Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A Randomized Trial of Telemedicine-based Collaborative Care for Depression

Abstract

Background

Evidence-based practices designed for large urban clinics are not necessarily portable into smaller isolated clinics. Implementing practice-based collaborative care for depression in smaller primary care clinics presents unique challenges because it is often not feasible to employ on-site psychiatrists.

Objective

The purpose of the Telemedicine Enhanced Antidepressant Management (TEAM) study was to evaluate a telemedicine-based collaborative care model adapted for small clinics without on-site psychiatrists.

Design

Matched sites were randomized to the intervention or usual care.

Participants

Small VA Community-based outpatient clinics with no on-site psychiatrists, but access to telepsychiatrists. In 2003–2004, 395 primary care patients with PHQ9 depression severity scores ≥12 were enrolled, and followed for 12 months. Patients with serious mental illness and current substance dependence were excluded.

Measures

Medication adherence, treatment response, remission, health status, health-related quality of life, and treatment satisfaction.

Results

The sample comprised mostly elderly, white, males with substantial physical and behavioral health comorbidity. At baseline, subjects had moderate depression severity (Hopkins Symptom Checklist, SCL-20 = 1.8), 3.7 prior depression episodes, and 67% had received prior depression treatment. Multivariate analyses indicated that intervention patients were more likely to be adherent at both 6 (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1, p = .04) and 12 months (OR = 2.7, p = .01). Intervention patients were more likely to respond by 6 months (OR = 2.0, p = .02), and remit by 12 months (OR = 2.4, p = .02). Intervention patients reported larger gains in mental health status and health-related quality of life, and reported higher satisfaction.

Conclusions

Collaborative care can be successfully adapted for primary care clinics without on-site psychiatrists using telemedicine technologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Figure 1

References

  1. 1.

    Katon W, Von Korff M, Lin E, et al. Stepped collaborative care for primary care patients with persistent symptoms of depression: a randomized trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56(12):1109–15.

  2. 2.

    Katon W, Robinson P, Von Korff M, et al. A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of depression in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53(10):924–32.

  3. 3.

    Simon GE, VonKorff M, Rutter C, Wagner E. Randomised trial of monitoring, feedback, and management of care by telephone to improve treatment of depression in primary care. Br Med J. 2000;320(7234):550–4.

  4. 4.

    Rost K, Nutting P, Smith J, Werner J, Duan N. Improving depression outcomes in community primary care practice: a randomized trial of the QuEST intervention. Quality enhancement by strategic teaming. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(3):143–9.

  5. 5.

    Wells KB, Sherbourne C, Schoenbaum M, et al. Impact of disseminating quality improvement programs for depression in managed primary care: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283(2):212–20.

  6. 6.

    Finley PR, Rens HR, Pont JM, et al. Impact of collaborative care model upon depression in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Pharmacotherapy. 2003;23:1175–85.

  7. 7.

    Adler DA, Bungay KM, Wilson IB, et al. The impact of a pharmacist intervention on 6-month outcomes in depressed primary care patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2004;26(3):199–209.

  8. 8.

    Unutzer J, Katon W, Callahan CM, et al. Improving mood-promoting access to collaborative treatment: collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288(22):2836–45.

  9. 9.

    Hedrick SC, Chaney EF, Felker B, et al. Effectiveness of collaborative care depression treatment in Veteran’s Affairs primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(1):9–16.

  10. 10.

    Alexopoulos GS, Katz IR, Bruce ML, et al. Remission in depressed geriatric primary care patients: a report from the PROSPECT Study. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162(4):718–24.

  11. 11.

    Bruce ML, Ten Have TR, Reynolds CF, III, et al. Reducing suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms in depressed older primary care patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;291(9):1081–91.

  12. 12.

    Dobscha SK, Corson K, Hickam DH, Perrin NA, Kraemer DF, Gerrity MS. Depression decision support in primary care: a cluster randomized trial. Ann Intern Med (in press).

  13. 13.

    Pyne JM, Rost KM, Farahati F, et al. One size fits some: the impact of patient treatment attitudes on the cost-effectiveness of a depression primary-care intervention. Psychol Med. 2005;35:839–54.

  14. 14.

    Pyne JM, Smith J, Fortney J, Zhang M, Williams DK, Rost K. Cost-effectiveness of a primary care intervention for depressed females. J Affect Disord. 2003;74(1):23–32.

  15. 15.

    Von Korff M, Katon W, Bush T, et al. Treatment costs, cost offset and cost-effectiveness of collaborative management of depression. Psychosom Med. 1998;60:143–9.

  16. 16.

    Schoenbaum M, Unutzer J, Sherbourne C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of practice-initiated quality improvement for depression: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2001;286(11):1325–30.

  17. 17.

    Simon GE, Manning WG, Katzelnick DJ, Pearson SD, Henk HJ, Helstad CP. Cost-effectiveness of systematic depression treatment for high utilizers of general medical care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58(2):181–7.

  18. 18.

    Simon GE, Von Korff M, Ludman EJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a program to prevent depression relapse in primary care. Med Care. 2002;40(10):941–50.

  19. 19.

    Liu CF, Hedrick SC, Chaney EF, et al. Cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in a primary care veteran population. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54(5):698–704.

  20. 20.

    Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Improving outcomes in chronic illness. Manag Care Q. 1996;4(2):12–25.

  21. 21.

    Wagner EH. Managed care and chronic illness: health services research needs. Health Serv Res. 1997;32(5):702–14.

  22. 22.

    Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996;74(4):511–44.

  23. 23.

    Rost K, Fortney J, Fischer E, Smith J. Use, quality and outcomes of care for mental health: the rural perspective. Med Care Res Rev. 2002;59(3):231–65.

  24. 24.

    Williams JW, Jr., Rost K, Dietrich AJ, Ciotti MC, Zyzanski SJ, Cornell J. Primary care physicians’ approach to depressive disorders. Effects of physician specialty and practice structure. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:58–67.

  25. 25.

    Institute of Medicine. Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications in Health Care. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 1996.

  26. 26.

    Asch SM, McGlynn EA, Hogan MM, et al. Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(12):938–45.

  27. 27.

    Fortney JC, Pyne JM, Edlund MJ, Robinson DE, Mittal D, Henderson KL. Design and implementation of the Telemedicine-Enhanced Antidepressant Management Study. Gen Hosp Psych. 2006;28(1):18–26.

  28. 28.

    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatr Ann. 2002;32(9):509–15.

  29. 29.

    Smith GR, Jr., Burnam A, Burns BJ, Cleary P, Rost KM. Depression outcomes module (DOM). In: American Psychiatric Association, ed. Handbook of Psychiatric Measures. Washington, DC; 2000:213–5.

  30. 30.

    Kramer TL, Smith GR, D’Arezzo KW, Card-Higginson P. Depression outcomes module. The guide to behavioral health outcomes management systems. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock AR; 2000:71–83.

  31. 31.

    Lecrubier Y, Sheehan DV, Weiller E, et al. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatr. 1997;12(5):224–31.

  32. 32.

    Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Sheehan KH, et al. The validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) according to the SCID-P and its reliability. Eur Psychiatr. 1997;12(5):232–41.

  33. 33.

    Parkerson GR, Jr., Michener JL, Wu LR, et al. Associations among family support, family stress, and personal functional health status. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(3):217–29.

  34. 34.

    Parkerson GR, Jr., Broadhead WE, Tse CJ. Quality of life and functional health of primary care patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(11):1303–13.

  35. 35.

    Edlund M, Reaves-Powell CM, Fortney JC, Pyne JM, Mittal D. Beliefs about depression and depression treatment among depressed veterans. Working paper; 2006.

  36. 36.

    Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(5):487–97.

  37. 37.

    Revicki DA, Brown RE, Palmer W, et al. Modelling the cost effectiveness of antidepressant treatment in primary care. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995;8(6):524–40.

  38. 38.

    Thompson C, Peveler RC, Stephenson D, McKendrick J. Compliance with antidepressant medication in the treatment of major depressive disorder in primary care: a randomized comparison of fluoxetine and a tricyclic antidepressant. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(3):338–43.

  39. 39.

    Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K, Uhlenhuth EH, Covi L. The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL): a measure of primary symptom dimensions. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1974;7:79–110.

  40. 40.

    Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K, Uhlenhuth EH, Covi L. The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behav Sci. 1974;19:1–15.

  41. 41.

    Jones D, Kazis L, Lee A, et al. Health status assessments using the Veterans SF-12 and SF-36: methods for evaluating outcomes in the Veterans Health Administration. J Ambul Care Manage. 2001;24(3):68–86.

  42. 42.

    Kazis LE, Miller DR, Clark J, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients served by the Department of Veterans Affairs: results from the Veterans Health Study. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(6):626–32.

  43. 43.

    Kaplan RM, Anderson JP. The general health policy model: an integrated approach. In: Spiker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996:309–21.

  44. 44.

    Kaplan RM, Bush JW. Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis. Health Psychol. 1982;1(1):61–80.

  45. 45.

    Pyne JM, Patterson TL, Kaplan RM, Gillin JC, Koch WL, Grant I. Assessment of the quality of life of patients with major depression. Psychiatr Serv. 1997;48(2):224–30.

  46. 46.

    Pyne JM, Patterson TL, Kaplan RM, et al. Preliminary longitudinal assessment of quality of life in patients with major depression. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;33(1):23–9.

  47. 47.

    Beebe TJ, Harrison PA, McRae JA, Jr., Asche SE. Evaluating behavioral health services in Minnesota’s Medicaid population using the Experience of Care and Health Outcomes (ECHO) Survey. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2003;14(4):608–21.

  48. 48.

    Kazis LE, Miller DR, Skinner KM, et al. Patient-reported measures of health: the Veterans Health Study. J Ambul Care Manage. 2005;27(1):70–83.

  49. 49.

    Badamgarav E, Weingarten SR, Henning JM, et al. Effectiveness of disease management programs in depression: a systematic review. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(12):2080–90.

  50. 50.

    Rush AJ, Trivedi M, Carmody TJ, Biggs MM, Shores-Wilson K. One-year clinical outcomes of depressed public sector outpatients: a benchmark for subsequent studies. Biol Psychiatry. 2004;56(1):46–53.

  51. 51.

    Simon GE, Ludman EJ, Tutty S, Operskalski B, Von Korff M. Telephone psychotherapy and telephone care management for primary care patients starting antidepressant treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;292(8):935–42.

  52. 52.

    Mohr DC, Hart SL, Julian L, et al. Telephone-administered psychotherapy for depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:1007–14.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by VA IIR 00-078-3 grant to Dr. Fortney, VA NPI-01-006-1 grant to Dr. Pyne, the VA HSR&D Center for Mental Health and Outcomes Research, and the VA South Central Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center. Drs. Pyne and Edlund were supported by VA HSR&D Research Career Awards. Dr. Mittal was supported by the VISN 16 South Central Network Research/Career Development Grant Program and VA South Central Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center. We would like to gratefully acknowledge all of the research staff who worked on the project, the veterans who participated, and the staff of the VA Community-Based Outpatient Clinics in Meridian, MS; Hattiesburg, MS; Mountain Home, AR; Hot Springs, AR; El Dorado, AR; Monroe, LA; and Longview, TX. In addition, we would like to recognize Dr. Raymond Kimble who took over as site-PI at the G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VAMC after Dr. Mittal left.

Conflicts of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Correspondence to John C. Fortney PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fortney, J.C., Pyne, J.M., Edlund, M.J. et al. A Randomized Trial of Telemedicine-based Collaborative Care for Depression. J GEN INTERN MED 22, 1086–1093 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0201-9

Download citation

KEY WORDS

  • depression
  • telepsychiatry
  • rural