Nonverbal Sensitivity in Medical Students: Implications for Clinical Interactions
- 745 Downloads
Clinicians’ accuracy in perceiving nonverbal cues has potentially important consequences, but has received insufficient research.
To examine the relation of medical students’ nonverbal sensitivity to their gender and personal traits, as well as to their communication and impressions made during a standardized patient (SP) visit.
Psychometric testing, questionnaire, and observation.
One US medical school.
Two-hundred seventy-five third-year medical students.
Nonverbal sensitivity and attitudes were measured using standard instruments. Communication during the SP visit was measured using trained coders and analogue patients who viewed the videotapes and rated the favorability of their impressions of the student.
Nonverbal sensitivity was higher in female than male students (P < 0.001) and was positively correlated with self-reported patient-centered attitudes (P < 0.01) and ability to name one’s own emotions (P < 0.05). It was also associated with less distressed (P < 0.05), more dominant (P < 0.001), and more engaged (P < 0.01) behavior by the SP, and with more liking of the medical student (P < 0.05) and higher ratings of compassion (P < 0.05) by the analogue patients. Correlations between nonverbal sensitivity and other variables were generally stronger and different for male than female students, but nonverbal sensitivity predicted analogue patients’ impressions similarly for male and female students.
Medical students’ nonverbal sensitivity was related to clinically relevant attitudes and behavioral style in a clinical simulation.
KEY WORDSnonverbal sensitivity emotion recognition patient-centered behavior medical students standardized patients
- 1.Roter DL, Hall JA. Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors: improving communication in medical visits. 2nd ed. Westport, CT: Praeger; 2006.Google Scholar
- 9.Ormel J, Giel R. Medical effects of nonrecognition of affective disorders in primary care. In: Sartorious N, et al, ed. Psychological disorders in general medical settings. Lewiston, NY: CJ Hogrefe; 1990:146–58.Google Scholar
- 17.Tickle-Degnen L. Working well with others: the prediction of students’ clinical performance. Amer J Occup Ther. 1998;52:133–42.Google Scholar
- 19.Hall JA, Bernieri FJ, eds. Interpersonal sensitivity: theory and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.Google Scholar
- 21.Nowicki S Jr, Duke MP. Nonverbal receptivity: the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy (DANVA). In: Hall JA, Bernieri FJ, eds. Interpersonal sensitivity: theory and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001:183–98.Google Scholar
- 22.Rosenthal R, Hall JA, DiMatteo MR, Rogers PL, Archer D. Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: the PONS test. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1979.Google Scholar
- 29.Hall JA. Nonverbal sex differences: communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1984.Google Scholar
- 32.Van Zanten M, Boulet JR, McKinley D. Using standardized patients to assess the interpersonal skills of physicians: six years’ experience with a high-stakes certification examination. Health Communic. 2007;22:195–205.Google Scholar
- 43.Nowicki S. DANVA 2: instruction manual for the receptive tests of the Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy 2. Atlanta: Department of Psychology, Emory University: no date.Google Scholar
- 44.Evans BJ, Stanley RO, Burrows GD, Sweet B. Comparison of skills related to effectiveness of consultations: an Australian sample of medical students. Psychol Reports. 1987;61:419–22.Google Scholar
- 45.Evans BJ, Coman GJ, Stanley RO. Scores on the Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity: a sample of Australian medical students. Psychol Reports. 1988;62:903–6.Google Scholar
- 48.DHHS. Publication No. (PHS) 80–1710. Characteristics of visits to female and male physicians. The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, United States, 1977, Series 13, Number 39, June 1980.Google Scholar
- 50.Roter DL. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction, and compliance. Health Educ Monog. 1977;50:281–315.Google Scholar
- 53.Hall JA. The PONS test and the psychometric approach to measuring interpersonal sensitivity. In: Hall JA, Bernieri FJ, eds. Interpersonal sensitivity: theory and measurement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001:143–60.Google Scholar