Mentorship is perceived to play a significant role in the career development and productivity of academic clinicians, but little is known about the characteristics of mentorship. This knowledge would be useful for those developing mentorship programs.
To complete a systematic review of the qualitative literature to explore and summarize the development, perceptions and experiences of the mentoring relationship in academic medicine.
Medline, PsycINFO, ERIC, Scopus and Current Contents databases from the earliest available date to December 2008.
We included studies that used qualitative research methodology to explore the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. Two investigators independently assessed articles for relevance and study quality, and extracted data using standardized forms. No restrictions were placed on the language of articles.
A total of 8,487 citations were identified, 114 full text articles were assessed, and 9 articles were selected for review. All studies were conducted in North America, and most focused on the initiation and cultivation phases of the mentoring relationship. Mentoring was described as a complex relationship based on mutual interests, both professional and personal. Mentees should take an active role in the formation and development of mentoring relationships. Good mentors should be sincere in their dealings with mentees, be able to listen actively and understand mentees' needs, and have a well-established position within the academic community. Some of the mentoring functions aim at the mentees’ academic growth and others at personal growth. Barriers to mentoring and dysfunctional mentoring can be related to personal factors, relational difficulties and structural/institutional barriers.
Successful mentoring requires commitment and interpersonal skills of the mentor and mentee, but also a facilitating environment at academic medicine's institutions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Kram KE. Mentoring at work: developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, Il: Scott Foresman; 1985.
Allen TD, Eby LT, Poteet ML, Lentz E, Lima L. Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psycho. 2004;89:127–36.
Underhill CM. The effectiveness of mentoring programs in corporate settings: a meta-analytical review of the literature. J Vocat Behav. 2006;68:292–307.
Hall JC. Mentoring and young people: a literature review. Glasgow: University of Glasgow; 2003.
Hansford BC, Ehrich LC, Tennent L. Formal mentoring programs in education and other professions: a review of the literature. Educ Adm Q. 2004;40:518–40.
Dorsey LE, Baker CM. Mentoring undergraduate nursing students: assessing the state of the science. Nurse Educ. 2004;29:260–5.
International Working Party to Promote and Revitalise Academic Medicine. ICRAM (The International Campaign to Revitalise Academic Medicine): agenda setting. BMJ. 2004;329:787–9.
Sambunjak D, Straus S, Marušić A. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296:1103–15.
Buddeberg-Fischer B, Herta KD. Formal mentoring programmes for medical students and doctors—a review of the Medline literature. Med Teach. 2006;28:248–57.
Standing Committee on Post-graduate Medical and Dental Education. An enquiry into mentoring supporting doctors and dentists at work. London: SCOPME; 1998.
Berk RA, Berg J, Mortimer R, Walton-Moss B, Yeo TP. Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Acad Med. 2005;80:66–71.
Bhagia J, Tinsley JA. The mentoring partnership. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:535–7.
Rodenhauser P, Rudisill JR, Dvorak R. Skills for mentors and protégés applicable to psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2000;24:14–27.
Detsky AS, Baerlocher MO. Academic mentoring—how to give it and how to get it. JAMA. 2007;297:2134–6.
Barondess JA. On mentoring. J R Soc Med. 1997;90:347–9.
Mishler EG. Meaning in context: is there any other kind? Harv Educ Rev. 1979;49:1–19.
Healy CC, Welchert AJ. Mentoring relations: a definition to advance research and education. Educ Res. 1990;19:17–21.
Jensen LA, Allen MN. A synthesis of qualitative research on wellness-illness. Qual Health Res. 1994;4:349–68.
Bondas T, Hall EOC. Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:113.
Nicholas DB, Globerman J, Antle BJ, McNeill T, Lach LM. Processes of metastudy: a study of psychosocial adaptation to childhood chronic health conditions. International journal of qualitative methods. 2006;5(1), Article 5. Retrieved: August 3rd 2009 from http://www.ualberta.ca/∼iiqm/backissues/5_1/PDF/NICHOLAS.PDF (Accessed October 2009).
Sandelowski M, Barroso J. Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York, NY: Springer; 2007.
Bates MJ. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Rev. 1989;13:407–24.
Benson CA, Morahan PS, Sachdeva AK, Richman RC. Effective faculty preceptoring and mentoring during reorganization of an academic medical center. Med Teach. 2002;24:550–7.
Hauer KE, Teherani A, Dechet A, Aagaard EM. Medical students' perceptions of mentoring: a focus-group analysis. Med Teach. 2005;27:732–4.
Jackson VA, Palepu A, Szalacha L, Caswell C, Carr PL, Inui T. “Having the right chemistry”: a qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2003;78:328–34.
Koopman RJ, Thiedke CC. Views of family medicine department Chairs about mentoring junior faculty. Med Teach. 2005;27:734–7.
Leslie K, Lingard L, Whyte S. Junior faculty experiences with informal mentoring. Med Teach. 2005;27:693–8.
Morzinski JA, Dier S, Bower DJ, Simpson DE. A descriptive, cross-sectional study of formal mentoring for faculty. Fam Med. 1996;28:434–8.
Rabatin JS, Lipkin M, Rubin AS, Schachter A, Nathan M, Kalet A. A year of mentoring in academic medicine: case report and qualitative analysis of 15 hours of meetings between a junior and senior faculty member. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:569–73.
Williams LL, Levine JB, Malhotra S, Holtzheimer P. The good-enough mentoring relationship. Acad Psychiatry. 2004;28:111–5.
Straus SE, Chatur F, Taylor M. Issues in the mentor-mentee relationship in academic medicine: qualitative study. Acad Med. 2009;84:135–9.
Godshalk VM, Sosik JJ. Mentoring and leadership. In: Ragins BR, Kram KE, eds. The handbook of mentoring at work: theory, research, and practice. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2007.
D'Abate CP, Eddy ER, Tannenbaum SI. What's in a name? A literature-based approach to understanding mentoring, coaching and constructs that describe developmental interactions. Human Resource Development Review. 2003;2:360–84.
Townsend KC, McWhirter BT. Connectedness: a review of the literature with implications for counseling, assessment and research. J Couns Dev. 2005;83:191–201.
Eby LT. Understanding relational problems in mentoring: a review and proposed investment model. In: Kram KE, Ragins BR, eds. The handbook of mentoring at work: theory, research, and practice. Los Angeles: Sage; 2007.
Atkinson P, Pugsley L. Making sense of ethnography and medical education. Med Educ. 2005;39:228–34.
Kennedy TJ, Lingard LA. Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Med Educ. 2006;40:101–8.
Kram KE. Phases of the mentor relationship. Acad Manag J. 1983;26:608–25.
We thank Ms Laure Perrier for her help in designing search strategies and retrieval of articles. Dr Sambunjak and Dr Marušić are financially supported in part by a grant from the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports (no. 216-1080314-0245) to Matko Marušić. Dr. Straus was supported by a Canada Research Chair.
Conflict of interest
The funders had no influence on the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review or approval of the manuscript. All of the authors are teachers at medical schools and have no competing interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Sambunjak, D., Straus, S.E. & Marusic, A. A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research on the Meaning and Characteristics of Mentoring in Academic Medicine. J GEN INTERN MED 25, 72–78 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1165-8
- academic medicine
- systematic review
- qualitative research