Physicians and patients increasingly use social media technologies, such as Facebook, Twitter, and weblogs (blogs), both professionally and personally. Amidst recent reports of physician misbehavior online, as well as concerns about social media’s potential negative effect on trust in the medical profession, several national-level physician organizations have created professional guidelines on social media use by physicians. Missing from these guidelines is adequate attention to conflict of interest. Some guidelines do not explicitly mention conflict of interest; others recommend only disclosure. Recommending disclosure fails to appreciate the unique features of social media that make adequate disclosure difficult to accomplish. Moreover, in emphasizing disclosure alone, current guidelines are inconsistent with medicine’s general trend toward management or elimination, not just disclosure, of potential conflicts. Because social media sites typically rely on physicians’ voluntary compliance with professional norms, physicians necessarily play a major role in shaping these norms’ content and scope. To achieve the benefits of social media and ensure the veracity of social media content while preserving trust in the profession, physicians must reaffirm their commitment to disclose potential conflicts; advocate for better electronic disclosure mechanisms; and develop concrete management strategies—including, where necessary, the elimination of conflicts altogether.
professionalism ethics internet conflict of interest blogging social media
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This research was supported by a Greenwall Post-doctoral Fellowship in Bioethics and Health Policy. The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he does not have a conflict of interest.
Thompson LA, Dawson K, Ferdig R, et al. The intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(7):954–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manhattan Research LLC. Taking the Pulse: Physicians and Emerging Information Technologies. New York, NY: Manhattan Research; April 2010.Google Scholar
Fox S. The Social Life of Health Information. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington DC: Pew Research Center; 2011.Google Scholar
Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Hickman SE, Terry CL, Helft PR. The patient–doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;26(10):1168–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant RM, Elmer S, Lurie N. Integrating social media into emergency-preparedness efforts. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:289–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicks P, Vaughan TE, Massagli MP, Heywood J. Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(5):411–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier A, Holm T, Wicks P, et al. Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: a prospective trial. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2012;13(2):210–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamout SZ, Glick ZA, Lind DS, Monson RA, Glick PL. Using social media to enhance surgeon and patient education and communication. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2011;96(7):7–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
George DR. “Friending Facebook?” A minicourse on the use of social media by health professionals. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011;31(3):215–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chretien KC, Greysen SR, Chretien JP, Kind T. Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA. 2009;302:1308–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald J, Sohn S, Ellis P. Privacy, professionalism and Facebook: a dilemma for young doctors. Med Educ. 2010;44(8):805–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shore R, Halsey J, Shah K, Crigger BJ, Douglas SP, AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs (CEJA). Report of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: professionalism in the use of social media. J Clin Ethics. 2011;22(2):165–172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Snyder L, American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism, and Human Rights Committee. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual, Sixth Edition. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:73–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Watkins C, Moore L, Harvey I, Carthy P, Robinson E, Brawn R. Characteristics of general practitioners who frequently see drug industry representatives: national cross sectional study. BMJ. 2003;326:1178–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrank WH, Choudhry NK, Swanton K, et al. Variations in structure and content of online social networks for patients with diabetes. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(17):1589–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene JA, Choudhry NK, Kilabuk E, Shrank WH. Online social networking by patients with diabetes: a qualitative evaluation of communication with Facebook. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(3):287–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326(7400):1167–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramo DE, Prochaska JJ. Broad reach and targeted recruitment using Facebook for an online survey of young adult substance use. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(1):e28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipkin DA, Steinman MA. Interactions between pharmaceutical representatives and doctors in training. A thematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(8):777–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnan JM, Paro JA, Higa JT, Reddy ST, Humphrey HJ, Arora VM. Commentary: The relationship status of digital media and professionalism: it’s complicated. Acad Med. 2009;84(11):1479–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagu T, Kaufman EJ, Asch DA, Armstrong K. Content of weblogs written by health professionals. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(10):1642–1646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, et al. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(22):2618–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewenstein G, Cain DM, Sah S. The limits of transparency: pitfalls and potential of disclosing conflicts of interest. AER Papers Proc. 2011;101(3):423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compilation of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 111th Congress, 2nd session. Title VI. Subtitle A. Section 6002. May 1, 2010.Google Scholar
Bovi AM, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association. Use of health-related online sites. Am J Bioeth. 2003;3(3):W-IF3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Gibbons RV, Landry FJ, Blouch DL, et al. A comparison of physicians’ and patients’ attitudes toward pharmaceutical industry gifts. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(3):151–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo B, Field MJ, for the Committee on Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Conflict of interest in medical research, education and practice. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2009.Google Scholar