Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparison of the Willingness of Resident and Attending Physicians to Comply with the Requests of Patients at the End of Life

Journal of General Internal Medicine volume 29, pages 1048–1054 (2014)Cite this article

A Capsule Commentary to this article was published on 23 April 2014

ABSTRACT

Background

Little is known about the differences between physicians in training and post training in their willingness to comply with patient requests at the end of life.

Objective

To compare the attitudes of attendings and residents regarding a range of patient requests at the end of life

Design

Written, cross-sectional survey

Participants

The cohort included 191 attendings randomly selected across the state of Connecticut and 240 residents from 2 university-affiliated Internal Medicine programs.

Main Measures

We surveyed attendings and residents about their willingness to honor the requests of the same decisionally capable elderly patient in five scenarios involving different requests regarding end-of-life treatment.

Results

While a large majority of both attendings and residents were willing to comply with each of the requests to withhold intubation (100 % and 94 %, respectively), to extubate (92 % and 77 %), and to give increasingly higher doses of narcotics (94 % and 71 %), a significantly larger proportion of attendings versus residents was willing to comply with each of these requests. Small proportions of attendings and residents were willing to prescribe a lethal amount of sleeping pills (3 % and 5 %, respectively) and to give a lethal injection in its current illegal state (1 % and 4 %). A significantly larger proportion of residents (32 %) compared to attendings (19 %) was willing to give a lethal injection if legal. Adjusting for sociodemographic factors, attending status was independently associated with willingness to extubate [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.0, 95 % CI = 1.6-5.7] and to give a lethal injection if legal (AOR = 0.5, 95 % CI = 0.3-0.8). The proportion of physicians willing to extubate increased across years since graduation, with the greatest differences occurring across the residency years (69 % to 86 %).

Conclusions and Relevance

Clinical experience was an important determinant of physicians’ willingness to perform multiple patient requests at the end of life, with substantial changes in attitudes occurring during residency training. More research is needed to determine whether dedicated clinical exposure for physicians in training influences attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Farber NJ, Simpson P, Salam T, Collier VU, Weiner J, Boyer EG. Physicians' decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(5):560–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Caralis PV, Hammond JS. Attitudes of medical students, housestaff, and faculty physicians toward euthanasia and termination of life-sustaining treatment. Crit Care Med. 1992;20(5):683–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Christakis NA, Asch DA. Biases in how physicians choose to withdraw life support. Lancet. 1993;342(8872):642–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Christakis NA, Asch DA. Physician characteristics associated with decisions to withdraw life support. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(3):367–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hanson LC, Danis M, Garrett JM, Mutran E. Who decides? Physicians' willingness to use life-sustaining treatment. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(7):785–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fried TR, Stein MD, O'Sullivan PS, Brock DW, Novack DH. Limits of patient autonomy. Physician attitudes and practices regarding life-sustaining treatments and euthanasia. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(6):722–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Emanuel EJ, Fairclough DL, Daniels ER, Clarridge BR. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: attitudes and experiences of oncology patients, oncologists, and the public. Lancet. 1996;347(9018):1805–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolfe J, Fairclough DL, Clarridge BR, Daniels ER, Emanuel EJ. Stability of attitudes regarding physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia among oncology patients, physicians, and the general public. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(4):1274.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shapiro RS, Derse AR, Gottlieb M, Schiedermayer D, Olson M. Willingness to perform euthanasia. A survey of physician attitudes. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(5):575–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bachman JG, Alcser KH, Doukas DJ, Lichtenstein RL, Corning AD, Brody H. Attitudes of Michigan physicians and the public toward legalizing physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(5):303–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bushwick B, Emrhein D, Peters K. A comparison of resident and faculty attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide and active voluntary euthanasia. Fam Med. 2000;32(4):261–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prendergast TJ, Luce JM. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155(1):15–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Doyal L, Wilsher D. Withholding and withdrawing life sustaining treatment from elderly people: towards formal guidelines. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 1994;308(6945):1689–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Solomon MZ, O'Donnell L, Jennings B, et al. Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments. Am J Public Health. 1993;83(1):14–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Consensus report on the ethics of foregoing life-sustaining treatments in the critically ill. Task Force on Ethics of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. Dec 1990;18(12):1435-1439.

  16. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Ann Intern Med. Sep 15 1991;115(6):478-485.

  17. Truog RD, Campbell ML, Curtis JR, et al. Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a consensus statement by the American College [corrected] of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(3):953–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hawryluck LA, Harvey WR, Lemieux-Charles L, Singer PA. Consensus guidelines on analgesia and sedation in dying intensive care unit patients. BMC Med Ethics. 2002;3:E3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Approaching death: improving care at the end of life—a report of the Institute of Medicine. Health Serv Res. Apr 1998;33(1):1-3.

  20. Rubenfeld GD, Curtis JR. Beyond ethical dilemmas: improving the quality of end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2003;7(1):11–2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on improving end-of-life care. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. Dec 6-8 2004;21(3):1-26.

  22. Field MJ, Cassel CK. Approaching death: improving care at the end of life. Health Prog. 2011;92(1):25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Prendergast TJ, Puntillo KA. Withdrawal of life support: intensive caring at the end of life. JAMA. 2002;288(21):2732–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sullivan AM, Lakoma MD, Block SD. The status of medical education in end-of-life care: a national report. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):685–95.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fischer SM, Gozansky WS, Kutner JS, Chomiak A, Kramer A. Palliative care education: an intervention to improve medical residents' knowledge and attitudes. J Palliat Med. 2003;6(3):391–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gorman TE, Ahern SP, Wiseman J, Skrobik Y. Residents' end-of-life decision making with adult hospitalized patients: a review of the literature. Acad Med. 2005;80(7):622–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schroder C, Heyland D, Jiang X, Rocker G, Dodek P. Educating medical residents in end-of-life care: insights from a multicenter survey. J Palliat Med. 2009;12(5):459–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ogle KS, Mavis B, Thomason C. Learning to provide end-of-life care: postgraduate medical training programs in Michigan. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(5):987–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mullan PB, Weissman DE, Ambuel B, von Gunten C. End-of-life care education in internal medicine residency programs: an interinstitutional study. J Palliat Med. 2002;5(4):487–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ury WA, Rahn M, Tolentino V, et al. Can a pain management and palliative care curriculum improve the opioid prescribing practices of medical residents? J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(8):625–31.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Weissman DE, Ambuel B, von Gunten CF, et al. Outcomes from a national multispecialty palliative care curriculum development project. J Palliat Med. 2007;10(2):408–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Weissman DE, Mullan PB, Ambuel B, von Gunten C. End-of-life curriculum reform: outcomes and impact in a follow-up study of internal medicine residency programs. J Palliat Med. 2002;5(4):497–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Minor S, Schroder C, Heyland D. Using the intensive care unit to teach end-of-life skills to rotating junior residents. Am J Surg. 2009;197(6):814–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fins JJ, Nilson EG. An approach to educating residents about palliative care and clinical ethics. Acad Med. 2000;75(6):662–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stillman P, Swanson D, Regan MB, et al. Assessment of clinical skills of residents utilizing standardized patients. A follow-up study and recommendations for application. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(5):393–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stillman PL, Swanson DB. Ensuring the clinical competence of medical school graduates through standardized patients. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(6):1049–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Pete Charpentier and Katy Araujo for their capable assistance with data entry and analysis. The research reported in this manuscript was supported by the James G. Hirsch, MD, Endowed Medical Student Research Fellowship. This sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 337 Crown Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA

    John M. Thomas MD & Terri R. Fried MD

  2. Center of Excellence in Primary Care Education, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA

    John M. Thomas MD

  3. Program on Aging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

    John R. O’Leary MA & Terri R. Fried MD

  4. Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA

    Terri R. Fried MD

Authors
  1. John M. Thomas MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John R. O’Leary MA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Terri R. Fried MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Thomas MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, J.M., O’Leary, J.R. & Fried, T.R. A Comparison of the Willingness of Resident and Attending Physicians to Comply with the Requests of Patients at the End of Life. J GEN INTERN MED 29, 1048–1054 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2830-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2830-0

KEY WORDS

search

Navigation