight loss in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18(2):308–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bennett GG, Warner ET, Glasgow RE, et al. Obesity treatment for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in primary care practice. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(7):565–74.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Christian JG, Bessesen DH, Byers TE, Christian KK, Goldstein MG, Bock BC. Clinic-based support to help overweight patients with type 2 diabetes increase physical activity and lose weight. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(2):141–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Christian JG, Byers TE, Christian KK, et al. A computer support program that helps clinicians provide patients with metabolic syndrome tailored counseling to promote weight loss. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(1):75–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ma J, Yank V, Xiao L, et al. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention for weight loss into primary care: a randomized trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(2):113–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    McConnon A, Kirk SF, Cockroft JE, et al. The Internet for weight control in an obese sample: results of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:206.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    McDoniel SO, Wolskee P, Shen J. Treating obesity with a novel hand-held device, computer software program, and Internet technology in primary care: the SMART motivational trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;79(2):185–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Mehring M, Haag M, Linde K, et al. Effects of a general practice guided web-based weight reduction program–results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14(1):76.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Nanchahal K, Townsend J, Letley L, Haslam D, Wellings K, Haines A. Weight-management interventions in primary care: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(562):e157–66.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Nanchahal K, Power T, Holdsworth E, et al. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care of the Camden Weight Loss (CAMWEL) programme. BMJ Open. 2012;2(3).Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rothert K, Strecher V, Doyle L. Web based Weight Management Programs in an Integrated Health Care Setting: A Randomized. Controlled Trial. Obesity. 2006;14(2):266–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Spring B, Duncan JM, Janke EA, et al. Integrating technology into standard weight loss treatment: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(2):105–11.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    ter Bogt NCW, Bemelmans WJE, Beltman FW, Broer J, Smit AJ, van der Meer K. Preventing Weight Gain by Lifestyle Intervention in a General Practice Setting. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(4):306–313.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Verheijden M, Bakx JC, Akkermans R, et al. Web-based targeted nutrition counselling and social support for patients at increased cardiovascular risk in general practice: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(4):e44.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Wylie-Rosett J, Swencionis C, Ginsberg M, et al. Computerized Weight Loss Intervention Optimizes Staff Time. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101(10):1155–1162.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    ter Bogt NCW, Bemelmans WJE, Beltman FW, Broer J, Smit AJ, van der Meer K. Preventing weight gain: one-year results of a randomized lifestyle intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(4):270–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Khaylis A, Yiaslas T, Bergstrom J, Gore-Felton C. A review of efficacious technology-based weight-loss interventions: five key components. Telemed J E Health. 2010;16(9):931–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    McCombie L, Lean MEJ, Haslam D. Effective UK weight management services for adults. Clin Obes. 2012;2(3–4):96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bennett GG, Glasgow RE. The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:273–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Krukowski RA, Harvey-Berino J, Ashikaga T, Thomas CS, Micco N. Internet-based weight control: the relationship between web features and weight loss. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14(8):775–82.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Xiao L, Yank V, Wilson SR, Lavori PW, Ma J. Two-year weight-loss maintenance in primary care-based Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle interventions. Nutr Diabetes. 2013;3:e76.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Yoong SL, Carey M, Sanson-Fisher R, Grady A. A systematic review of behavioural weight-loss interventions involving primary-care physicians in overweight and obese primary-care patients (1999–2011). Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(11):2083–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Kodama S, Saito K, Tanaka S, et al. Effect of Web-based lifestyle modification on weight control: a meta-analysis. Int J Obes. 2012;36(5):675–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Reed VA, Schifferdecker KE, Rezaee ME, O’Connor S, Larson RJ. The effect of computers for weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(1):99–108.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Morgan PJ, Lubans DR, Collins CE, Warren JM, Callister R. 12-month outcomes and process evaluation of the SHED-IT RCT: an internet-based weight loss program targeting men. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2011;19(1):142–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Morgan PJ, Callister R, Collins CE, et al. The SHED-IT community trial: a randomized controlled trial of internet- and paper-based weight loss programs tailored for overweight and obese men. Ann Behav Med. 2013;45(2):139–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Whittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Borland R, Rodgers A, Gu Y. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD006611.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Shahab L, McEwen A. Online support for smoking cessation: a systematic review of the literature. Addiction. 2009;104(11):1792–804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Vervloet M, van Dijk L, Santen-Reestman J, et al. SMS reminders improve adherence to oral medication in type 2 diabetes patients who are real time electronically monitored. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81(9):594–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Lester RT, Ritvo P, Mills EJ, et al. Effects of a mobile phone short message service on antiretroviral treatment adherence in Kenya (WelTel Kenya1): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9755):1838–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Bacigalupo R, Cudd P, Littlewood C, Bissell P, Hawley MS, Buckley WH. Interventions employing mobile technology for overweight and obesity: an early systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2013;14(4):279–91.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Chang T, Chopra V, Zhang C, Woolford SJ. The role of social media in online weight management: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e262.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Ritzwoller DP, Glasgow RE, Sukhanova AY, et al. Economic analyses of the Be Fit Be Well program: a weight loss program for community health centers. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(12):1581–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Tsai AG, Wadden TA, Volger S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a primary care intervention to treat obesity. Int J Obes. 2013;37(S1):S31–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Loges WE, Jung J-Y. Exploring the Digital Divide: Internet Connectedness and Age. Commun Res. 2001;28(4):536–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Levine
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stella Savarimuthu
    • 2
  • Allison Squires
    • 3
    • 1
  • Joseph Nicholson
    • 1
  • Melanie Jay
    • 4
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MedicineNew York University School of MedicineNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Hofstra School of MedicineNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.New York University College of NursingNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.VA New York HarborNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations