Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 645–651 | Cite as

Ethical Concerns Related to Grateful Patient Philanthropy: The Physician’s Perspective

  • Scott M. Wright
  • Leah Wolfe
  • Rosalyn Stewart
  • John A. Flynn
  • Richard Paisner
  • Steve Rum
  • Gregory Parson
  • Joseph Carrese
Original Research

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Philanthropic contributions to academic medical centers from grateful patients support research, patient care, education, and capital projects. The goal of this study was to identify the ethical concerns associated with philanthropic gifts from grateful patients.

METHODS

A qualitative study design was selected. Investigators conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 20 Department of Medicine physicians at Johns Hopkins who were identified by Development Office staff as experienced and successful in this realm—those having relationships with multiple patients who have made philanthropic contributions. Interview transcripts were independently coded by two investigators. Content analysis identified several themes related to ethical concerns.

RESULTS

Eighteen informants (90 %) were Associate Professors or Professors; two (10 %) were females. Four thematic domains emerged related to ethical concerns associated with philanthropy from grateful patients: (i) impact of gift on the doctor–patient relationship; (ii) gift acquisition considered beyond the physician’s professional role; (iii) justice and fairness; and (iv) vulnerability of patients. Despite acknowledging at least one of the aforementioned concerns, eleven physician informants (55 %) expressed the view that there were no ethical issues involved with grateful patient philanthropy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this paper, we report that physicians involved in grateful patient philanthropy are aware of, and in some cases troubled by, the ethical concerns related to this activity. Further studies could examine how best to prepare faculty for the challenges that may accompany these gifts so as to help them maintain expected professional and ethical standards when accepting grateful patient philanthropy.

KEY WORDS

philanthropy ethics patient care 

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    DeMaria A. Philanthropy and medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1725–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elj TJ. Grateful patient programs: current trends, strategies and tactics. AHP J. 2007;8:17.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stewart R, Wolfe L, Flynn J, Carrese J, Wright SM. Success in grateful patient philanthropy: insights from experienced physicians. Am J Med. 2011;124(12):1180–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cooper J. Tapping the river of grateful patients: principles and techniques for best practices in patient prospecting. AHP J. 2006:32–5.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Staff Writer. A new breed of donor: trends in gift giving. AHP J. 2002:22–5.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Teigen KH, Olsen MVG, Solas OE. Giver–receiver asymmetries in gift preferences. Br J Soc Psychol. 2005;44:125–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Capozzi JD, Rhodes R. Gifts from patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2339–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spence SA. Patients bearing gifts: are there strings attached?. 2005;331:1527–9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gaufberg E. Should physicians accept gifts from patients? Am Acad Fam Phys. 2007;76:437–8.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freeman J. Gifts from patients—Ceja provides guidance. IowaMedicine. 2003:22.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roberts LW. Ethical philanthropy in academic psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:772–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Christmas C, Kravet S, Durso C, Wright SM. Defining clinical excellence in academic medicine: a qualitative study of the master clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:989–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wright SM, Carrese JA. Excellence in role modeling: insight and perspectives from the pros. CMAJ. 2002;167:638–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schonberg MA, Ramanan RA, McCarthy EP, Marcantonio ER. Decision making and counseling around mammography screening for women aged 80 or older. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:979–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Green ML, Ruff TR. Why do residents fail to answer their clinical questions? A qualitative study of barriers to practicing evidence-based medicine. Acad Med. 2005;80:176–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ratanawongsa N, Teherani A, Hauer KE. Third-year medical students’ experiences with dying patients during the internal medicine clerkship: a qualitative study of the informal curriculum. Acad Med. 2005;80:641–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. NYC: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kern DE, Wright SM, Carrese JA, Lipkin M, Simmons JM, Novack DH, Kalet A, Frankel R. Personal growth in medical faculty: a qualitative study. West J Med. 2001;175:92–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wright SM, Levine RB, Beasley B, Haidet P, Gress TW, Caccamese S, Brady D, Marwaha A, Kern DE. Personal growth and its correlates during residency training. Med Educ. 2006;40:737–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Medical Professionalism Project. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physicians’ charter. Lancet. 2002;359:520–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roberts LW. Ethical Philanthropy in Academic Psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:772–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    American Medical Association. CEJA Report 4-A-03. Gifts from patients to physicians. 2003; http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/code-medical-ethics/10017a.pdf , Accessed 8/31/12.
  25. 25.
    American Medical Association. Code of Medical Ethics. Opinion 10.017—Gift[s] from Patients. 2010; http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion10017.shtml, Accessed 8/31/12.
  26. 26.
    American Medical Association. CEJA Report 7-A-04. Physician Participation in Soliciting Contributions From Patients. 2004; http://www.ama-assn.org/resources/doc/ethics/7a04.pdf, Accessed 8/31/12.
  27. 27.
    Weinstein ND. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39:806–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Perloff LS, Fetzer BK. Self-other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimization. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1986;50:502–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott M. Wright
    • 1
  • Leah Wolfe
    • 1
  • Rosalyn Stewart
    • 2
  • John A. Flynn
    • 2
  • Richard Paisner
    • 1
  • Steve Rum
    • 1
  • Gregory Parson
    • 1
  • Joseph Carrese
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Divisions of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical CenterJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins HospitalJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Program on Ethics in Clinical Practice, Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of BioethicsJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations