Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 235–242 | Cite as

The Effects of Guided Care on the Perceived Quality of Health Care for Multi-morbid Older Persons: 18-Month Outcomes from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Cynthia M. Boyd
  • Lisa Reider
  • Katherine Frey
  • Daniel Scharfstein
  • Bruce Leff
  • Jennifer Wolff
  • Carol Groves
  • Lya Karm
  • Stephen Wegener
  • Jill Marsteller
  • Chad Boult
Original Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The quality of health care for older Americans with chronic conditions is suboptimal.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of “Guided Care” on patient-reported quality of chronic illness care.

DESIGN

Cluster-randomized controlled trial of Guided Care in 14 primary care teams.

PARTICIPANTS

Older patients of these teams were eligible to participate if, based on analysis of their recent insurance claims, they were at risk for incurring high health-care costs during the coming year. Small teams of physicians and their at-risk older patients were randomized to receive either Guided Care (GC) or usual care (UC).

INTERVENTION

“Guided Care” is designed to enhance the quality of health care by integrating a registered nurse, trained in chronic care, into a primary care practice to work with 2–5 physicians in providing comprehensive chronic care to 50–60 multi-morbid older patients.

MEASUREMENTS

Eighteen months after baseline, interviewers blinded to group assignment administered the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey by telephone. Logistic and linear regression was used to evaluate the effect of the intervention on patient-reported quality of chronic illness care.

RESULTS

Of the 13,534 older patients screened, 2,391 (17.7%) were eligible to participate in the study, of which 904 (37.8%) gave informed consent and were cluster-randomized. After 18 months, 95.3% and 92.2% of the GC and UC recipients who remained alive and eligible completed interviews. Compared to UC recipients, GC recipients had twice greater odds of rating their chronic care highly (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.30–3.50, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Guided Care improves self-reported quality of chronic health care for multi-morbid older persons.

KEY WORDS

quality of care chronic illness older 

References

  1. 1.
    Norris SL, High K, Gill TM, et al. Health care for older Americans with multiple chronic conditions: A research agenda. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(1):149–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001:364.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reuben DB, Shekelle PG, Wenger NS. Quality of care for older persons at the dawn of the third millennium. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(7 Suppl):S346–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyd C, Darer J, Boult C, Fried L, Boult L, Wu A. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid disease: Implications for pay for performance. JAMA. 2005;294(6):716–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peikes D, Chen A, Schore J, Brown R. Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries: 15 randomized trials. JAMA. 2009;301(6):603–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anderson GF. Medicare and chronic conditions. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(3):305–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bayliss EA, Edwards AE, Steiner JF, Main DS. Processes of care desired by elderly patients with multimorbidities. Fam Pract. 2008;25(4):287–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA. 2002;288(14):1775–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boyd CM, Boult C, Shadmi E, et al. Guided care for multi-morbid older adults. Gerontologist. 2007;47(5):697–704.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boyd CM, Shadmi E, Conwell LJ, et al. A pilot test of the effect of guided care on the quality of primary care experiences for multi-morbid older adults. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(5):536–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sylvia ML, Griswold M, Dunbar L, Boyd C, Park M, Boult C. Guided care: Cost and utilization outcomes in a pilot study. Dis Manag. 2008;11(1):29–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, Mahoney LD, Reid RJ, Greene SM. Development and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC). Med Care. 2005;43(5):436–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schmittdiel J, Mosen DM, Glasgow RE, Hibbard J, Remmers C, Bellows J. Patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) and improved patient-centered outcomes for chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(1):77–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boult C, Reider L, Frey K, et al. The early effects of "guided care" on the quality of health care for multi-morbid older persons: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2008;63(A)(3):321–7.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pope GC, Kautter J, Ellis RP, et al. Risk adjustment of medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model. Health Care Financ Rev. 2004;25(4):119–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ash AS, Ellis RP, Pope GC, et al. Using diagnoses to describe populations and predict costs. Health Care Financ Rev. 2000;21(3):7–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    National Committee for Quality Assurance. HEDIS Report. Available at http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/hpsc/mcs/hedis07.htm. Accessed August 28, 2009.
  18. 18.
    Roland M. Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care–a major experiment in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(14):1448–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Coleman EA, Parry C, Chalmers S, Min SJ. The care transitions intervention: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(17):1822–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coleman EA, Smith JD, Raha D, Min SJ. Posthospital medication discrepancies: Prevalence and contributing factors. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(16):1842–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boult C, Reider L, Frey K, Leff B, Boyd CM, Wolff JL, Wegener S, Marsteller J, Karm L, Scharfstein D. Early effects of "guided care" on the quality of health care for multimorbid older persons: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2008;63A(3):321–7.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wolff JL, Rand-Giovannetti E, Palmer S, Wegener S, Reider L, Frey K, Scharfstein D, Boult C. Caregiving and chronic care: The guided care program for families and friends. J Gerontol Med Sci. 2009;64A(7):785–91.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leff B, Reider L, Frick K, Scharfstein D, Boyd CM, Frey K, Karm L, Boult C. Guided care and the cost of complex health care. American Journal of Managed Care. 2009;15(8):555–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cynthia M. Boyd
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Lisa Reider
    • 1
  • Katherine Frey
    • 1
  • Daniel Scharfstein
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bruce Leff
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jennifer Wolff
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carol Groves
    • 3
  • Lya Karm
    • 3
  • Stephen Wegener
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jill Marsteller
    • 1
  • Chad Boult
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Kaiser-Permanente Mid-Atlantic StatesRockvilleUSA
  4. 4.Center on Aging and HealthBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations