Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Treatment for Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

Although the rate of early detection and endoscopic treatment of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is steadily increasing, there are insufficient studies on the long-term outcomes of endoscopic treatment. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the clinical features and long-term outcomes of endoscopic treatment for type 1 gastric NETs.

Methods

Subjects who underwent endoscopic treatment for gastric NETs between March 1997 and December 2015 were included. Clinical features and endoscopic treatment outcomes were retrospectively investigated by reviewing medical records.

Results

In total, 125 subjects underwent endoscopic treatment including forceps biopsy (n = 21), argon plasma coagulation (n = 1), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR, n = 62), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD, n = 41). In total, 103 patients with 114 lesions, who underwent EMR or ESD, were analyzed to evaluate endoscopic and oncologic outcomes. The rates of en bloc resection in the EMR and ESD groups were 91.5% and 97.7%, respectively. Complete resection rates were significantly higher in the ESD group than in the EMR group; it was also higher in < 1-cm small-sized lesions than in 1–2-cm large-sized lesions. Adverse events were similar between the two groups. During a median follow-up period of 63 months, local recurrence rates were 6.5% and 2.4% in the EMR and ESD groups, respectively, and the disease-free survival rate did not differ significantly between the groups.

Conclusion

Endoscopic treatment for type 1 gastric NETs less than 2 cm in diameter and confined to mucosal and submucosal layers could be an effective and safe treatment strategy based on the favorable long-term outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burke AP, Sobin LH, Federspiel BH, Shekitka KM, Helwig EB. Carcinoid tumors of the duodenum. A clinicopathologic study of 99 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1990;114(7):700-4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilligan CJ, Lawton GP, Tang LH, West AB, Modlin IM. Gastric carcinoid tumors: the biology and therapy of an enigmatic and controversial lesion. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90(3):338-52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M. A 50-year analysis of 562 gastric carcinoids: small tumor or larger problem? Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(1):23-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Godwin JD, 2nd. Carcinoid tumors. An analysis of 2,837 cases. Cancer. 1975;36(2):560-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rindi G, Luinetti O, Cornaggia M, Capella C, Solcia E. Three subtypes of gastric argyrophil carcinoid and the gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study. Gastroenterology. 1993;104(4):994-1006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Delle Fave G, Capurso G, Milione M, Panzuto F. Endocrine tumours of the stomach. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;19(5):659-73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruszniewski P, Delle Fave G, Cadiot G, Komminoth P, Chung D, Kos-Kudla B, et al. Well-differentiated gastric tumors/carcinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2006;84(3):158-64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Borch K, Ahrén B, Ahlman H, Falkmer S, Granérus G, Grimelius L. Gastric carcinoids: biologic behavior and prognosis after differentiated treatment in relation to type. Ann Surg. 2005;242(1):64-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Scherübl H, Jensen RT, Cadiot G, Stölzel U, Klöppel G. Management of early gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;3(7):133-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kulke MH, Benson AB, 3rd, Bergsland E, Berlin JD, Blaszkowsky LS, Choti MA, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012;10(6):724-64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kunz PL, Reidy-Lagunes D, Anthony LB, Bertino EM, Brendtro K, Chan JA, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas. 2013;42(4):557-77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Delle Fave G, O'Toole D, Sundin A, Taal B, Ferolla P, Ramage JK, et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for Gastroduodenal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103(2):119-24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas D, Tsolakis AV, Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Fraenkel M, Alexandraki K, Sougioultzis S, et al. Long-term follow-up of a large series of patients with type 1 gastric carcinoid tumors: data from a multicenter study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;168(2):185-93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kwon DH NE, Bergsland EK, Dai SC. Gastric neuroendocrine tumors: management and challenges. Gastrointestinal Cancer: Targets and Therapy. 2017;7:31-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, Paradis V, Rugge M, Schirmacher P, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology. 2020;76(2):182-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ichikawa J, Tanabe S, Koizumi W, Kida Y, Imaizumi H, Kida M, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection in the management of gastric carcinoid tumors. Endoscopy. 2003;35(3):203-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Thomas D, Strosberg JR, Pape UF, Felder S, Tsolakis AV, et al. Metastatic type 1 gastric carcinoid: a real threat or just a myth? World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(46):8687-95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Saund MS, Al Natour RH, Sharma AM, Huang Q, Boosalis VA, Gold JS. Tumor size and depth predict rate of lymph node metastasis and utilization of lymph node sampling in surgically managed gastric carcinoids. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(10):2826-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jeon JH, Cheung DY, Lee SJ, Kim HJ, Kim HK, Cho HJ, et al. Endoscopic resection yields reliable outcomes for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(4):556-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang J, Liu M, Li H, Chen J, Su H, Zheng J, et al. Comparison of endoscopic therapies for rectal carcinoid tumors: Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential incision versus endoscopic submucosal dissection. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2018;42(1):24-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Park HW, Byeon JS, Park YS, Yang DH, Yoon SM, Kim KJ, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of rectal carcinoid tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72(1):143-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sato Y, Takeuchi M, Hashimoto S, Mizuno K, Kobayashi M, Iwafuchi M, et al. Usefulness of endoscopic submucosal dissection for type I gastric carcinoid tumors compared with endoscopic mucosal resection. Hepatogastroenterology. 2013;60(126):1524-9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim HH, Kim GH, Kim JH, Choi MG, Song GA, Kim SE. The efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection of type I gastric carcinoid tumors compared with conventional endoscopic mucosal resection. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:253860.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Suzuki S, Ishii N, Uemura M, Deshpande GA, Matsuda M, Iizuka Y, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(3):759-63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ishikawa H, Imanishi K, Otani T, Okuda S, Tatsuta M, Ishiguro S. Effectiveness of endoscopic treatment of carcinoid tumors of the rectum. Endoscopy. 1989;21(3):133-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Do Hoon Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier survival curves for disease-free survival according to endoscopic treatment (log rank p value = 0.053) (n = 124) (JPG 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noh, J.H., Kim, D.H., Yoon, H. et al. Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Treatment for Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor. J Gastrointest Surg 25, 2495–2502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-04997-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-04997-0

Keywords

Navigation