Supporting Patient Autonomy: The Importance of Clinician-patient Relationships
- 5.2k Downloads
Personal autonomy is widely valued. Recognition of its vulnerability in health care contexts led to the inclusion of respect for autonomy as a key concern in biomedical ethics. The principle of respect for autonomy is usually associated with allowing or enabling patients to make their own decisions about which health care interventions they will or will not receive. In this paper, we suggest that a strong focus on decision situations is problematic, especially when combined with a tendency to stress the importance of patients’ independence in choosing. It distracts attention from other important aspects of and challenges to autonomy in health care. Relational understandings of autonomy attempt to explain both the positive and negative implications of social relationships for individuals’ autonomy. They suggest that many health care practices can affect autonomy by virtue of their effects not only on patients’ treatment preferences and choices, but also on their self-identities, self-evaluations and capabilities for autonomy. Relational understandings de-emphasise independence and facilitate well-nuanced distinctions between forms of clinical communication that support and that undermine patients’ autonomy. These understandings support recognition of the value of good patient-professional relationships and can enrich the specification of the principle of respect for autonomy.
KEY WORDSpersonal autonomy professional-patient relations clinical ethics relationship-centred care
The authors receive salary support from their respective universities. Vikki Entwistle's post is part-funded via the Alliance for Self Care Research, which is funded by the Scottish Funding Council, Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates and NHS Education Scotland. Alan Cribb currently holds an AHRC Knowledge Transfer Fellowship relating to patient involvement. Kirsten McCaffery is supported by Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NH&MRC Career Development Award 40286 and Program Grant no. 402764 to the Screening and Test Evaluation Program).
This work was presented in part at a conference on “Enhancing decision making in healthcare practice” organised by and held at the University of Stirling on 29 September 2009.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors are aware of any conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, that could, either directly or indirectly, purposefully or inadvertently, affect the development or reporting of their scholarly activity.
- 1.Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
- 2.Pellegrino ED, Thomasma D. The virtues in medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.Google Scholar
- 3.Sherwin S. A relational approach to autonomy in healthcare. In: Sherwin S, and the Feminist Health Care Ethics Research Network, eds. The politics of women's health: exploring agency and autonomy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press; 1998:19–47.Google Scholar
- 4.Schneider CE. The practice of autonomy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.Google Scholar
- 5.Dodds S. Choice and control in feminist bioethics. In: Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, eds. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:213–35.Google Scholar
- 10.O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, Barry M, Col NF, Eden KD, Entwistle VA, Fiset V, Holmes-Rovner M, Khangura S, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner D. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009 issue 1.Google Scholar
- 13.Mackenzie C, Stoljar N (Eds) Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
- 14.Meyers DT. Self, society and personal choice. New York: Columbia University Press; 1989.Google Scholar
- 16.McLeod C. Self trust and reproductive autonomy. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2002.Google Scholar
- 17.Benson P. Feeling crazy’: self worth and the social character of responsibility. In: Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, eds. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:72–93.Google Scholar
- 18.Carel H. Illness: the cry of the flesh. Stocksfield: Acumen; 2008.Google Scholar
- 19.Roe D, Davidson L. Self and narrative in schizophrenia: time to author a new story. In: Rapport F, Wainwright P, eds. The self in health and illness. Oxford: Routledge; 2006:83–95.Google Scholar
- 26.Mol A. The logic of care: health and the problem of patient choice. Abingdon: Routledge; 2008.Google Scholar