Skip to main content

Changes in Medical Students’ Attitudes Towards End-of-Life Decisions Across Different Years of Medical Training

Journal of General Internal Medicine volume 23, pages 1608–1614 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decisions to forgo life-sustaining medical treatments in terminally ill patients are challenging, but ones that all doctors must face. Few studies have evaluated the impact of medical training on medical students’ attitudes towards end-of-life decisions and none have compared them with an age-matched group of non-medical students.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of medical education on medical students’ attitudes towards end-of-life decisions in acutely ill patients.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Four hundred and two students at The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

MEASUREMENTS

Completion of a questionnaire focused on end-of-life decisions.

MAIN RESULTS

The number of students who felt that cardiopulmonary resuscitation must always be provided was higher in non-medical students (76/90 (84%)) and medical students with less training (67/84 (80%) in year 1 vs. 18/67 (27%) in year 5) (p < 0.001). Discontinuing life-support therapy was more accepted among senior medical students compared to junior medical and non-medical students (27/66 (41%) in year 5 vs. 18/83 (22%) in year 1 and 20/90 (22%) in non-medical students) (p = 0.003). An unexpectedly large proportion of non-medical students (57/89 (64%)) and year 1 medical students (42/84 (50%)) found it acceptable to administer fatal doses of drugs to patients with limited prognosis. Euthanasia was less accepted with more years of training (p < 0.001). When making decisions regarding limitation of life-support therapy, students chose to involve patients (98%), doctors (92%) and families (73%) but few chose to involve nurses (38%).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical students’ attitudes towards end-of-life decisions changed during medical training and differed significantly from those of non-medical students.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. McCue JD. The naturalness of dying. JAMA. 1995;273:1039–43.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Callahan D. The Troubled Dream of Life: Living With Mortality. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Billings JA, Block S. Palliative care in undergraduate medical education. JAMA. 1997;278:733–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caralis AV, Hammond JS. Attitudes of medical students, housestaff, and faulty physicians towards euthanasia and termination of life-sustaining treatment. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:683–90.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Self DJ, Olivarez M, Baldwin DC. Clarifying the relationship of medical education and moral development. Acad Med. 1998;73:517–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Herbert PC, Meslin EM, Dunn EV. Measuring the ethical sensitivity of medical students: a study at the University of Toronto. J Med Ethics. 1992;18:142–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patenaude J, Niyonsenga T, Farfad D. Changes in students’ moral development during medical school: a cohort study. J Can Med Assoc. 2003;168:840–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wolf TM, Balson PM, Faucett JM, Randall HM. A retrospective study of attitude change during medical education. Med Educ. 1989;23:19–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Price J, Price D, Williams G, Hoffenberg R. Changes in medical students attitudes as they progress through a medical course. J Med Ethics. 1998;24:110–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Self DJ, Wolinsky FD, Baldwin DC. The effect of teaching medical ethics on medical students’ moral reasoning. Acad Med. 1989;64:755–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Self DJ, Schrader DE, Baldwin DC, Wolinsky FD. The moral development of medical students: A pilot study of the possible influence of medical education. Med Educ. 1993;27:26–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayes RP, Stoudemire AS, Kinlaw K, Dell ML, Loomis A. Changing attitudes about end-of-life decision making during third-year clinical clerkships. Psychosomatics. 1999;40:205–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldie J, Schwartz L, McConnachie A, Morrison J. The impact of a modern medical curriculum on students’ proposed behaviour on meeting ethical dilemmas. Med Educ. 2004;38:942–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldie J, Schwartz L, Morrison J. Students’ attitudes and potential behaviour to a competent patient’s request for withdrawal of treatment as they pass through a modern medical curriculum. J Med Ethics. 2004;30:371–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hipshman L. Attitudes towards informed consent, confidentiality, and substitute treatment decisions in southern African medical students: a case study from Zimbabwe. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:313–28.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldie J, Schwartz L, McConnachie A, Morrison J. The impact of three years’ ethics teaching, in an integrated medical curriculum, on students’ proposed behaviours on meeting ethical dilemmas. Med Educ. 2002;36:489–97.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sullivan AM, Lakoma MD, Block SD. The status of medical education in end-of-life care: A National Report. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:685–95.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Soleymani Lehmann L, Kasoff WS, Koch P, Federman DD. A survey of medical ethics education at U.S. and Canadian Medical Schools. Acad Med. 2004;79:682–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vincent JL. European attitudes towards ethical problems in intensive care medicine: results of an ethical questionnaire. Intensive Care Med. 1990;16:256–64.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Netherlands State Commission on Euthanasia. Final Report of the Netherlands State Commission on Euthanasia: An English Summary (anonymous translation). Bioethics. 1987; 1:163–174.

  21. Yap HY, Joynt GM, Gomersall CD. Ethical attitudes of intensive care physicians in Hong Kong: questionnaire survey. Hong Kong Med J. 2004;10:244–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vincent JL. Foregoing life support in western European Intensive care units: The results of an ethical questionnaire. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1626–34.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Asch DA, Hansen-Flaschen J, Lanken PN. Decisions to limit or continue life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: Conflicts between physicians’ practices and patients’ wishes. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 1995;151:288–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sprung CL, Eidelman LA. World wide similarities and differences in the foregoing of life-sustaining treatments. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:1003–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee DK, Swinburne AJ, Fedullo AJ, Wahl GW. Withdrawing care. Experience in a medical intensive care unit. JAMA. 1994;271:1358–61.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Prendergast TJ, Luce JM. Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155:15–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Turner JS, Mitchell WL, Morgan CJ, Benatar SR. Limitation of life support: frequency and practice in a London and Cape Town intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22:1020–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Keenan SP, Busche KD, Chen LM, McCarthy L, Inman KJ, Sibbald WJ. A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients undergoing the process of withholding and withdrawal of life support. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1324–31.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Watts J. Hong Kong debates where to draw the line with passive euthanasia. Lancet. 2000;355:633.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ip M, Gilligan T, Koenig B, et al. Ethical decision making in critical care In Hong Kong. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:447–51.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Buckley TA, Joynt GM, Tan PY, et al. Limitation of life support: frequency and practice in a Hong Kong intensive care unit. 2004;32:415–20.

  32. Chong AML, Fok SY. Attitudes towards euthanasia in Hong Kong-A comparison between physicians and the general public. Death Stud. 2004;29:29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Financial support received

None.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong, China

    Pascale C. Gruber MBBS, FRCA, Charles D. Gomersall MBBS, FJFICM, Gavin M. Joynt MBBCN, FJFICM, Anna Lee PhD, Pui Yin Grace Tang, Adelina Shuan Young, Nga Yui Florrie Yu & Oi Ting Yu

Authors
  1. Pascale C. Gruber MBBS, FRCA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Charles D. Gomersall MBBS, FJFICM
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gavin M. Joynt MBBCN, FJFICM
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anna Lee PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pui Yin Grace Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Adelina Shuan Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nga Yui Florrie Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Oi Ting Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascale C. Gruber MBBS, FRCA.

Appendix

Appendix

Questionnaire

Part A: Demographic features

  1. 1)

    Age:

  2. 2)

    Sex:

  3. 3)

    Religion:

  4. 4)

    Year:

  5. 5)

    Medical student ❑ Non-medical student ❑

Part B: Questionnaire

1) In your opinion do you think doctors should admit to ICU the following patients? Yes No
a) with no hope of survival for more than a few weeks ❑ ❑
b) who may live for several years but whose quality of life is very poor according to the doctors opinion ❑ ❑
c) who may live for several years but whose quality of life is very poor according to the patients opinion ❑ ❑
d) with limited chances of survival ❑ ❑
2) Medical information (diagnosis, treatment) given to the patient and family should: (Choose one)
a) Always include everything we know so far, without exception ❑
b) Depend on the type of disease and chance of survival ❑
c) Depend on the type of patient (e.g. personality, wishes, education level, etc.) ❑
d) Depend on both b and c ❑
3) Do you think doctors should tell the patient and family if an avoidable mistake occurs? (Choose one)
a) yes, exactly what happened, including problems that were probably due to human error ❑
b) yes, that problems occurred but limit the information given to avoid unnecessary distress and blame ❑
c) no, nothing should be mentioned ❑
4) If a sufficiently capable person refuses surgery that a doctor considers necessary and life-saving, do you think the doctor should? (Choose one)
a) try to convince the patient but if he/she still refuses, accept the patient’s decision ❑
b) treat the patient according to what the doctor thinks is right, contrary to the patient’s wish ❑
c) Inform the patient that he/she (the doctor) is no longer be able to look after them ❑
5) If a sufficiently capable person refuses surgery that a doctor considers necessary but not life-saving, do you think the doctor should? (Choose one)
a) try to convince the patient but if he/she still refuses, accept the patient’s decision ❑
b) treat the patient according to what the doctor thinks is right, contrary to the patient’s wish ❑
c) Inform the patient that he/she (the doctor) is no longer be able to look after them ❑
The last event in any terminal illness is when the heart stops beating. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) involves pushing on the chest to compress the heart and giving electrical shocks to the heart to try and restart the heart when the heart has stopped beating. The success rate of CPR to restart the heart is low and the patient, at best, may return to the same state of illness as before the event.
  Yes No
6) Must CPR always be provided to try and restart the heart? ❑ ❑
If your answer is yes, please go to Q 10.
7) Do you think doctors should discuss with patients (if they are conscious and mentally capable) before deciding whether to withhold CPR? ❑ ❑
8) Do you think doctors should discuss with families of patients before deciding whether to withhold CPR even if the patient is conscious and mentally capable? ❑ ❑
9) Do you think doctors should discuss with families of patients who are unconscious or mentally incapable before deciding whether to withhold CPR? ❑ ❑
10) For patients who have no real chance of recovering good quality of life, do you think it is acceptable for doctors to withhold (not increasing level of support) sophisticated life support treatments (e.g., breathing machines)? ❑ ❑
11) For patients who have no real chance of recovering good quality of life, do you think it is acceptable for doctors to discontinue (reducing level of support) sophisticated life support treatments (e.g., breathing machines)? ❑ ❑
If your answers to 10 and 11 are yes, please answer Q 12. Otherwise, please go to Q 13.
12) Would you feel more comfortable with 10 rather than 11? ❑ ❑
13) For patients who have no real chance of recovering good quality of life, do you think it is acceptable for doctors to deliberately administer large doses of drugs (e.g., morphine) to ensure that death occurs
a) after discussing with the patient/the patient’s family and obtaining their consent? ❑ ❑
b) without obtaining the consent of the patient/the patient’s family? ❑ ❑
14) For patients who have no real chance of recovering good quality of life, do you think doctors should continue life support treatments regardless of the consequence? ❑ ❑
15) For patients who have no real chance of recovering good quality of life, if the family insists on maximal medical treatment, do you think doctors should (Choose one):
a) continue maximal medical treatment including CPR if the heart stops ❑
b) continue maximal medical treatment excluding CPR if the heart stops ❑
c) continue present care but withhold sophisticated treatment (e.g., operations) ❑
d) continue present care but withhold additional treatment (e.g., antibiotics) ❑
e) discontinue the breathing machine to allow the patient to die ❑
f) discontinue all treatments (e.g., feeding) except the breathing machine ❑
g) continue maximal therapy pending a judge’s decision ❑
16) In a conscious and sufficiently capable person should the decision regarding limitation (withhold/withdrawal) of medical treatment involve: Yes No
a) the patient ❑ ❑
b) the family ❑ ❑
c) doctors ❑ ❑
d) nurses ❑ ❑
17) In an unconscious or mentally incapable person should the decision regarding limitation (withhold/withdrawal) of medical treatment involve:
a) family ❑ ❑
b) doctors ❑ ❑
c) nurses ❑ ❑
18) If you take a group of people whose hearts have stopped where doctors have managed successfully to restart the heart. What do you think their chances of leaving hospital alive are?   %
19) What % of deaths do you think are preceded by some limitation (withhold/withdrawal) of medical treatment in ICU?   %

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gruber, P.C., Gomersall, C.D., Joynt, G.M. et al. Changes in Medical Students’ Attitudes Towards End-of-Life Decisions Across Different Years of Medical Training. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 1608–1614 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0713-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0713-y

KEY WORDS

  • medical students
  • medical education
  • ethics
  • euthanasia
  • life-support therapy