Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient Decision to Initiate Therapy for Osteoporosis: The Influence of Knowledge and Beliefs

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There are effective treatments to prevent osteoporotic fractures, but these treatments are underutilized.

Objective

To evaluate the influence of patient characteristics, perceptions, knowledge and beliefs about osteoporosis on the decision to initiate osteoporotic treatment.

Participants

We identified female members of a managed care plan who had a dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone density test and fulfilled World Health Organization criteria for osteoporosis. Patients were excluded if they received osteoporotic medications in the prior 6 months.

Measurements

Patients were sent a questionnaire that included items assessing satisfaction with physician–patient communication, trust in the physician, osteoporosis knowledge and beliefs, beliefs about prescription medications, and perceptions of barriers to medication use. Administrative electronic health records were used to identify prescription drug use and health care utilization.

Results

Two hundred and thirty-six women returned surveys and research authorization forms out of 465 contacted for participation. One hundred and thirty-five (57.2%) filled a prescription for an osteoporotic drug in the first 3 months after the DXA exam. The largest differences between initiators and non-initiators were in beliefs in the benefits of medications, and distrust of medications, with initiators believing more strongly in the benefits and effectiveness of medications (p < .001), and non-initiators reporting more distrust of medications (p < .001). Osteoporosis knowledge and the belief that osteoporosis is a serious disease were also related to therapy initiation in bivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Only 57% of patients initiated osteoporotic medication within 3 months of diagnosis. The decision to start osteoporosis treatment appeared to be related to a patient’s beliefs in the effectiveness of osteoporosis medications and distrust of medications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Committee for Quality Assurance. Medicare HEDIS 2006 means, percentiles and ratios. http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/494/Default.aspx. Accessed August 15, 2008.

  2. McCombs JS, Thiebaud P, McLaughlin-Miley C, Shi J. Compliance with drug therapies for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Maturitas. 2004;48:271–287.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tosteson AN, Grove MR, Hammond CS, Moncur MM, Ray GT, Hebert GM, Pressman AR, Ettinger B. Early discontinuation of treatment for osteoporosis. Am J Med. 2003;115:209–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Dolovich L, Lau E, Adachi JD. Patient adherence to osteoporosis medications; problems, consequences and management strategies. Drugs Aging. 2007;24:37–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Solomon DH, Avorn J, Katz JN, Finkelstein JS, Arnold M, Polinski JM, Brookhart MA. Compliance with osteoporosis medications. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2414–2419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Siris ES, Harris ST, Rosen CJ, Barr CE, Arvesen JN, Abbott TA, Silverman S. Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:1013–1022.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF, Raggio G, Naujoks C. The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporos Int. 2004;15:1003–1008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huybrechts KF, Ishak KJ, Caro JJ. Assessment of compliance with osteoporosis treatment and its consequences in a managed care population. Bone. 2006;38:922–928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Briesacher BA, Andrade SE, Yood RA, Kahler KH. Consequences of poor compliance with bisphosphonates. Bone. 2007;41:882–887.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Haynes RB, McKibbon KA, Kanani R. Systematic review of randomized trials of interventions to assist patients to follow prescriptions for medications. Lancet. 1996;348:383–386. erratum Lancet 1997;349:1180.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heidenreich PA. Patient adherence: the next frontier in quality improvement. Am J Med. 2004;117:130–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peterson AM, Takiya L, Finley R. Meta-analysis of trials of interventions to improve medication adherence. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003;60:657–665.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Van Royen P, Denekens J. Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive review. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2001;26:331–342.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:487–497.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brookhart MA, Avorn J, Katz JN, Finkelstein JS, Arnold M, Polinski JM, Patrick AR, Mogun H, Solomon DH. Gaps in treatment among users of osteoporosis medications: The dynamics of noncompliance. Am J Med. 2007;120:251–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yood RA, Emani S, Reed JI, Lewis BE, Charpentier M, Lydick E. Compliance with pharmacologic therapy for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:965–968.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Badamgarav E, Fitzpatrick LA. A new look at osteoporosis outcomes: The influence of treatment, compliance, persistence, and adherence. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:1009–1012.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Unson CG, Siccion E, Gaztambide J, Gaztambide S, Mahoney Trella P, Prestwood K. Nonadherence and osteoporosis treatment preferences of older women: a qualitative study. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003;12:1037–1045.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weiss TW, Gold DT, Silverman SL, McHorney CA. An evaluation of patient preferences for osteoporosis medication attributes: Results form the PREFER US Study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22:949–960.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson MJ. The medication adherence model: a guide for assessing medication taking. Res Theory Nurse Pract. 2002;16:179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dowell J, Hudson H. A qualitative study of medication-taking behaviour in primary care. Fam Prac. 1997;14:369–375.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Benson J, Britten N. Patients’ decisions about whether or not to take antihypertensive drugs: Qualitative study. BMJ. 2002;325:873.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pound P, Britten N, Morgan M, Yardley L, Pope C, Daker-White G, Campbell R. Resisting medicines: A synthesis of qualitative studies on medicine taking. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:133–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Svensson S, Kjellgren KI, Ahlner J, Saljo R. Reasons for adherence with antihypertensive medication. Int J Cardiol. 2000;76:157–163.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. DiMatteo MR, Haskard KB, Williams SL. Health beliefs, disease severity, and patient adherence. A meta-analysis. Med Care. 2007;45:521–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cline RR, Farley JF, Hansen RA, Schommer JC. Osteoporosis beliefs and antiresorptive medication use. Maturitas. 2005;50:196–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies; Development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613–619.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. American Board of Internal Medicine. Final report on the patient satisfaction questionnaire project. Washington DC. 1989.

  30. Dugan E, Trachtenberg F, Hall MA. Development of abbreviated measures to assess patient trust in a physician, a health insurer, and the medical profession. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Werner P. Knowledge about osteoporosis: Assessment, correlates and outcomes. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:115–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mazor KM, Fischer MA, Billings-Gagliardi S. Initial acceptance of treatment with antihypertensive medication: the importance of communication, trust and beliefs. J Commun Healthcare. 2008;1:311–323.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Brookhart MA, Patrick AR, Schneeweiss S, Avorn J, Dormuth C, Shrank W, van Wijk BL, Cadarette SM, Canning CF, Solomon DH. Physician follow-up and provider continuity are associated with long-term medication adherence: a study of the dynamics of statin use. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:847–852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Brookhart MA, Patrick AR, Dormuth C, Avorn J, Shrank W, Cadarette SM, Solomon DH. Adherence to lipid-lowering therapy and the use of preventive health services: An investigation of the healthy user effect. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:348–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rossini M, Bianchi G, Di Munno O, Giannini S, Minisola S, Sinigaglia L, Adami S. Treatment of osteoporosis in clinical practice (TOP) study group. Determinants of adherence to osteoporosis in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:914–921.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Segal E, Tamir A, Ish-Shalom S. Compliance of osteoporotic patients with different treatment regimens. Isr Med Assoc J. 2003;5:859–862.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fraenkel L, Gulanski B, Wittink D. Patient treatment preferences for osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55:729–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Brooke Harrow PhD for helpful review of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

This study was funded by a grant from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Robert Yood has received financial support from Merck for pharmaceutical drug trials, from Novartis for a research study, and from Procter and Gamble for consultancy. Merck, Novartis, and Procter and Gamble are makers of drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis. Kathleen Mazor has no potential conflicts of interest to report. Susan Andrade has received financial support (through grants and consultancies) from Merck and Novartis. Srinivas Emani has no potential conflicts of interest to report. Wing Chan and Kristijan Kahler are employees of Novartis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert A. Yood MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yood, R.A., Mazor, K.M., Andrade, S.E. et al. Patient Decision to Initiate Therapy for Osteoporosis: The Influence of Knowledge and Beliefs. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 1815–1821 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0772-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0772-0

KEY WORDS

Navigation