Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Multi-Institutional Quality Improvement Initiative to Transform Education for Chronic Illness Care in Resident Continuity Practices

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a gap between the need for patient-centered, evidence-based primary care for the large burden of chronic illness in the US, and the training of resident physicians to provide that care.

OBJECTIVE

To improve training for residents who provide chronic illness care in teaching practice settings.

DESIGN

US teaching hospitals were invited to participate in one of two 18-month Breakthrough Series Collaboratives—either a national Collaborative, or a subsequent California Collaborative—to implement the Chronic Care Model (CCM) and related curriculum changes in resident practices. Most practices focused on patients with diabetes mellitus. Educational redesign strategies with related performance measures were developed for curricular innovations anchored in the CCM. In addition, three clinical measures—HbA1c <7%, LDL <100 mg/dL, and blood pressure ≤130/80—and three process measures—retinal and foot examinations, and patient self-management goals—were tracked.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-seven teams from 37 self-selected teaching hospitals committed to implement the CCM in resident continuity practices; 41 teams focusing on diabetes improvement participated over the entire duration of one of the Collaboratives.

INTERVENTIONS

Teaching-practice teams—faculty, residents and staff—participated in Collaboratives by attending monthly calls and regular 2-day face-to-face meetings with the other teams. The national Collaborative faculty led calls and meetings. Each team used rapid cycle quality improvement (PDSA cycles) to implement the CCM and curricular changes. Teams reported education and clinical performance measures monthly.

RESULTS

Practices underwent extensive redesign to establish CCM elements. Education measures tracked substantial development of CCM-related learning. The clinical and process measures improved, however inconsistently, during the Collaboratives.

CONCLUSIONS

These initiatives suggest that systematic practice redesign for implementing the CCM along with linked educational approaches are achievable in resident continuity practices. Improvement of clinical outcomes in such practices is daunting but achievable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the twenty-first century. Washington: The National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holman H. Chronic disease—The need for a new clinical education. JAMA. 2004;292:1057–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stevens DP, Wagner EH. Transform residency training in chronic illness care—now. Acad Med. 2006;81:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stevens DP, Sixta CS, Wagner EH, Bowen JL. The evidence is at hand for improving care in settings where residents train. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:1116–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for chronic disease. Millbank Quarterly. 1996;74:511–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McCulloch DK, Price MJ, Hindmarsh MA, Wagner EH. Improvement in diabetes care using an integrated population-based approach in a primary care setting. Dis Manage. 2000;3:75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff. 2001;20:64–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner WH. Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Aff. 2009;28:75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. The Breakthrough Series: IHI’s Collaborative Model for Achieving Breakthrough Improvement. 2003.

  10. Bonomi AE, Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, Von Korff M. Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:791–820.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, David C, Bonomi AE, Provost L, McCulloch D, Carver P, Sixta C. Quality improvement in chronic illness care: A collaborative approach. J Qual Improvement. 2001;27:63–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. http://www.ahrq.gov//populations/chroniccaremodel. Accessed April 7, 2010

  13. Bowen JL, Stevens DP, Provost L, Sixta CS, Johnson JK, Woods DM, Wagner EH. Assessing chronic illness care education (ACIC-E): A tool for tracking educational redesign for improving chronic care education. J Gen Intern Med 2010;XX:XX-XX

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bowen JL, Stevens DP, Sixta CS, Provost L, Johnson JK, Woods DM, Wagner EH. Developing measures of educational change for collaborative teams implementing the Chronic Care Model in teaching practices. J Gen Intern Med 2010; XX:XX-XX

  15. Benneyan JC, Lloyd RC, Plsek PE. Statistical process control as a tool for research and healthcare improvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:458–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Daumschroder LJ, Banaszak-Holl J, Kowalski CP, Forman J, Saint S, Krein SL. The role of the “champion” in infection prevention: results from a multisite qualitative study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:434–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Warm E, Schauer DP, Diers T, Mathis BR, Neirouz Y, Boex J, Rouan GW. The ambulatory long-block: An Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Educational Innovations Project (EIP). J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:921–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Batalden P, Leach D, Swing S, Dreyfus H, Dreyfus S. General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education. Health Aff. 2002;21:103–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Davidoff F. Heterogeneity is not always noise: Lessons from improvement. JAMA. 2009;302:2580–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grant RW, Buse JB, Meigs JB, University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Diabetes Benchmarking Project Team. Quality of diabetes care in U.S. academic medical centers: low rates of medical regimen change. Diab Care. 2005;28(2):337–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nembhard IM, Alexander JA, Hoff TJ, Ramanujam R. Why does the quality of health care continue to lag? Insights from management research. Academy of Management Perspectives. 2009;23(2):24–42.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Feifer C, Mora A, White B, Barnett BP. Challenges to improving chronic disease care and training in residencies. Acad Med. 2006;81:696–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Landon BE, Hicks LS, O’Malley AJ, Lieu TA, Keegan T, McNeil BJ, Guadagnoli E. Improving the management of chronic disease at community health canters. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:921–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Renders CM, Valk GD, Franse LV, Schellevis FG, vanEijk JT, van der Wal G. Long-term effectiveness of a quality improvement program for patients with Type 2 diabetes in general practice. Diab Care. 2001;24(8):1365–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dearinger AT, Wilson JF, Griffith CH, Scutchfield FD. The effect of resident continuity on diabetes outcomes in a resident community clinic. J Gen Int Med. 2008.

  26. Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Baker L, Sharp S, Bronner K. Evaluating the efficiency of California providers in caring for patients with chronic illness. Health Aff. 2005;24(Suppl 3):526–4.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Davidoff F, Batalden P, Stevens D, Ogrinc G, Mooney S, SQUIRE development group. Publication guidelines for quality improvement in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:i3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This report employed the SQUIRE publication guidelines for reporting healthcare quality improvement research27. The national staff and faculty for both initiatives were supported in large measure by generous grants to the AAMC from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the California HealthCare Foundation. In addition, the AAMC and the MacColl Institute provided in kind support for the Collaborative co-chairs (EW and DS) as well as additional administrative support. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Delmarva Foundation provided support for development of the web-based “Tool kit for developing the Chronic Care Model in an academic environment.”

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David P. Stevens MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stevens, D.P., Bowen, J.L., Johnson, J.K. et al. A Multi-Institutional Quality Improvement Initiative to Transform Education for Chronic Illness Care in Resident Continuity Practices. J GEN INTERN MED 25 (Suppl 4), 574–580 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1392-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1392-z

KEY WORDS

Navigation