Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 78–84 | Cite as

Provider Characteristics, Clinical-Work Processes and Their Relationship to Discharge Summary Quality for Sub-Acute Care Patients

  • Amy J.H. Kind
  • Carolyn T. Thorpe
  • Justin A. Sattin
  • Stacy E. Walz
  • Maureen A. Smith
Original Research



Discharge summaries play a pivotal role in the transitional care of patients discharged to sub-acute care facilities, but the best ways to facilitate document completeness/quality remain unknown.


To examine the relationship among clinical-work processes, provider characteristics, and discharge summary content to identify approaches that promote high-quality discharge documentation.


Retrospective cohort study.


All hip fracture and stroke patients discharged to sub-acute care facilities during 2003–2005 from a large Midwestern academic medical center (N = 489). Patients on hospice/comfort care were excluded.


We abstracted 32 expert-recommended components in four categories (‘patient’s medical course,’ ‘functional/cognitive ability at discharge,’ ‘future plan of care,’ and ‘name/contact information’) from the discharge summaries of sample patients. We examined predictors for the number of included components within each category using Poisson regression models. Predictors included work processes (document completion in relation to discharge day; completion time of day) and provider characteristics (training year; specialty).


Historical components (i.e., ‘patient’s medical course’ category) were included more often than components that directly inform the admission orders in the sub-acute care facility (i.e., ‘future plan of care’). In this latter category, most summaries included a discharge medication list (99%), disposition (90%), and instructions for follow-up (91%), but less frequently included diet (68%), activity instructions (58%), therapy orders (56%), prognosis/diagnosis communication to patient/family (15%), code status (7%), and pending studies (6%). ‘Future plan of care’ components were more likely to be omitted if a discharge summary was created >24 h after discharge (incident rate ratio = 0.91, 95% confidence interval = 0.84–0.98) or if an intern created the summary (0.90, 0.83–0.97).


Critical component omissions in discharge summaries were common, and were associated with delayed document creation and less experienced providers. More research is needed to understand the impact of discharge documentation quality on patient/system outcomes.


discharge documentation hospital discharge quality discharge summary transitions in care work processes 

Supplementary material

11606_2011_1860_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (101 kb)
ESM 1(PDF 100 kb)


  1. 1.
    Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: Implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297:831–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Meara JR, Wood JL, Wilson MA, Hart MC. Home from hospital: a survey of hospital discharge arrangements in Northamptonshire. J Public Health Med. 1992;14:145–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pantilat SZ, Lindenauer PK, Katz PP, Wachter RM. Primary care physician attitudes regarding communication with hospitalists. American Journal of Medicine. 2001;111:15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) (online). Standard IM.6.10, EP 7. Available at: Accessed August 23, 2011.
  5. 5.
    Tulloch AJ, Fowler GH, McMullan JJ, Spence JM. Hospital discharge reports: content and design. Br Med J. 1975;4:443–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coleman EA. Falling through the cracks: Challenges and opportunities for improving transitional care for persons with continuous complex care needs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:549–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Walraven C, Laupacis A, Seth R, Wells G. Dictated versus database-generated discharge summaries: a randomized clinical trial. CMAJ. 1999;160:319–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Walraven C, Mamdani M, Fang J, Austin PC. Continuity of care and patient outcomes after hospital discharge. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:624–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bado W, Williams CJ. Usefulness of letters from hospitals to general practitioners. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984;288:1813–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Solomon JK, Maxwell RBH, Hopkins AP. Content of a discharge summary from a medical ward - Views of general-practitioners and hospital doctors. J Roy Coll Phys Lond. 1995;29:307–10.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sackley CM, Pound K. Stroke patients entering nursing home care: A content analysis of discharge letters. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:736–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deutsch A, Fiedler RC, Iwanenko W, Granger CV, Russell CF. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report: patients discharged from subacute rehabilitation programs in 1999. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:703–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nguyen-Oghalai TU, Kuo YF, Zhang DD, Graham JE, Goodwin JS, Ottenbacher KJ. Discharge setting for patients with hip fracture: trends from 2001 to 2005. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:1063–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dimant J. Roles and responsibilities of attending physicians in skilled nursing facilities. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2003;4:231–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matthews FE, Dening T. Prevalence of dementia in institutional care. Lancet. 2002;360:225–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Myers JS, Jaipaul CK, Kogan JR, Krekun S, Bellini LM, Shea JA. Are discharge summaries teachable? The effects of a discharge summary curriculum on the quality of discharge summaries in an internal medicine residency program. Academic Medicine. 2006;81:S5–S8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baxter NN, Habermann EB, Tepper JE, Durham SB, Virnig BA. Risk of pelvic fractures in older women following pelvic irradiation. JAMA. 2005;294:2587–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nichol KL, Nordin J, Mullooly J, Lask R, Fillbrandt K, Iwane M. Influenza vaccination and reduction in hospitalizations for cardiac disease and stroke among the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1322–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reker DM, Rosen AK, Hoenig H, et al. The hazards of stroke case selection using administrative data. Med Care. 2002;40:96–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reisch LM, Fosse JS, Beverly K, et al. Training, quality assurance, and assessment of medical record abstraction in a multisite study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:546–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kind AJH, Anderson P, Hind J, Robbins J, Smith M. Omission of dysphagia therapies in hospital discharge communications. Dysphagia. 2011;26:49–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moore C, McGinn T, Halm E. Tying up loose ends: discharging patients with unresolved medical issues. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1305–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:121–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tjia J, Bonner A, Briesacher B, McGee S, Terrill E, Miller K. Medication discrepancies upon hospital to skilled nursing facility transitions. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24:630–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Snow V, Beck D, Budnitz T, et al. Transitions of Care Consensus policy statement: American College of Physicians, Society of General Internal Medicine, Society of Hospital Medicine, American Geriatrics Society, American College Of Emergency Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency. J Hosp Med. 2009;4:364–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Coit M, Katz J, McMahon G. The effect of workload reduction on the quality of residents’ discharge summaries. J Gen Intern Med. 2010:1–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy J.H. Kind
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carolyn T. Thorpe
    • 3
  • Justin A. Sattin
    • 4
  • Stacy E. Walz
    • 3
    • 5
  • Maureen A. Smith
    • 3
    • 6
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Geriatrics DivisionUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), William S. Middleton HospitalUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Population Health SciencesUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  4. 4.Department of NeurologyUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  5. 5.Department of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  6. 6.Department of Family MedicineUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  7. 7.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations