Can Primary Care Visits Reduce Hospital Utilization Among Medicare Beneficiaries at the End of Life?
- 304 Downloads
Medical care at the end of life is often expensive and ineffective.
To explore associations between primary care and hospital utilization at the end of life.
Retrospective analysis of Medicare data. We measured hospital utilization during the final 6 months of life and the number of primary care physician visits in the 12 preceding months. Multivariate cluster analysis adjusted for the effects of demographics, comorbidities, and geography in end-of-life healthcare utilization.
National random sample of 78,356 Medicare beneficiaries aged 66+ who died in 2001. Non-whites were over-sampled. All subjects with complete Medicare data for 18 months prior to death were retained, except for those in the End Stage Renal Disease program.
Hospital days, costs, in-hospital death, and presence of two types of preventable hospital admissions (Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions) during the final 6 months of life.
Sample characteristics: 38% had 0 primary care visits; 22%, 1–2; 19%, 3–5; 10%, 6–8; and 11%, 9+ visits. More primary care visits in the preceding year were associated with fewer hospital days at end of life (15.3 days for those with no primary care visits vs. 13.4 for those with ≥9 visits, P < 0.001), lower costs ($24,400 vs. $23,400, P < 0.05), less in-hospital death (44% vs. 40%, P < 0.01), and fewer preventable hospitalizations for those with congestive heart failure (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 0.82, P < 0.001) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aOR = 0.81, P = 0.02).
Primary care visits in the preceding year are associated with less, and less costly, end-of-life hospital utilization. Increased primary care access for Medicare beneficiaries may decrease costs and improve quality at the end of life.
Key wordsend-of-life care health services research primary care
- 2.Edwards C, DeHaven T. War betweeen the generations: federal spending on the elderly set to explode. In: C. Institute, eds. Policy Analysis. Washington D.C.; 2003: 1–22.Google Scholar
- 3.Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press; 1997.Google Scholar
- 19.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Refinement of the HCUP Quality Indicators. 2001 Summary, Technical Review Number 4. Available at: http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/downloads/technical/qi_technical_summary.pdf. Accessed March 12, 2008.
- 26.Baicker K, Chandra A, Skinner JS, Wennberg JE. Who you are and where you live: how race and geography affect the treatment of medicare beneficiaries. Health Aff. 2004;(Suppl Web Exclusive):VAR33–44.Google Scholar
- 34.Fisher ES, Wennberg JE, Stukel TA, et al. Associations among hospital capacity, utilization, and mortality of US Medicare beneficiaries, controlling for sociodemographic factors. Health Serv Res. 34(6):1351–62.Google Scholar
- 36.Kronman A, Hanchate A, Ash AS. Improving risk adjustment for illness burden. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(s1). Abstract.Google Scholar
- 37.Health Care Financing Review: Medicare and Medicaid Statistical Supplement. US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Research, Development and Information, 2003.Google Scholar
- 38.Statement for the Record for Senate HELP Committee Hearing on Addressing Healthcare Workforce Issues for the Future (12-Feb-08): A Report from the American College of Physicians; 2008. Available at: http://www.acponline.org/advocacy/where_we_stand/workforce/pc_workforce.pdf Accessed March 12, 2008.