Skip to main content
Log in

Could Media Reports Include a Standardized Scale for Quality of Evidence?

  • Perspectives
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While some media reports offer accurate interpretations of clinical research, other reports are misleading. The uneven accuracy of medical reporting may act in concert with its sheer volume to confuse the lay public about which health messages are most important and evidence-based. I outline one possible step towards a solution: medical journals can embed quality of evidence ratings in article summaries and create incentives for inclusion of these ratings in lay media reports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Health News Review—Holding health and medical journalism accountable. Available at: www.healthnewsreview.org. Accessed November 22, 2010.

  2. Dentzer S. Communicating medical news–pitfalls of health care journalism. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson A, Bonevski B, Jones A, Henry D. Media reporting of health interventions: signs of improvement, but major problems persist. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4831.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonevski B, Wilson A, Henry DA. An analysis of news media coverage of complementary and alternative medicine. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Holtzman NA, Bernhardt BA, Mountcastle-Shah E, Rodgers JE, Tambor E, Geller G. The quality of media reports on discoveries related to human genetic diseases. Community Genet. 2005;8:133–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MacKenzie R, Chapman S, Barratt A, Holding S. "The news is [not] all good": misrepresentations and inaccuracies in Australian news media reports on prostate cancer screening. Med J Aust. 2007;187:507–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schwitzer G. A statement of principles for health care journalists. Am J Bioeth. 2004;4:W9–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barton MB, Miller T, Wolff T, et al. How to read the new recommendation statement: methods update from the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:123–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Braithwaite RS, Roberts MS, Justice AC. Incorporating quality of evidence into decision analytic modeling. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:133–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. National Committee for Quality Assurance. Available at: http://reportcard.ncqa.org/plan/external/Plansearch.aspx. Accessed November 22, 2010.

  11. Kolata G. Years later, no magic bullet against Alzheimer's Disease. New York Times August 29, 2010.

  12. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Using a drug facts box to communicate drug benefits and harms: two randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:516–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anonymous. Does the media support or sabotage health? Lancet 2009;373:604.

  14. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. Press releases: translating research into news. JAMA. 2002;287:2856–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Scott Braithwaite MD, MS, FACP.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braithwaite, R.S. Could Media Reports Include a Standardized Scale for Quality of Evidence?. J GEN INTERN MED 26, 543–545 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1599-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1599-z

KEY WORDS

Navigation