Skip to main content

An Exploratory Study of Primary Care Physician Decision Making Regarding Total Joint Arthroplasty

Background

For patients to experience the benefits of total joint arthroplasty (TJA), primary care physicians (PCPs) ought to know when to refer a patient for TJA and/or optimize nonsurgical treatment options for osteoarthritis (OA).

Objective

To evaluate the ability of physicians to make clinical treatment decisions.

Design and participants

A survey, using ten clinical vignettes, of PCPs in Indiana.

Measurements

A test score (range 0 to 10) was computed based on the number of correct answers consistent with published explicit appropriateness criteria for TJA. We also collected demographic characteristics and physicians’ perceived success rate of TJA in terms of pain relief and functional improvement.

Results

There were 149 PCPs (response rate = 61%) who participated. The mean test score was 6.5 ± 1.5. Only 17% correctly identified the published success rate of TJA (i.e., ≥90%). In multivariate analysis, the only physician-related variables associated with test score were ethnicity, board status, and perceived success rate of TJA. Physicians who were white (P = .001), board-certified (P = .04), and perceived a higher success rate of TJA (P = .004) had higher test scores.

Conclusions

PCP knowledge with respect to guideline-concordant care for OA could be improved, specifically in deciding when to consider TJA versus optimizing nonsurgical options. Moreover, the perception of the success rate of TJA may influence a clinician’s decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Felson DT. Epidemiology of Osteoarthritis. In: Brandt KD, Doherty M, Lohmander L, eds. Osteoarthritis. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003:9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Felson DT, Zhang Y. An update on the epidemiology of knee and hip osteoarthritis with a view to prevention. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41(8):1343–55.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee. Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: 2000 update. American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis Guidelines. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43(9):1905–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris WH, Sledge CB. Total hip and total knee replacement (1). N Engl J Med. 1990; 323(11):725–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. NIH. NIH Consensus Development Conference on Total Knee Replacement 2003, 8–10 Dec 2006.

  6. NIH. Total Hip Replacement. NIH Consensus Statement 1994, 12–14 Sep 2006;(5):1–31.

  7. Katz JN. Preferences, quality, and the (under)utilization of total joint arthroplasty. Med Care. 2001;39(3):203–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yong PF, Milner PC, Payne JN, Lewis PA, Jennison C. Inequalities in access to knee joint replacements for people in need. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004; 63(11):1483–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunlop DD, Song J, Manheim LM, Chang RW. Racial disparities in joint replacement use among older adults. Med Care. 2003;41(2):288–98.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dixon T, Shaw M, Ebrahim S, Dieppe P. Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63(7):825–30.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Peterson MG, Hollenberg JP, Szatrowski TP, Johanson NA, Mancuso CA, Charlson ME. Geographic variations in the rates of elective total hip and knee arthroplasties among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(10):1530–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Charlson ME, Allegrante JP. Disparities in the use of total joint arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(14):1044–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Eaton HE, Katz JN. Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery. Am J Med. 1997;102(6):524–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang HJ, Mehta PS, Rosenberg A, Scrimshaw SC. Concerns of patients actively contemplating total knee replacement: differences by race and gender. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(1):117–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Suarez-Almazor ME, Souchek J, Kelly PA, et al. Ethnic variation in knee replacement: patient preferences or uninformed disparity? Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(10):1117–24.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hawker GA. The quest for explanations for race/ethnic disparity in rates of use of total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol 2004; 31(9):1683–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Coyte PC, Hawker G, Croxford R, Attard C, Wright JG. Variation in rheumatologists’ and family physicians’ perceptions of the indications for and outcomes of knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 1996;23(4):730–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mamlin LA, Melfi CA, Parchman ML, et al. Management of osteoarthritis of the knee by primary care physicians. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7(6):563–7.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rankin EA, Polk VM. Attitudes of referring physicians regarding total joint replacement: a preliminary report. J Natl Med Assoc. 1996;88(8):506–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Quintana JM, Arostegui I, Azkarate J, et al. Evaluation of explicit criteria for total hip joint replacement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000; 53(12):1200–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Quintana JM, Escobar A, Arostegui I, et al. Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of knee or hip joint replacement. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(2):220–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ACP Observer. Not all sports injuries need specialist care. Available at http://www.acponline.org/journals/news/july05/sports.htm.

  23. Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Katz BP, et al. Comparison of general internists, family physicians, and rheumatologists managing patients with symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Care Res. 1997;10(5):289–99.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brennan TA, Horwitz RI, Duffy FD, Cassel CK, Goode LD, Lipner RS. The role of physician specialty board certification status in the quality movement. JAMA. 2004;292(9):1038–43.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP, Wenrich MD. Predictive validity of certification by the American Board of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110(9):719–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nelsen DA, Jr., Hartley DA, Christianson J, Moscovice I, Chen MM. The use of new technologies by rural family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1994;38(5):479–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Haas JS, Orav EJ, Goldman L. The relationship between physicians’ qualifications and experience and the adequacy of prenatal care and low birthweight. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(8 Pt 1):1087–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pearce WH, Parker MA, Feinglass J, Ujiki M, Manheim LM. The importance of surgeon volume and training in outcomes for vascular surgical procedures. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29(5):768–76.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bach PB, Pham HH, Schrag D, Tate RC, Hargraves JL. Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(6):575–84.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ibrahim SA, Stone RA, Han X, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in surgical outcomes in veterans following knee or hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(10):3143–51.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ayanian JZ, Cleary PD, Keogh JH, Noonan SJ, vid-Kasdan JA, Epstein AM. Physicians’ beliefs about racial differences in referral for renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43(2):350–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gross CP, Vogel EW, Dhond AJ, et al. Factors influencing physicians’ reported use of anticoagulation therapy in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a cross-sectional survey. Clin Ther. 2003;25(6):1750–64.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Raine R, Carter S, Sensky T, Black N. General practitioners’ perceptions of chronic fatigue syndrome and beliefs about its management, compared with irritable bowel syndrome: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004;328(7452):1354–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wright JG, Hawker GA, Bombardier C, et al. Physician enthusiasm as an explanation for area variation in the utilization of knee replacement surgery. Med Care. 1999;37(9):946–56.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, et al. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(10):771–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000;283(13):1715–22.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Dr. Ang is supported in part by a Mentored Patient Oriented Career Development Award (RR017725) from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis C. Ang MD, MS.

Additional information

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest:

None disclosed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ang, D.C., Thomas, K. & Kroenke, K. An Exploratory Study of Primary Care Physician Decision Making Regarding Total Joint Arthroplasty. J GEN INTERN MED 22, 74–79 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0111-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0111-x

Key words

  • total joint arthroplasty
  • primary care physicians
  • osteoarthritis
  • decision making