Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Update in New Medications for Primary Care

  • Updates
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  1. Drugs @ FDA. FDA approved drug products. (Accessed November 11, 2009, at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/Scripts/cder/DrugsatFDA.

  2. Rubins HB, Robins SJ, Collins D, et al. Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:410–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boekholdt SM, Sacks FM, Jukema JW, et al. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein TaqIB variant, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, cardiovascular risk, and efficacy of pravastatin treatment: individual patient meta-analysis of 13, 677 subjects. Circulation. 2005;111:278–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson A, Di Angelantonio E, Sarwar N, et al. Association of cholesteryl ester transfer protein genotypes with CETP mass and activity, lipid levels, and coronary risk. JAMA. 2008;299:2777–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barter PJ, Caulfield M, Eriksson M, et al. Effects of torcetrapib in patients at high risk for coronary events. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2109–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krishna R, Anderson MS, Bergman AJ, et al. Effect of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor, anacetrapib, on lipoproteins in patients with dyslipidaemia and on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure in healthy individuals: two double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled phase I studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1907–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bloomfield D, Carlson GL, Sapre A, et al. Efficacy and safety of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor anacetrapib as monotherapy and coadministered with atorvastatin in dyslipidemic patients. Am Heart J. 2009;157:352–60 e2.

  8. Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008;133:381S–453S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eriksson BI, Borris LC, Friedman RJ, et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2765–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kakkar AK, Brenner B, Dahl OE, et al. Extended duration rivaroxaban versus short-term enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372:31–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lassen MR, Ageno W, Borris LC, et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2776–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Turpie AG, Lassen MR, Davidson BL, et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty (RECORD4): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1673–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Buller HR, Lensing AW, Prins MH, et al. A dose-ranging study evaluating once-daily oral administration of the factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban in the treatment of patients with acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: the Einstein-DVT Dose-Ranging Study. Blood. 2008;112:2242–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mega J, Braunwald E, Mohanavelu S, et al. Rivaroxaban versus placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46): a randomised, double-blind, phase II trial. Lancet 2009.

  15. U.S. National Institutes of Health. Clinical Trials.gov. Accessed June 25, 2009.

  16. Lassen LH, Haderslev PA, Jacobsen VB, Iversen HK, Sperling B, Olesen J. CGRP may play a causative role in migraine. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:54–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Olesen J, Diener HC, Husstedt IW, et al. Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraine. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1104–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ho TW, Mannix LK, Fan X, et al. Randomized controlled trial of an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, MK-0974, in acute treatment of migraine. Neurology. 2008;70:1304–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ho TW, Ferrari MD, Dodick DW, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of MK-0974 (telcagepant), a new oral antagonist of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, compared with zolmitriptan for acute migraine: a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-treatment trial. Lancet. 2008;372:2115–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:193–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998;352:837–53.

  22. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998;352:854–65.

  23. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2545–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2560–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shaw JS, Wilmot RL, Kilpatrick ES. Establishing pragmatic estimated GFR thresholds to guide metformin prescribing. Diabet Med. 2007;24:1160–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh S, Loke YK, Furberg CD. Long-term risk of cardiovascular events with rosiglitazone: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2007;298:1189–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. What are the key statistics for breast cancer? American Cancer Society. 2009. (Accessed November 11, 2009, at http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_4_1X_What_are_the_key_statistics_for_breast_cancer_5.asp?sitearea=

  28. Hickey M, Saunders C, Partridge A, Santoro N, Joffe H, Stearns V. Practical clinical guidelines for assessing and managing menopausal symptoms after breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1669–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Barron TI, Connolly R, Bennett K, Feely J, Kennedy MJ. Early discontinuation of tamoxifen: a lesson for oncologists. Cancer. 2007;109:832–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wyon Y, Wijma K, Nedstrand E, Hammar M. A comparison of acupuncture and oral estradiol treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2004;7:153–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang MI, Nir Y, Chen B, Schnyer R, Manber R. A randomized controlled pilot study of acupuncture for postmenopausal hot flashes: effect on nocturnal hot flashes and sleep quality. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:700–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Irvin JH, Domar AD, Clark C, Zuttermeister PC, Friedman R. The effects of relaxation response training on menopausal symptoms. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;17:202–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Elkins G, Marcus J, Stearns V, Hasan Rajab M. Pilot evaluation of hypnosis for the treatment of hot flashes in breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2007;16:487–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stearns V, Beebe KL, Iyengar M, Dube E. Paroxetine controlled release in the treatment of menopausal hot flashes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289:2827–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Loprinzi CL, Sloan JA, Perez EA, et al. Phase III evaluation of fluoxetine for treatment of hot flashes. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1578–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Loprinzi CL, Kugler JW, Sloan JA, et al. Venlafaxine in management of hot flashes in survivors of breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;356:2059–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pandya KJ, Morrow GR, Roscoe JA, et al. Gabapentin for hot flashes in 420 women with breast cancer: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:818–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pandya KJ, Raubertas RF, Flynn PJ, et al. Oral clonidine in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer experiencing tamoxifen-induced hot flashes: a University of Rochester Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program study. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:788–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Suvanto-Luukkonen E, Koivunen R, Sundstrom H, et al. Citalopram and fluoxetine in the treatment of postmenopausal symptoms: a prospective, randomized, 9-month, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Menopause. 2005;12:18–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gordon PR, Kerwin JP, Boesen KG, Senf J. Sertraline to treat hot flashes: a randomized controlled, double-blind, crossover trial in a general population. Menopause. 2006;13:568–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Biglia N, Kubatzki F, Sgandurra P, et al. Mirtazapine for the treatment of hot flushes in breast cancer survivors: a prospective pilot trial. Breast J. 2007;13:490–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Stearns V, Johnson MD, Rae JM, et al. Active tamoxifen metabolite plasma concentrations after coadministration of tamoxifen and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1758–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Preskorn SH, Shah R, Neff M, Golbeck AL, Choi J. The potential for clinically significant drug-drug interactions involving the CYP 2D6 system: effects with fluoxetine and paroxetine versus sertraline. J Psychiatr Pract. 2007;13:5–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jin Y, Desta Z, Stearns V, et al. CYP2D6 genotype, antidepressant use, and tamoxifen metabolism during adjuvant breast cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:30–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stearns V. Clinical update: new treatments for hot flushes. Lancet. 2007;369:2062–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Butt DA, Lock M, Lewis JE, Ross S, Moineddin R. Gabapentin for the treatment of menopausal hot flashes: a randomized controlled trial. Menopause. 2008;15:310–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nelson HD, Vesco KK, Haney E, et al. Nonhormonal therapies for menopausal hot flashes: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295:2057–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kendall A, Dowsett M, Folkerd E, Smith I. Caution: Vaginal estradiol appears to be contraindicated in postmenopausal women on adjuvant aromatase inhibitors. Ann Oncol. 2006;17:584–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Weisberg E, Ayton R, Darling G, et al. Endometrial and vaginal effects of low-dose estradiol delivered by vaginal ring or vaginal tablet. Climacteric. 2005;8:83–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Mathias C. Cardeal Mendes CM, Ponde de Sena E, et al. An open-label, fixed-dose study of bupropion effect on sexual function scores in women treated for breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2006;17:1792–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hillner BE, Ingle JN, Chlebowski RT, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2003 update on the role of bisphosphonates and bone health issues in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4042–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dawson-Hughes B, Tosteson AN, Melton LJ 3rd, et al. Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:449–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tosteson AN, Melton LJ 3rd, Dawson-Hughes B, et al. Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:437–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH, et al. Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators. JAMA 1999;282:637–45.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Cummings SR, Eckert S, Krueger KA, et al. The effect of raloxifene on risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: results from the MORE randomized trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation. JAMA. 1999;281:2189–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Drugs for hypertension. Treatment Guidelines from the The Medical Letter 2009;7:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ernst ME, Carter BL, Goerdt CJ, et al. Comparative antihypertensive effects of hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone on ambulatory and office blood pressure. Hypertension. 2006;47:352–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs. chlorthalidone: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2000;283:1967–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group. JAMA 1991;265:3255–64.

  60. Messerli FH, Bangalore S. Antihypertensive efficacy of aliskiren: is hydrochlorothiazide an appropriate benchmark? Circulation. 2009;119:371–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Jamerson K, Weber MA, Bakris GL, et al. Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2417–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Maronde RF, Milgrom M, Vlachakis ND, Chan L. Response of thiazide-induced hypokalemia to amiloride. JAMA. 1983;249:237–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Langford HG, Schlundt D, Levine K. Sodium restriction in hypertension. Compr Ther. 1984;10:6–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Beckett NS, Peters R, Fletcher AE, et al. Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1887–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Michelle Agresti, Pharm D for her review of the new drugs portion of the manuscript and helpful suggestions.

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Smetana serves as a consultant to SafeMed. Dr. Sillman reports no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Shapiro 621D, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, USA

    Gerald W. Smetana MD

  2. Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Jane S. Sillman MD

Authors
  1. Gerald W. Smetana MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jane S. Sillman MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald W. Smetana MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smetana, G.W., Sillman, J.S. Update in New Medications for Primary Care. J GEN INTERN MED 25, 261–269 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1209-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1209-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation