Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Acute Myocardial Infarction Length of Stay and Hospital Mortality Are Not Associated with Language Preference

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Language barriers between patients and providers may influence the process and quality of care.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association of language preference with length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality for patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Electronic administrative hospital discharge data for all non-disabled Medicaid beneficiaries age 35 years and older admitted to all acute care California hospitals with a diagnosis of AMI between 1994 and 1998.

METHODS

We used multivariate regression to explore whether observed differences in the hospital LOS and in-hospital mortality between non-English preference (NEP) and English preference (EP) individuals could be explained by individual and/or hospital level factors. We adjusted for patient level characteristics using 24 covariates from a previously validated prediction model of mortality after hospitalization for AMI.

RESULTS

Of 12,609 Medicaid patients across 401 California hospitals, 2,757 (22%) had NEP. NEP was associated with a 3.9% increased LOS (95% CI 0.7, 7.1; p = 0.02) in unadjusted analysis and a 3.8% increased LOS (95% CI 0.3, 7.3; p = 0.03) after controlling for patient level characteristics. Differences in LOS were no longer significant after adjusting receipt of cardiac procedure/ surgery (2.8%; 95% CI −0.6, 6.2; p = 0.1) or after adjusting for hospital (0.9%; 95% CI −2.5, 4.3; p = 0.6). Non-English language preference was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in unadjusted analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.80; 95% CI 0.69, 0.94; p = 0.005), but was not significant after adjusting for patient level characteristics (adjusted OR [AOR] 0.95; 95% CI 0.78, 1.27; p = 0.6). Adjusting for receipt of cardiac procedure/ surgery (AOR 0.97; 95% CI 0.79, 1.18; p = 0.7) and hospital (AOR 0.97; 95% CI 0.78; 1.21; p = 0.8) did not alter this finding.

CONCLUSIONS

Language preference is not associated with AMI mortality, and the small increase in length of stay associated with non-English preference is accounted for by hospital level factors. Our results suggest that system level differences are important to consider in studies of the effect of language barriers in the health care setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Census Bureau. QT-02. Profile of Selected Social Characteristics, 2000.

  2. Brach C, Fraser I. Reducing disparities through culturally competent health care: an analysis of the business case. Qual Manag Health Care. 2002;10(4):15–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Derose KP, Baker DW. Limited English proficiency and Latinos’ use of physician services. Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57(1):76–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Solis JM, et al. Acculturation, access to care, and use of preventive services by Hispanics: findings from HHANES 1982–84. Am J Public Health. 1990;80(Suppl):11–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stein JA, Fox SA. Language preference as an indicator of mammography use among Hispanic women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990;82(21):1715–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner TH, Guendelman S. Healthcare utilization among Hispanics: findings from the 1994 Minority Health Survey. Am J Manag Care. 2000;6(3):355–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Woloshin S, et al. Is language a barrier to the use of preventive services? J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(8):472–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fiscella K, Franks P, Doescher MP, Saver BG. Disparities in health care by race, ethnicity, and language among the insured. Med Care. 2002;40:52–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghandi TK, Burstin HR, Cook EF, et al. Drug complications in outpatients. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:149–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Crane JA. Patient comprehension of doctor-patient communication on discharge from the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 1997;15:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carrasquillo O, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Burstin HR. Impact of language barriers on patient satisfaction in an emergency department. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:82–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Drennan G. Counting the costs of language services in psychiatry. S Afr Med J. 1996;86:344–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vasquez C, Javier R. The problem with interpreters: communicating with Spanish-speaking patients. Hospital & Community Psychiatry. 1991;42:163–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chan A, Woodruff RK. Comparison of palliative care needs of English- and non-English-speaking patients. J Palliat Care. 1999;15:26–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Devore JS, Koskela K. The language barrier in obstetric anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;137:745–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. John-Baptiste A, Nagile G, Tomlinson G, et al. The effect of English language proficiency on length of stay and in-hospital mortality. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:221–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. Errors and Acceptance of California Patient Discharge Data Reporting Manual, 3rd Edition. Sacramento, CA: Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, 2000.

  18. Health Care and Analysis Division. Report on Heart Attack Outcomes in California 1996-1998, Volume 2: Technical Guide, Sacramento, California: California Office of Statewide Planning and Development, February 2002.

  19. Bach PB, Pham HH, Schrag D, et al. Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:575–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was funded in part by a Physician Faculty Development in Primary Care Grant (#D55 HP 05165-01-00) from the Department of Health and Human Services. Dr. Bibbins-Domingo’s efforts were supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Amos Faculty Development Award) and an NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Diversity Supplement. Dr. Fernandez’ efforts were supported by an NIH Career Development Award (K23 832401).

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanessa Grubbs MD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grubbs, V., Bibbins-Domingo, K., Fernandez, A. et al. Acute Myocardial Infarction Length of Stay and Hospital Mortality Are Not Associated with Language Preference. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 190–194 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0459-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0459-y

KEY WORDS

Navigation