Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 28, Issue 8, pp 1048–1055 | Cite as

Teaching Hospital Five-Year Mortality Trends in the Wake of Duty Hour Reforms

  • Kevin G. Volpp
  • Dylan S. Small
  • Patrick S. Romano
  • Kamal M. F. Itani
  • Amy K. Rosen
  • Orit Even-Shoshan
  • Yanli Wang
  • Lisa Bellini
  • Michael J. Halenar
  • Sophia Korovaichuk
  • Jingsan Zhu
  • Jeffrey H. Silber
Original Research

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented duty hour regulations for residents in 2003 and again in 2011. While previous studies showed no systematic impacts in the first 2 years post-reform, the impact on mortality in subsequent years has not been examined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether duty hour regulations were associated with changes in mortality among Medicare patients in hospitals of different teaching intensity after the first 2 years post-reform.

DESIGN

Observational study using interrupted time series analysis with data from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2008. Logistic regression was used to examine the change in mortality for patients in more versus less teaching-intensive hospitals before (2000–2003) and after (2003–2008) duty hour reform, adjusting for patient comorbidities, time trends, and hospital site.

PATIENTS

Medicare patients (n = 13,678,956) admitted to short-term acute care non-federal hospitals with principal diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), gastrointestinal bleeding, or congestive heart failure (CHF); or a diagnosis-related group (DRG) classification of general, orthopedic, or vascular surgery.

MAIN MEASURE

All-location mortality within 30 days of hospital admission.

KEY RESULTS

In medical and surgical patients, there were no consistent changes in the odds of mortality at more vs. less teaching intensive hospitals in post-reform years 1–3. However, there were significant relative improvements in mortality for medical patients in the fourth and fifth years post-reform: Post4 (OR 0.88, 95 % CI [0.93–0.94]); Post5 (OR 0.87, [0.82–0.92]) and for surgical patients in the fifth year post-reform: Post5 (OR 0.91, [0.85–0.96]).

CONCLUSIONS

Duty hour reform was associated with no significant change in mortality in the early years after implementation, and with a trend toward improved mortality among medical patients in the fourth and fifth years. It is unclear whether improvements in outcomes long after implementation can be attributed to the reform, but concerns about worsening outcomes seem unfounded.

KEY WORDS

patient outcomes mortality duty hour reform ACGME administrative data 

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington: National Academy Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Resident duty hours language: Final requirements. 2003; http://www.acgme.org. Accessed February 18, 2013.
  3. 3.
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Report of the work group on resident duty hours and the learning environment. June 11, 2002. In: The ACGME’s approach to limit resident duty hours 12 months after implementation: a summary of achievements, 2004. 2006; http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/PublicationsPapers/dh_dutyhoursummary2003–04.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2013.
  4. 4.
    Volpp KG, Rosen AK, Rosenbaum PR, et al. Mortality among hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries in the first 2 years following ACGME resident duty hour reform. JAMA. 2007;298(9):975–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Volpp KG, Rosen AK, Rosenbaum PR, et al. Mortality among patients in VA hospitals in the first 2 years following ACGME resident duty hour reform. JAMA. 2007;298(9):984–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shetty KD, Bhattacharya J. Changes in hospital mortality associated with residency work-hour regulations. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(2):73–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Volpp KG, Rosen AK, Rosenbaum PR, et al. Did duty hour reform lead to better outcomes among the highest risk patients? J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(10):1149–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosen AK, Loveland SA, Romano PS, et al. Effects of resident duty hour reform on surgical and procedural patient safety indicators among hospitalized Veterans Health Administration and Medicare patients. Med Care. 2009;47(7):723–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Press MJ, Silber JH, Rosen AK, et al. The impact of resident duty hour reform on hospital readmission rates among Medicare beneficiaries. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(4):405–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Rosen AK, et al. Prolonged hospital stay and the resident duty hour rules of 2003. Med Care. 2009;47(12):1191–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nasca TJ, Day SH, Amis ES, Jr. The new recommendations on duty hours from the ACGME Task Force. N Engl J Med. 2010.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Croasdale M. Johns Hopkins Penalized for Resident Hour Violations. 2003; http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2003/09/15/prsc0915.htm. Accessed February 18, 2013.
  13. 13.
    Killelea BK, Chao L, Scarpinato V, Wallack MK. The 80-hour workweek. Surg Clin N Am. 2004;84(6):1557–72, x.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fletcher KE, Reed DA, Arora VM. Patient safety, resident education and resident well-being following implementation of the 2003 ACGME duty hour rules. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(8):907–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moonesinghe SR, Lowery J, Shahi N, Millen A, Beard JD. Impact of reduction in working hours for doctors in training on postgraduate medical education and patients’ outcomes: systematic review. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2011;342:d1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Iezzoni LI. Risk Adjustment for Measuring Health-care Outcomes. 3rd ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, Northfield TC. Variation in outcome after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. Lancet. 1995;346(8971):346–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Inpatient Quality Indicators Download. AHRQ Quality Indicators. 2007; http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/downloads/software/sas/v21r4/iqi_guide_rev4.pdf Accessed February 18, 2013.
  19. 19.
    Second Report of the California Hospitals Outcomes Project. Acute Myocardial Infarction 1996; http://repositories.cdlib.org/chsrpc/coshpd/index.html#1996. Accessed February 18, 2013.
  20. 20.
    Iezzoni LI, Burnside S, Sickles L, Moskowitz MA, Sawitz E. Coding of acute myocardial infarction: clinical policy and implications. Ann Intern Med. 1988;109:745–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kiyota Y, Schneeweiss S, Glynn RJ, Cannuscio CC, Avorn J, Solomon DH. Accuracy of Medicare claims-based diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: estimating positive predictive value on the basis of review of hospital records. Am Hear J. 2004;148(1):99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36(1):8–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lawthers AG, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Petersen LE, Palmer RH, Iezzoni LI. Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data: is it valid? Med Care. 2000;38(8):785–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Keeler EB, Rubenstein LV, Kahn KL, et al. Hospital characteristics and quality of care. JAMA. 1992;268(13):1709–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Allison JJ, Kiefe CI, Weissman NW, et al. Relationship of hospital teaching status with quality of care and mortality for Medicare patients with acute MI. JAMA. 2000;284(10):1256–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Taylor DH, Whellan DJ, Sloan FA. Effects of admission to a teaching hospital on the cost and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(4):293–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Dallas: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1963.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin; 2002.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rosenbaum PR. Stability in the absence of treatment. J Am Stat Assoc. 2001;96:210–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Field C, Welsh A. Bootstrapping clustered data. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 2007;69:369–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    CMS. Fiscal year 2009 quality measure reporting for 2010 payment update 2009; https://www.cms.gov/HospitalQualityInits/downloads/HospitalRHQDAPU200808.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2013.
  32. 32.
    CMS. Premier Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration. 2011; https://www.cms.gov/HospitalQualityInits/35_HospitalPremier.asp. Accessed February 18, 2013.
  33. 33.
    RAC. Critical access hospital (CAH) frequently asked questions. Health and human services information for rural America 2011; http://www.raconline.org/topics/hospitals/cahfaq.php. Accessed February 18, 2013.
  34. 34.
    Landrigan CP, Barger LK, Cade BE, Ayas NT, Czeisler CA. Interns’ compliance with accreditation council for graduate medical education work-hour limits. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1063–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The ACGME’s approach to limit resident duty hours 12 months after implementation: A summary of achievements, 2004. 2006; http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/PublicationsPapers/dh_dutyhoursummary2003-04.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2013.
  36. 36.
    Pellegrini VD Jr, Peabody T, Dinges DF, Moody J, Fabri PJ. Symposium resident work-hour guidelines. A sentence or an opportunity for orthopaedic education? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(11):2576–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin G. Volpp
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Dylan S. Small
    • 5
  • Patrick S. Romano
    • 6
  • Kamal M. F. Itani
    • 7
  • Amy K. Rosen
    • 8
    • 9
  • Orit Even-Shoshan
    • 10
    • 12
  • Yanli Wang
    • 10
  • Lisa Bellini
    • 2
  • Michael J. Halenar
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sophia Korovaichuk
    • 10
  • Jingsan Zhu
    • 2
    • 4
  • Jeffrey H. Silber
    • 3
    • 10
    • 11
    • 12
  1. 1.Center for Health Equity Research and PromotionVeteran’s Administration HospitalPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medicine, Perelman School of MedicineThe University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Health Care Management, The Wharton SchoolThe University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.The Leonard Davis Institute, Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral EconomicsThe University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  5. 5.Department of Statistics, The Wharton SchoolThe University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  6. 6.Division of General Medicine and Center for Healthcare Policy and ResearchUniversity of California Davis School of MedicineSacramentoUSA
  7. 7.Department of SurgeryVA Boston Healthcare System and Boston UniversityBostonUSA
  8. 8.Center for Organization, Leadership and Management ResearchVA Boston Healthcare SystemBostonUSA
  9. 9.Department of Health Policy and ManagementBoston University School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  10. 10.Center for Outcomes ResearchThe Children’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA
  11. 11.The Departments of Pediatrics and Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of MedicineThe University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  12. 12.Leonard Davis Institute of Health EconomicsPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations