Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 489–494 | Cite as

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis among Medical Patients at US Hospitals

  • Michael B. Rothberg
  • Maureen Lahti
  • Penelope S. Pekow
  • Peter K. Lindenauer
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Chemoprophylaxis is recommended for medical patients at moderate to high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and is now a requirement of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. To see who receives prophylaxis and how far hospitals will need to go to meet this requirement, we examined VTE prophylaxis patterns at US hospitals.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with seven medical diagnoses considered to carry moderate to high risk of VTE at 376 acute care facilities in 2004–2005. We excluded patients on warfarin or with hospital stays of <2 days. VTE prophylaxis was assessed by billing codes for any heparin or compression device. We classified patient risk using a VTE risk prediction model.

Results

Of 351,535 patients included, 36% received prophylaxis by hospital day 2. Prophylaxis rates were highest among patients with certain VTE risk factors, including mechanical ventilation (67%), restraints (57%), central lines (55%), obesity (46%), and prior VTE (44%). The median hospital rate was 31% (IQR 19% to 42%); only 3% of hospitals had rates >70%. Compared to patients at low risk of VTE (<0.05%), patients at high risk (>1.0%) were more likely to receive prophylaxis (52% vs. 34%, p < 0.001). Hospitals with high rates of prescribing for high-risk patients also had high rates for low-risk patients.

Conclusions

VTE prophylaxis rates at US hospitals are substantially below Joint Commission targets, even for patients at highest risk of VTE.

Key words

venous thromboembolism (VTE) hospital mortality chemoprophylaxis 

References

  1. 1.
    Samama MM, Cohen AT, Darmon JY, et al. A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in medical patients with enoxaparin study group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:793–800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition). Chest. 2008;133:381S–453S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wein L, Wein S, Haas SJ, Shaw J, Krum H. Pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1476–1486.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stratton MA, Anderson FA, Bussey HI, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: Adherence to the 1995 American college of chest physicians consensus guidelines for surgical patients. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:334–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keane MG, Ingenito EP, Goldhaber SZ. Utilization of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the medical intensive care unit. Chest. 1994;106:13–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldhaber SZ, Dunn K, MacDougall RC. New onset of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients at Brigham and Women’s Hospital is caused more often by prophylaxis failure than by withholding treatment. Chest. 2000;118:1680–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tapson VF, Decousus H, Pini M, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients: Findings from the international medical prevention registry on venous thromboembolism. Chest. 2007;132:936–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann JF, et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): A multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2008;371:387–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Core Measure Set. 2009.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rothberg MB, Pekow PS, Liu F, et al. Potentially inappropriate medication use in hospitalized elders. J Hosp Med. 2008;3:91–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cook D, Tkaczyk A, Lutz K, McMullin J, Haynes RB, Douketis J. Thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized medical patients: A multicenter qualitative study. J Hosp Med. 2009;4:269–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maynard G, Stein J. Preventing Hospital-Acquired Venous Thromboembolism: A Guide for Effective Quality Improvement. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dunn AS, Brenner A, Halm EA. The magnitude of an iatrogenic disorder: A systematic review of the incidence of venous thromboembolism for general medical inpatients. Thromb Haemost. 2006;95:758–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schuurman B, den Heijer M, Nijs AM. Thrombosis prophylaxis in hospitalised medical patients: Does prophylaxis in all patients make sense? Neth J Med. 2000;56:171–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bergmann JF, Segrestaa JM, Caulin C. Prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism. BMJ. 1992;305:1156.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael B. Rothberg
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Maureen Lahti
    • 4
  • Penelope S. Pekow
    • 1
    • 4
  • Peter K. Lindenauer
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Quality of Care ResearchBaystate Medical CenterSpringfieldUSA
  2. 2.Division of General Medicine and GeriatricsBaystate Medical CenterSpringfieldUSA
  3. 3.Department of MedicineTufts University School of MedicineBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of Massachusetts School of Public HealthAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations