Skip to main content
Log in

The United States Physician Workforce and International Medical Graduates: Trends and Characteristics

  • Health Policy
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Background

International medical graduates (IMGs) have been a valuable resource for the United States physician workforce, and their contribution to the United States workforce is likely to increase.

Objective

To describe the historical trends and compare the characteristics of IMGs to United States medical graduates (USMGs) in the United States.

Design

Longitudinal analysis of the American Medical Association Physicians’ Professional Data (AMA-PPD) database using the 1978–2004 files and a comparative analysis of the characteristics of a random sample of 1,000 IMGs and a random sample of 1,000 USMGs using the 2004 file.

Measurements

Historical trends and characteristics of IMGs in the United States.

Results

Over the last 26 years, the number of IMGs in the United States grew by 4,873 per year reaching a total of 215,576 in 2004, about 2.4 times its size in 1978. The proportion of IMGs increased 0.12% per year, from 22.2% in 1978 to 25.6% in 2004. In 2004, compared with USMGs, IMGs were older, less likely to be board certified [Odds ratio (OR), 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.86], less likely to work in group practice (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.98), more likely to have Internal Medicine as practice specialty (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.62 to 2.71) and more likely to be residents (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.16).

Conclusions

Over the last quarter century, the IMGs provided a significant and steady supply for the United States physician workforce that continues to grow. Policymakers should consider the consequences for both the United States and source countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grumbach K, Lee PR. How many physicians can we afford? JAMA. 1991;265:2369–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Graduate Medical Education National Advisory Committee. Summary report of the Graduate Medical Education National Advisory Committee to the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, D.C. April 1981.

  3. American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine, American Medical Association, American Osteopathic Association, Association of Academic Health Centers, Association of American Medical Colleges, National Medical Association. Consensus Statement on Physician Workforce. Washington, DC; 1997.

  4. Cooper RA. Weighing the evidence for expanding physician supply. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:705–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper RA, Stoflet SJ, Wartman SA. Perceptions of medical school deans and state medical society executives about physician supply. JAMA. 2003;290:2992–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sunshine J. Overview and Analysis of Information Regarding the Shortage. Chicago, IL: American College of Radiology; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schubert A, Eckhout G, Tremper K. An updated view of national anesthesia personnel shortfall. Anesth Analg. 2003;96:207–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Foot DK, Lewis RP, Pearson TA, Beller GA. Demographics and cardiology, 1950–2050. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1067–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyce ST. The Rochester Community Physician Workforce: Factors Affecting Recruitment and Retention. Rochester, NY: CGR; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Angus DC, Kelly MA, Schmitz RJ, White A, Popovich J. Current and projected workforce requirements for care of the critically ill and patients with pulmonary disease: can we meet the requirements of an aging population? JAMA. 2000;284:2070–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zerehi, R. For the Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians. Creating a New National Workforce for Internal Medicine. A Position Paper: American College of Physicians; 2006.

  12. Weiner JP. Prepaid group practice staffing and U.S. physician supply: lessons for workforce policy. Health Aff. 2004;Suppl Web Exclusives:W4-43–59.

  13. Lurie JD, Goodman DC, Wennberg JE. Benchmarking the future generalist workforce. Eff Clin Pract. 2002; 5:58–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. American Medical Association. H-200.953 The Physician Workforce: Recommendations for Policy Implementation. 2003 January 18, Available at: http://web.archive.org/web/20040207002827/http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/article/print/1616-8229.html. Accessed January 23, 2006.

  15. Association of American Medical Colleges. The physician workforce: position statement. February 2005. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/workforce/12704workforce.pdf. Accessed January 23, 2006.

  16. Council on Graduate Medical Education. Physician Workforce Policy Guidelines for the United States, 2000–2020. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cooper RA. Medical schools and their applicants—an analysis: if more physicians are required, can medical schools fill the gap? Health Aff. 2003;22:71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Blumenthal D. New steam from an old cauldron—the physician-supply debate. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1780–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cooper RA. Impact of trends in primary, secondary, and postsecondary education on applications to medical school. I: Gender considerations. Acad Med 2003;78:855–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. American Medical Association. International Medical Graduates. 2005 Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/1550.html. Accessed January 23, 2006.

  21. American Medical Association. AMA Physicians’ Professional Data. 2004. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/2673.html. Accessed January 23, 2006.

  22. U.S. Department of Agriculture. RUCA Codes. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Rurality/RuralUrbanCommutingAreas/. Accessed January 23, 2006.

  23. Benson JA, Jr., Meskauskas JA, Grosso LJ. Performance of U.S. citizen–foreign medical graduates on certifying examinations in internal medicine. Am J Med. 1981;71:270–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Norcini JJ, Boulet JR, Whelan GP, McKinley DW. Specialty board certification among U.S. Citizen and non-U.S. Citizen graduates of International Medical Schools. Acad Med. 2005;80:S42–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Freshnock LJ, Goodman LJ. The organization of physician services in solo and group medical practice. Med Care. 1980;18:17–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mullan F, Politzer RM, Davis CH. Medical migration and the physician workforce. International medical graduates and American medicine. JAMA. 1995;273:1521–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fink KS, Phillips RL, Jr., Fryer GE, Koehn N. International medical graduates and the primary care workforce for rural underserved areas. Health Aff. 2003;22:255–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mullan F. The metrics of the physician brain drain. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1810–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hallock JA, Seeling SS, Norcini JJ. The international medical graduate pipeline. Health Aff. 2003;22:94–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Regets MC. Research and Policy Issues in High-skilled International Migration: a Perspective with Data from the United States. Arlington VG: National Science Foundation; 2001. Discussion paper 366.

  31. Adams O, Kinnon C. A Public Health Perspective. International Trade in Health Services: a Developmental Perspective. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Gordon Guyatt and Dr. Peter Tugwell for their comments and suggestions. Research for Health in Erie County, Inc. funded this work and was not involved in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. Investigators received salary support from institutional sources. This study was presented as a poster during the SGIM 29th annual meeting (Apr 28 2006).

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elie A. Akl MD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akl, E.A., Mustafa, R., Bdair, F. et al. The United States Physician Workforce and International Medical Graduates: Trends and Characteristics. J GEN INTERN MED 22, 264–268 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0022-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0022-2

Key words

Navigation