Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Venous Invasion Is a Risk Factor for Recurrence of pT1 Gastric Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

Postoperative adjuvant therapy for early gastric cancer (EGC) has not been widely studied, and there are differing indications for postoperative adjuvant therapy between Western and Asian countries. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines do not recommend adjuvant chemotherapy for EGC, but it is unclear whether surgery alone is the most appropriate treatment.

Methods

This is a single-center retrospective study of 1001 consecutive patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for pT1 gastric cancer between 1999 and 2013 at the Wakayama Medical University Hospital.

Results

Recurrence was observed in 12 patients, nine of whom as the result of hematogenous metastasis. In all patients with pT1 gastric cancer (n = 1001), lymph node metastasis was identified as an independent predictive factor for recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 10.910, P = 0.002). In patients with pT1N + gastric cancer, however, the 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was still high, 90.8%. In patients with pT1N + gastric cancer (n = 97), the presence of venous invasion (pT1N + v +) was identified by univariate and multivariate analyses as an independent risk factor for recurrence (HR = 4.791, P = 0.032). In patients with venous invasion, the 5-year DSS rate was significantly lower than that in those without venous invasion (79.3% vs. 95.2%, P = 0.018).

Conclusions

Long-term prognosis of patients with EGC with lymph node metastasis is good, but venous invasion is associated with a higher risk of recurrence. Selective application of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for pT1N + v + gastric cancer may efficiently improve prognosis among patients with EGC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rawla P, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of gastric cancer: Global trends, risk factors and prevention. Prz Gastroenterol. 2019;14:26–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamashima C, Shibuya D, Yamazaki H, Inoue K, Fukao A, Saito H, Sobue T. The Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer screening. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:259–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamashima C, Ogoshi K, Narisawa R, Kishi T, Kato T, Fujita K, Sano M, Tsukioka S. Impact of endoscopic screening on mortality reduction from gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:2460–2466.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lai JF, Kim S, Kim K, Li S, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, Rha SY, Chung HC, Choi SH, Wang LB, Noh SH. Prediction of recurrence of early gastric cancer after curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:1896–1902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Shen JG, Song C, Kim J, Choi SH, Noh SH. The N ratio predicts recurrence and poor prognosis in patients with node-positive early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:377–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ikeda Y, Saku M, Kishihara F, Maehara Y. Effective follow-up for recurrence or a second primary cancer in patients with early gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:235–239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, Matsuda G, Otsuka Y, Ono H, Shimada H. Surgical outcomes for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200:15–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kunisaki C, Makino H, Kimura J, Takagawa R, Kosaka T, Ono HA, Akiyama H, Fukushima T, Nagahori Y, Takahashi M. Impact of lymphovascular invasion in patients with stage I gastric cancer. Surgery. 2010;147:204–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2021;24:1–21.

  10. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines (version 4.2021 gastric cancer). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/gastric.pdf. Accessed 5 Sep 2021.

  11. Kim J, Sun C-L, Mailey B, Prendergast C, Artinyan A, Bhatia S, Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JDI. Race and ethnicity correlate with survival in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:152–160.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Katai H, Ishikawa T, Akazawa K, Isobe Y, Miyashiro I, Oda I, Tsujitani S, Ono H, Tanabe S, Fukagawa T, Nunobe S, Kakeji Y, Nashimoto A. Five-year survival analysis of surgically resected gastric cancer cases in Japan: A retrospective analysis of more than 100,000 patients from the nationwide registry of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2001–2007). Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:144–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Union for International Cancer Control. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, Eight edition. New York: Wiley, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nishibeppu K, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Imamura T, Kosuga T, Okamoto K, Konishi H, Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, Otuji H. Venous invasion as a risk factor for recurrence after gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy for stage III gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yura M, Yoshikawa T, Otsuki S, Yamagata Y, Morita S, Katai H. Is surgery alone sufficient for treating T1 gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastases? Gastric Cancer. 2020;23:349–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge proofreading and editing by Benjamin Phillis at the Clinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AT designed the study and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. AT and TO contributed to data interpretation and critical revision of the manuscript. All the other authors (MK, KH, TG, JK, ST, NF, TN, and HY) contributed to data collection and interpretation and critical review of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript and have agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the study, ensuring that any queries related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are answerable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiyasu Ojima.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study was approved by the Wakayama Medical University Institutional Review Board. All procedures were undertaken in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and later versions. Informed consent to be included in the study, or the equivalent, was obtained from all patients.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takeuchi, A., Ojima, T., Katsuda, M. et al. Venous Invasion Is a Risk Factor for Recurrence of pT1 Gastric Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis. J Gastrointest Surg 26, 757–763 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05238-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05238-0

Keywords

Navigation