A Comparison of the Willingness of Resident and Attending Physicians to Comply with the Requests of Patients at the End of Life
- 334 Downloads
Little is known about the differences between physicians in training and post training in their willingness to comply with patient requests at the end of life.
To compare the attitudes of attendings and residents regarding a range of patient requests at the end of life
Written, cross-sectional survey
The cohort included 191 attendings randomly selected across the state of Connecticut and 240 residents from 2 university-affiliated Internal Medicine programs.
We surveyed attendings and residents about their willingness to honor the requests of the same decisionally capable elderly patient in five scenarios involving different requests regarding end-of-life treatment.
While a large majority of both attendings and residents were willing to comply with each of the requests to withhold intubation (100 % and 94 %, respectively), to extubate (92 % and 77 %), and to give increasingly higher doses of narcotics (94 % and 71 %), a significantly larger proportion of attendings versus residents was willing to comply with each of these requests. Small proportions of attendings and residents were willing to prescribe a lethal amount of sleeping pills (3 % and 5 %, respectively) and to give a lethal injection in its current illegal state (1 % and 4 %). A significantly larger proportion of residents (32 %) compared to attendings (19 %) was willing to give a lethal injection if legal. Adjusting for sociodemographic factors, attending status was independently associated with willingness to extubate [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 3.0, 95 % CI = 1.6-5.7] and to give a lethal injection if legal (AOR = 0.5, 95 % CI = 0.3-0.8). The proportion of physicians willing to extubate increased across years since graduation, with the greatest differences occurring across the residency years (69 % to 86 %).
Conclusions and Relevance
Clinical experience was an important determinant of physicians’ willingness to perform multiple patient requests at the end of life, with substantial changes in attitudes occurring during residency training. More research is needed to determine whether dedicated clinical exposure for physicians in training influences attitudes.
KEY WORDSgeriatrics end of life decision making bioethics
We thank Pete Charpentier and Katy Araujo for their capable assistance with data entry and analysis. The research reported in this manuscript was supported by the James G. Hirsch, MD, Endowed Medical Student Research Fellowship. This sponsor had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
- 15.Consensus report on the ethics of foregoing life-sustaining treatments in the critically ill. Task Force on Ethics of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. Dec 1990;18(12):1435-1439.Google Scholar
- 16.Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Ann Intern Med. Sep 15 1991;115(6):478-485.Google Scholar
- 19.Approaching death: improving care at the end of life—a report of the Institute of Medicine. Health Serv Res. Apr 1998;33(1):1-3.Google Scholar
- 21.NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on improving end-of-life care. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. Dec 6-8 2004;21(3):1-26.Google Scholar