Skip to main content

Part-Time Physicians…Prevalent, Connected, and Satisfied

Journal of General Internal Medicine volume 23, pages 300–303 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

The health care workforce is evolving and part-time practice is increasing. The objective of this work is to determine the relationship between part-time status, workplace conditions, and physician outcomes.

Design

Minimizing error, maximizing outcome (MEMO) study surveyed generalist physicians and their patients in the upper Midwest and New York City.

Measurements and Main Results

Physician survey of stress, burnout, job satisfaction, work control, intent to leave, and organizational climate. Patient survey of satisfaction and trust. Responses compared by part-time and full-time physician status; 2-part regression analyses assessed outcomes associated with part-time status. Of 751 physicians contacted, 422 (56%) participated. Eighteen percent reported part-time status (n = 77, 31% of women, 8% of men, p < .001). Part-time physicians reported less burnout (p < .01), higher satisfaction (p < .001), and greater work control (p < .001) than full-time physicians. Intent to leave and assessments of organizational climate were similar between physician groups. A survey of 1,795 patients revealed no significant differences in satisfaction and trust between part-time and full-time physicians.

Conclusions

Part-time is a successful practice style for physicians and their patients. If favorable outcomes influence career choice, an increased demand for part-time practice is likely to occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Spickard A Jr., Gabbe SG, Christensen JF. Mid-career burnout in generalist and specialist physicians. JAMA. 2002;288:1447–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Survey: 60% of primary care physicians would choose another field. Med News Today. Available at: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/81499.php. Accessed January 8, 2008.

  3. American Medical Association, Women Physicians Congress. 2001 status report. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/upload/mm/hod_ibot15_doc.doc. Accessed July 12, 2007.

  4. Clarkberg M, Moen P. Understanding the time-squeeze: married couples preferred and actual work-hour strategies. Am Behav Sci. 2001;44:1115–36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dorsey E, Jarjoura D, Rutecki GW. Influence of controllable lifestyle on recent trends in specialty choice by US medical students. JAMA. 2003;290:1173–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. American Association of Medical Colleges. Third annual AAMC physician workforce research conference, May 3–4, 2007, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/workforce/pwrc/start.htm. Accessed November 7, 2007.

  7. McMurray JE, Cohen M, Angus G, et al. Women in medicine: a four-nation comparison. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 2002;57:185–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fairchild DG, McLoughlin KS, Gharib S, et al. Productivity, quality, and patient satisfaction: comparison of part-time and full-time primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:663–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Linzer M, Baier Manwell L, Mundt M, et al. Organizational climate, stress, and error in primary care: the MEMO Study. In: Advances in patient safety: from research to implementation. AHRQ Publication No. 050021 (1). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2005, vol.1: 65–77. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/advances/. Accessed November 7, 2007.

  10. Williams ES, Konrad TR, Linzer M, et al. Refining the measurement of physician job satisfaction: results from the Physician Worklife Study. Med Care. 1999;37:1140–54.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Konrad TR, Williams ES, Linzer M, et al. Measuring physician job satisfaction in a changing workplace and a challenging environment. Med Care. 1999;37:1174–82.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Motowidlo SJ, Packard JS, Manning MR. Occupational stress: its causes and consequences for job performance. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71:618–29.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rohland BM, Kruse G, Rohrer JE. Valiation of a single-item measure of burnout against the Maslach Burnout Inventory among physicians. Stress Health. 2004;20:75–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, et al. Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the Physician Worklife Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:441–50.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kralewski JE, Wingert TD, Barbouche MH. Assessing the culture of medical group practices. Med Care. 1996;34:377–88.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Haas JS, Cook EF, Puopolo AL, Burstin HR, Cleary PD, Brennan TA. Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(2):122–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kao AC, Green DC, Davis NA, Koplan JP, Cleary PD. Patients’ trust in their physicians: effects of choice, continuity, and payment method. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:681–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams ES, Skinner AC. Outcomes of physician job satisfaction: a narrative review, implications, and directions for future research. Health Care Manage Rev. 2003;28:941–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Linzer M, Visser MR, Oort FJ, Smets EM, McMurray JE, de Haes HC. Predicting and preventing physician burnout: results from the United States and The Netherlands. Am J Med. 2001;111:170–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Parkerton PH, Wagner EH, Smith DG, Straley HL. Effect of part-time practice on patient outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:717–24.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–36.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Portions of this paper were presented at Out of Chaos: The Critical Role of Generalists, 28th Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, May 11–14, 2005. Funding for this study was provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, grant number 5 R01 HS011955.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA

    Hilit F. Mechaber MD

  2. Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Rachel B. Levine MD, MPH

  3. University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA

    Linda Baier Manwell MS, Marlon P. Mundt PhD & Mark Linzer MD

Authors
  1. Hilit F. Mechaber MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rachel B. Levine MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda Baier Manwell MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marlon P. Mundt PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mark Linzer MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

for the MEMO Investigators

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilit F. Mechaber MD.

Additional information

Other members of the MEMO investigative team include Mark Schwartz, Deborah Dowell, Perry An, and Karla Felix, New York University, NYC, NY; Julia McMurray, James Bobula, Mary Beth Plane, William Scheckler, John Frey, Jessica Sherrieb, and Jessica Grettie, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Barbara Horner-Ibler, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Ann Maguire, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Laura Paluch, Aurora Sinai Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI; Bernice Man and Anita Varkey, Rush Medical College, Chicago IL; Elizabeth Arce, Cook County Hospital, Chicago, IL; Joseph Rabatin, Brown University, Providence, RI; Elianne Riska, University of Helsinki, Finland; JudyAnn Bigby, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA; Thomas R. Konrad and Peggy Leatt, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Stewart Babbott, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City; and Eric Williams, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mechaber, H.F., Levine, R.B., Manwell, L.B. et al. Part-Time Physicians…Prevalent, Connected, and Satisfied. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 300–303 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0514-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0514-3

KEY WORDS

  • physicians
  • workplace
  • part-time
  • work hours