They Don’t Know What They Don’t Know: Internal Medicine Residents’ Knowledge and Confidence in Urine Drug Test Interpretation for Patients with Chronic Pain
- 332 Downloads
Urine drug testing (UDT) can help identify misuse or diversion of opioid medications among patients with chronic pain. However, misinterpreting results can lead to false reassurance or erroneous conclusions about drug use.
To examine the relationship between resident physicians’ knowledge about UDT interpretation and confidence in their ability to interpret UDT results.
Internal medicine residents in a university health system in the Bronx, from 2010 to 2011.
We assessed knowledge using a 7-item scale (UDT knowledge score), and confidence in UDT interpretation using a single statement (“I feel confident in my ability to interpret the results of urine drug tests”). We conducted chi-square tests, t-tests, and logistic regression to determine the association between knowledge and confidence, and in exploratory analyses to examine whether resident characteristics (gender, training level, and UDT use) moderated the relationship between knowledge and confidence.
Among 99 residents, the mean UDT knowledge score was 3.0 out of 7 (SD 1.2). Although 55 (56 %) of residents felt confident in their ability to interpret UDT results, 40 (73 %) of confident residents had a knowledge score of 3 or lower. Knowledge score was not associated with confidence among the full sample or when stratified by training level or UDT use. The association between knowledge and confidence differed significantly by gender (interaction term p < 0.01). Adjusting for training level and UDT use, knowledge was positively associated with confidence among females (AOR 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.06, 3.30), and negatively associated with confidence among males (AOR 0.47, 95 % CI: 0.23, 0.98).
Despite poor knowledge about UDT interpretation, most resident physicians felt confident in their ability to interpret UDT results. Gender differences warrant further exploration, but even confident physicians who use UDT should evaluate their proficiency in interpreting UDT results. Educational initiatives should emphasize the complexities of UDT interpretation.
KEY WORDSurine drug testing chronic pain opioid medications physician self-assessment
- 1.Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) Highlights-- 2006 National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services. OAS Series #S-40, DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 08–4313, Rockville, MD, 2007; http://www.samhsa.gov/data/TEDS2k6highlights/TOC.htm. Accessed 10 July 2012.
- 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital Signs: Overdoses of Prescription Opioid Pain Relievers-- United States, 1999–2008. In: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 4 Nov 2011 ed:1487–92.Google Scholar
- 5.Utah Department of Health. Utah Clinical Guidelines on Prescribing Opioids for Treatment of Pain. Salt Lake City, UT, 2009; http://www.dopl.utah.gov/licensing/forms/OpioidGuidlines.pdf Accessed 10 July 2012.
- 7.Washington State Agency Medical Directors' Group. Interagency Guideline on Opioid Dosing for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain. 2010; http://www.agencymeddirectors.wa.gov/Files/OpioidGdline.pdf Accessed 10 July 2012.
- 17.Gilbert JW, Wheeler GR, Mick GE, et al. Importance of urine drug testing in the treatment of chronic noncancer pain: implications of recent medicare policy changes in kentucky. Pain physician. 13:167–86.Google Scholar
- 22.Reisfield GM, Webb FJ, Bertholf RL, Sloan PA, Wilson GR. Family physicians' proficiency in urine drug test interpretation. J Opioid Manag. 2007;3.Google Scholar
- 27.Lundeberg MA. Highly Confident, but Wrong: Gender Differences and Similarities in Confidence Judgments. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA, 1992; http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED347899.pdf Accessed 10 July 2012.
- 28.Nomura K, Yano E, Fukui T. Gender differences in clinical confidence: a nationwide survey of resident physicians in Japan. Acad Med. 85:647–53.Google Scholar
- 39.Haywood BL, Porter SL, Grana WA. Assessment of musculoskeletal knowledge in primary care residents. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2006;35:273–5.Google Scholar
- 42.Shults TF. The Medical Review Officer Handbook, Ninth Edition. Research Triangle Park, NC: Quadrangle Research, LLC; 2009.Google Scholar