Nonverbal Sensitivity in Medical Students: Implications for Clinical Interactions

  • Judith A. Hall
  • Debra L. Roter
  • Danielle C. Blanch
  • Richard M. Frankel
Original Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinicians’ accuracy in perceiving nonverbal cues has potentially important consequences, but has received insufficient research.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relation of medical students’ nonverbal sensitivity to their gender and personal traits, as well as to their communication and impressions made during a standardized patient (SP) visit.

DESIGN

Psychometric testing, questionnaire, and observation.

SETTING

One US medical school.

PARTICIPANTS

Two-hundred seventy-five third-year medical students.

MEASUREMENTS

Nonverbal sensitivity and attitudes were measured using standard instruments. Communication during the SP visit was measured using trained coders and analogue patients who viewed the videotapes and rated the favorability of their impressions of the student.

RESULTS

Nonverbal sensitivity was higher in female than male students (P < 0.001) and was positively correlated with self-reported patient-centered attitudes (P < 0.01) and ability to name one’s own emotions (P < 0.05). It was also associated with less distressed (P < 0.05), more dominant (P < 0.001), and more engaged (P < 0.01) behavior by the SP, and with more liking of the medical student (P < 0.05) and higher ratings of compassion (P < 0.05) by the analogue patients. Correlations between nonverbal sensitivity and other variables were generally stronger and different for male than female students, but nonverbal sensitivity predicted analogue patients’ impressions similarly for male and female students.

CONCLUSION

Medical students’ nonverbal sensitivity was related to clinically relevant attitudes and behavioral style in a clinical simulation.

KEY WORDS

nonverbal sensitivity emotion recognition patient-centered behavior medical students standardized patients 

References

  1. 1.
    Roter DL, Hall JA. Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors: improving communication in medical visits. 2nd ed. Westport, CT: Praeger; 2006.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Griffin SJ, Kinmonth AL, Veltman MW, Gillard S, Grant J, Stewart M. Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:595–608.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mead N, Bower P. Measuring patient-centredness: a comparison of three observation-based instruments. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39:71–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roter DL, Hall JA. Physician gender and patient-centered communication: a critical review of empirical research. Ann Rev Public Health. 2004;25:497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hall JA, Harrigan JA, Rosenthal R. Nonverbal behavior in clinician-patient interaction. Applied Prev Psychol. 1995;4:21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roter DL, Frankel RM, Hall JA, Sluyter D. The expression of emotion through nonverbal behavior in medical visits. J General Int Med. 2006;21:S28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmid Mast M. On the importance of nonverbal communication in the physician-patient interaction. Pat Educ Couns. 2007;67:315–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bridges K, Goldberg D. Somatic presentation of DSM-III psychiatric disorders in primary care. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29:563–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ormel J, Giel R. Medical effects of nonrecognition of affective disorders in primary care. In: Sartorious N, et al, ed. Psychological disorders in general medical settings. Lewiston, NY: CJ Hogrefe; 1990:146–58.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schulberg HC, Burns BJ. Mental disorders in primary care: epidemiologic, diagnostic and treatment research directions. General Hosp Psychiat. 1988;10:79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hall JA, Stein TS, Roter DL, Rieser N. Inaccuracies in physicians’ perceptions of their patients. Med Care. 1999;37:1164–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hall JA, Horgan TG, Stein TS, Roter DL. Liking in the physician-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:69–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Merkel WT. Physician perception of patient satisfaction: do doctors know which patients are satisfied? Med Care. 1984;22:453–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    DiMatteo MR, Taranta A, Friedman HS, Prince LM. Predicting patient satisfaction from physicians’ nonverbal communication skill. Med Care. 1980;18:376–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    DiMatteo MR, Hays RD, Prince LM. Relationship of physicians’ nonverbal communication skill to patient satisfaction, appointment non-compliance, and physician workload. Health Psychol. 1986;5:581–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Robbins JM, Kirmayer LJ, Cathébras P, Yaffe MJ, Dworkind M. Physician characteristics and the recognition of depression and anxiety in primary care. Med Care. 1994;32:795–812.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tickle-Degnen L. Working well with others: the prediction of students’ clinical performance. Amer J Occup Ther. 1998;52:133–42.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roter DL, Erby LH, Hall JA, Larson S, Ellington L, Dudley W. Nonverbal sensitivity: consequences for learning and satisfaction in genetic counseling. Health Educ. 2008;108:397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hall JA, Bernieri FJ, eds. Interpersonal sensitivity: theory and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nowicki S, Duke MP. Individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect: the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy Scale. J Nonv Behav. 1994;18:9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nowicki S Jr, Duke MP. Nonverbal receptivity: the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy (DANVA). In: Hall JA, Bernieri FJ, eds. Interpersonal sensitivity: theory and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001:183–98.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rosenthal R, Hall JA, DiMatteo MR, Rogers PL, Archer D. Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: the PONS test. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1979.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hall JA, Andrzejewski SA, Yopchick JE. Psychosocial correlates of interpersonal sensitivity: a meta-analysis. J Nonverbal Behav. 2009;33:149–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Elfenbein HA, Foo MD, White J, Tan HH, Aik VC. Reading your counterpart: the benefit of emotion recognition accuracy for effectiveness in negotiation. J Nonv Behav. 2007;31:205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Byron K, Terranova S, Nowicki S Jr. Nonverbal emotion recognition and salespersons: linking ability to perceived and actual success. J Applied Social Psychol. 2007;37:2600–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marsh AA, Kozak MN, Ambady N. Accurate identification of fear facial expressions predicts prosocial behavior. Emotion. 2007;7:239–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Byron K. Male and female managers’ ability to ‘read’ emotions: relationships with supervisor’s performance ratings and subordinates’ satisfaction ratings. J Occup Org Psychol. 2007;80:713–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hall JA. Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychol Bull. 1978;85:845–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hall JA. Nonverbal sex differences: communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1984.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    McClure EB. A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents. Psychol Bull. 2000;126:424–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y. Physician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review. JAMA. 2002;288:756–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Van Zanten M, Boulet JR, McKinley D. Using standardized patients to assess the interpersonal skills of physicians: six years’ experience with a high-stakes certification examination. Health Communic. 2007;22:195–205.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, Barnard K, Putnam SM, Inui TS. The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39:49–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Salovey P, Mayer JD, Goldman SL, Turvey C, Palfai TP. In: Pennebaker JW, ed. Emotion, disclosure, and health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1995:125–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Krupat E, Frankel R, Stein T, Irish J. The Four Habits Coding Scheme: validation of an instrument to assess clinicians’ communication behavior. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;62:38–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ambady N, Bernieri FJ, Richeson JA. Toward a histology of social behavior: judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. Adv Experim Social Psychol. 2000;32:201–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ambady N, LaPlante D, Nguyen T, Rosenthal R, Chaumeton N, Levinson W. Surgeons’ tone of voice: a clue to malpractice. Surgery. 2002;132:5–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Haskard KB, Williams SL, DiMatteo MR, Heritage J, Rosenthal R. The provider’s voice: patient satisfaction and the content-filtered speech of nurses and physicians in primary medical care. J Nonv Behav. 2008;32:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hall JA, Roter DL, Blanch DC, Frankel RM. Observer-rated rapport in interactions between medical students and standardized patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76:323–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Roter DL, Larson S. The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;46:243–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Roter DL, Hall JA, Katz NR. Relations of physicians’ task and socioemotional behaviors to analogue patients’ satisfaction, recall, and impressions. Med Care. 1987;25:437–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schmid Mast M, Klockner C, Hall JA. Physician gender affects how physician nonverbal behavior is related to patient satisfaction. Med Care. 2008;46:1212–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nowicki S. DANVA 2: instruction manual for the receptive tests of the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy 2. Atlanta: Department of Psychology, Emory University: no date.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Evans BJ, Stanley RO, Burrows GD, Sweet B. Comparison of skills related to effectiveness of consultations: an Australian sample of medical students. Psychol Reports. 1987;61:419–22.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Evans BJ, Coman GJ, Stanley RO. Scores on the Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity: a sample of Australian medical students. Psychol Reports. 1988;62:903–6.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mechanic D, McAlpine DD, Rosenthal M. Are patients’ office visits with physicians getting shorter? NEJM. 2001;344:198–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bensing JM, van den Brink-Muinen A, de Bakker DH. Gender differences in practice style: a Dutch study of general practitioners. Med Care. 1993;31:219–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    DHHS. Publication No. (PHS) 80–1710. Characteristics of visits to female and male physicians. The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, United States, 1977, Series 13, Number 39, June 1980.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hall JA, Roter DL, Rand CS. Communication of affect between patient and physician. J Health Social Behav. 1981;22:18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Roter DL. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction, and compliance. Health Educ Monog. 1977;50:281–315.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989;27:S110–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Richard FD, Bond CF Jr, Stokes-Zoota JJ. One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Rev Gen Psychol. 2003;7:331–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hall JA. The PONS test and the psychometric approach to measuring interpersonal sensitivity. In: Hall JA, Bernieri FJ, eds. Interpersonal sensitivity: theory and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001:143–60.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Costanzo M. Training students to decode verbal and nonverbal cues: effects of confidence and performance. J Educ Psychol. 1992;84:308–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gillis JS, Bernieri FJ, Wooten E. The effects of stimulus medium and feedback on the judgment of rapport. Org Behav Hum Decis Processes. 1995;63:33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Satterfield JM, Hughes E. Emotion skills training for medical students: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2007;41:935–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith A. Hall
    • 1
  • Debra L. Roter
    • 2
  • Danielle C. Blanch
    • 1
  • Richard M. Frankel
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Psychology125 NI, Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations