Abstract
Background
Patient education materials can assist patient decision making on prostate cancer screening.
Objective
To explore the effectiveness of presenting health information on prostate cancer screening using video, internet, and written interventions on patient decision making, attitudes, knowledge, and screening interest.
Design
Randomized controlled trial.
Participants
A total of 161 men aged over 45, who had never been screened for prostate cancer, were randomized to receive information on prostate cancer screening.
Measurements
Participants were assessed at baseline and 1-week postintervention for decisional conflict, screening interest, knowledge, anxiety, and decision-making preference.
Results
A total of 156 men were followed-up at 1-week postintervention. There was no statistical, or clinical, difference in mean change in decisional conflict scores between the 3 intervention groups (video vs internet −0.06 [95% CI −0.24 to 0.12]; video vs pamphlet 0.04 [95%CI −0.15 to 0.22]; internet vs pamphlet 0.10 [95%CI −0.09 to 0.28]). There was also no statistically significant difference in mean knowledge, anxiety, decision-making preference, and screening interest between the 3 intervention groups.
Conclusion
Results from this study indicate that there are no clinically significant differences in decisional conflict when men are presented health information on prostate cancer screening via video, written materials, or the internet. Given the equivalence of the 3 methods, other factors need to be considered in deciding which method to use. Health professionals should provide patient health education materials via a method that is most convenient to the patient and their preferred learning style.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Parkin D, Bray F, Devesa S. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:S4–S66.
Frankel S, Smith G, Donovan J, Neal D. Screening for prostate cancer. Lancet. 2003;361:1122–8.
Ilic D, O’Connor D, Green S, Wilt T. Screening for prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Issue 3, 2006.
Eysenbach G, Jadad A. Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the internet age. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3:e19.
O’Connor A, Rostom A, Fiset V, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. Br Med J. 1999;319:731–4.
O’Connor A. Decisional conflict scale. 4th Edition, 1999. Available at; http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_DecConflict2006.pdf. Accessed July 4, 2007.
Ilic D, Risbridger G, Green S. The informed man: attitudes and information needs on prostate cancer screening. Journal of Men’s Health and Gender. 2005;2:414–20.
Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L. How the internet affects patients’ experience of cancer: a qualitative study. Br Med J. 2004;328:564–70.
Flood A, Wennberg J, Nease R, Fowler F, Ding J, Hynes L. The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:342–9.
Frosch D, Kaplan R, Felitti V. Evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:391–8.
Frosch D, Kaplan R, Felitti V. A randomised controlled trial comparing internet and video to facilitate patient education for men considering the prostate specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:781–7.
Gattellari M, Ward J. Does evidence-based information about screening for prostate cancer enhance consumer decision-making? A randomized controlled trial. J Med Screen. 2003;10:27–39.
Gattellari M, Ward J. A community-based randomized controlled trial of three different educational resources for men about prostate cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:168–82.
Partin M, Nelson D, Radosevich D, et al. Randomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences and behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:835–42.
Ruthman J, Ferrans C. Efficacy of a video for teaching patients about prostate cancer screening and treatment. Am J Health Promot. 2004;18:292–5.
Volk R, Cass A, Spann S. A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:333–40.
Schapira M, Van Ruswyk J. The effect of an illustrated pamphlet decision—aid on the use of prostate cancer screening tests. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:418–24.
Davison J, Kirk P, Degner L, Hassard T. Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;37:255–63.
Wilt T, Paul J, Murdoch M, Nelson D, Nugent S, Rubins H. Educating men about prostate cancer screening. A randomized trial of a mailed pamphlet. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4:278–86.
Schapira M, Meade C, Nattinger A. Enhanced decision-making: the use of a videotape decision—aid for patients with prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;30:119–27.
Tate D, Wing R, Winett R. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001;285:1172–7.
Christensen H, Griffiths K, Jorm A. Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2004;328:265–70.
Scherrer-Bannerman A, Fofonoff D, Minshall D, et al. Web-based education and support for patients on the cardiac surgery waiting list. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6:s72–74.
O’Connor A. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak. 1995;15:25–30.
Marteau T, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventor. Br J Clin Psychol. 1992;31:301–6.
Degner L, Sloan J. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:941–50.
Murray E, Davis H, Tai S, Coulter A, Gray A, Haines A. Randomized controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care. Br Med J. 2001;323:1–6.
Wei L, Zhang J. Analysis of data with imbalance in the baseline outcome variable for randomized clinical trials. Drug Inf J. 2001;35:1201–14.
Scott S, Goldberg M, Mayo N. Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:45–55.
Murray E, Burns J, See Tai S, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive health communication applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Issue 4, 2005.
Acknowledgments
A portion of the results from this manuscript was presented at the 2nd Asia-Pacific Forum on Andrology, October 27, 2006, Shanghai, China. This work was funded by internal funding from the Monash Institute of Health Services Research.
Conflict of Interest
None disclosed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ilic, D., Egberts, K., McKenzie, J.E. et al. Informing Men about Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient Education Materials. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 466–471 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0466-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0466-z