Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 630–636 | Cite as

Breast Cancer Treatment Decision-Making: Are We Asking Too Much of Patients?

  • Jennifer C. Livaudais
  • Rebeca Franco
  • Kezhen Fei
  • Nina A. Bickell
Original Research

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE

Physicians are mandated to offer treatment choices to patients, yet not all patients may want the responsibility that entails. We evaluated predisposing factors for, and long-term consequences of, too much and not enough perceived decision-making responsibility among breast cancer patients.

DESIGN

Longitudinal assessment, with measurements collected just after surgical treatment (baseline) and 6-month follow-up.

PARTICIPANTS

Women with early-stage breast cancer treated surgically at eight NYC hospitals, recruited for a randomized controlled trial of patient assistance to improve receipt of adjuvant treatment.

MEASUREMENTS

Using logistic regression, we explored multivariable-adjusted associations between perceived treatment decision-making responsibility and a) baseline knowledge of treatment benefit and b) 6-month decision regret.

RESULTS

Of 368 women aged 28–89 years, 72 % reported a “reasonable amount”, 21 % “too much”, and 7 % “not enough” responsibility for treatment decision-making at baseline. Health literacy problems were most common among those with “not enough” (68 %) and “too much” responsibility (62 %). Only 29 % of women had knowledge of treatment benefits; 40 % experienced 6-month decision regret. In multivariable analysis, women reporting “too much” vs. “reasonable amount” of responsibility had less treatment knowledge ([OR] = 0.44, [95 % CI] = 0.20–0.99; model c = 0.7343;p < 0.01) and more decision regret ([OR] = 2.,91 [95 % CI] = 1.40–6.06; model c = 0.7937;p < 0.001). Findings were similar for women reporting “not enough” responsibility, though not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Too much perceived responsibility for breast cancer treatment decisions was associated with poor baseline treatment knowledge and 6-month decision regret. Health literacy problems were common, suggesting that health care professionals find alternative ways to communicate with low health literacy patients, enabling them to assume the desired amount of decision-making responsibility, thereby reducing decision regret.

KEY WORDS

breast cancer treatment decision-making treatment knowledge decision regret health literacy 

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Epstein RM, Street RLJ. Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute; 2007.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hack TF, et al. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15(1):9–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moyer A, Salovey P. Patient participation in treatment decision making and the psychological consequences of breast cancer surgery. Womens Health. 1998;4(2):103–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gaston CM, Mitchell G. Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(10):2252–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hawley ST, et al. Factors associated with patient involvement in surgical treatment decision making for breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(3):387–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katz SJ, et al. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(24):5526–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gustafson DH, et al. CHESS: a computer-based system for providing information, referrals, decision support and social support to people facing medical and other health-related crises. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992;161–5.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hegel MT, et al. Distress, psychiatric syndromes, and impairment of function in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer. 2006;107(12):2924–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lantz PM, et al. Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(3):745–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bickell NA, et al. Underuse of breast cancer adjuvant treatment: patient knowledge, beliefs, and medical mistrust. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(31):5160–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lash TL, et al. Adherence to tamoxifen over the five-year course. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;99(2):215–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oates DJ, Silliman RA. Health literacy: improving patient understanding. Oncology (Williston Park). 2009;23(4):376, 379.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brehaut JC, et al. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making. 2003;23(4):281–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Veronesi U, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1227–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Safran DG, et al. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract. 1998;47(3):213–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heisler M, et al. The relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision making, and patient understanding in diabetes self-management. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(4):243–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stacey D, Paquet L, Samant R. Exploring cancer treatment decision-making by patients: a descriptive study. Curr Oncol. 2010;17(4):85–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tariman JD, et al. Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(6):1145–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hubbard G, Kidd L, Donaghy E. Preferences for involvement in treatment decision making of patients with cancer: a review of the literature. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(4):299–318.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singh JA, et al. Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(9):688–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fagerlin A, et al. An informed decision? Breast cancer patients and their knowledge about treatment. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64(1–3):303–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Scharff DP, et al. More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010;21(3):879–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gerend MA, Pai M. Social determinants of Black–White disparities in breast cancer mortality: a review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17(11):2913–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ashing-Giwa KT, et al. Understanding the breast cancer experience of Latina women. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2006;24(3):19–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Buki LP, et al. Latina breast cancer survivors’ lived experiences: diagnosis, treatment, and beyond. Cult Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2008;14(2):163–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Napoles-Springer AM, et al. Information exchange and decision making in the treatment of Latina and white women with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2007;25(4):19–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gustafson DH, et al. Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(7):435–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gustafson DH, et al. CHESS: 10 years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved. Int J Med Inform. 2002;65(3):169–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Molenaar S, et al. Decision support for patients with early-stage breast cancer: effects of an interactive breast cancer CDROM on treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(6):1676–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sepucha K, Belkora J. Importance of decision quality in breast cancer care. Psicooncologia. 2010;7(2–3):313–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer C. Livaudais
    • 1
  • Rebeca Franco
    • 1
  • Kezhen Fei
    • 1
  • Nina A. Bickell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health Evidence and PolicyMount Sinai School of MedicineNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations