Skip to main content

Taking the Stress out of Morning Report: An Analytic Approach to the Differential Diagnosis

Journal of General Internal Medicine volume 24, pages 747–751 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Morning report is a traditional core teaching session in most departments of internal medicine where learners present cases to a facilitator who uses the material to teach clinical reasoning. It instills fear in both learners and teachers because they may embarrassingly miss diagnostic possibilities including even the actual diagnosis.

Aim

The two teaching tips described here enable the learner and the teacher to fall back on a routine approach to arriving at a differential diagnosis list.

Description

The first tip describes how to elicit the ten “focal findings” in the case that best summarize the data used to derive a diagnosis list. The second tip describes a matrix of etiologies and systems that can be used to generate the diagnostic probabilities.

Discussion

This approach is easy to teach and, where all else fails when coming up with a diagnosis, can be used to prompt the discussion of what is wrong with the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Brancati FL. The Art of Pimping. JAMA. 7 July 1989; 2621: 89–90.

  2. Detsky AS. The Art of Pimping. JAMA in press. 1 April 2009.

  3. Charlin B, Boshuizen HP, Custers EJ, Feltovich PJ. Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2007 Dec; 4112: 1178–84.

  4. Eva K. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2004 Jan; 391: 98–106.

  5. Bowen J. Educational strategies to promote clinical and diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 23; 35521: 2217–25.

  6. Eva KW. The ageing physician: changes in cognitive processing and their impact on medical practice. Acad Med. 2002; 77(Suppl): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

 

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Adrian G. Sacher MD & Allan S. Detsky MD PhD

  2. Department of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Allan S. Detsky MD PhD

  3. Departments of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital and University Health Network, 427-600 University Avenue, Toronto, M5G 1X5, ON, Canada

    Adrian G. Sacher MD

  4. Department of Medicine Mount Sinai Hospital, University Avenue, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Allan S. Detsky MD PhD

Authors
  1. Adrian G. Sacher MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Allan S. Detsky MD PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan S. Detsky MD PhD.

APPENDIX 1: QUICK REFERENCE CARD

APPENDIX 1: QUICK REFERENCE CARD

STEP 1: Identify Focal Findings

Three criteria:

  • This point adds or eliminates a diagnostic possibility.

  • This point’s diagnostic contribution has not been made by a previous one.

  • In general, no more than ten (10) focal findings should be selected per case.

These focal findings should also fall into one of the following categories:

  • The chief complaint.

  • Demographic data that will introduce, eliminate, or change the likelihood of different diagnoses.

  • Past medical conditions or medications that may primarily or secondarily produce the chief complaint described by the patient.

  • Elements of the history of present illness that influence the diagnostic possibilities such as temporal course and prominent symptoms.

  • Genetic and social risk factors that are related to a disease process that could produce the presentation described in the case.

  • Pertinent positives and negatives on physical examination and lab.

STEP 2: Review and Complete Hybrid Matrix

In Table 3 we show a blank hybrid matrix matrix.

Table 3 Hybrid Matrix Blank
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sacher, A.G., Detsky, A.S. Taking the Stress out of Morning Report: An Analytic Approach to the Differential Diagnosis. J GEN INTERN MED 24, 747–751 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-0953-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-0953-5

KEY WORDS

  • diagnostic reasoning
  • morning report
  • analytic approach