Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Laparoscopic Converted to Open Gastrectomy on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

It remains unclear whether laparoscopic conversation to open gastrectomy causes higher morbidity and has an adverse effect on the long-term survival outcomes of patients with gastric cancer. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of the conversion on short and long-term outcomes of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Methods

We retrospectively investigated 871 patients who initially underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for pathologically confirmed diagnosis of AGC between February 2009 and April 2018. The patients were grouped as the conversion (CONV) group and completed laparoscopic (LAP) group. The 1:2 propensity score matching was performed to reduce the effect of bias due to the imbalanced baseline features between the two groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for conversion and poor survival.

Results

After propensity-score matching, 168 patients (56 in the CONV group and 112 in the LAP group) were studied. The CONV group was associated with significantly longer operation time (252.4 vs. 216.7 min, P < 0.001) and greater estimated blood loss (234.8 vs. 171.2 ml, P < 0.001) as compared with the LAP group. The time to first flatus (3.8 vs. 3.3 days, P = 0.043), time to start a liquid diet (4.1 vs. 3.5 days, P = 0.021), and postoperative hospital stay (8.7 vs. 7.6 days, P = 0.020) were significantly longer in the CONV group than that in the LAP group. The overall complication rate did not differ significantly between the CONV group and the LAP group (16.1% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.692). Both 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) did not differ significantly between the CONV group and the LAP group (P = 0.805, P = 0.945, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that lymphovascular invasion and stage III were independent prognostic factors for poor OS and DFS, whereas conversion was not.

Conclusions

The conversion from laparoscopic to open gastrectomy had no negative impact on morbidity and long-term survival outcomes for patients with locally AGC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kitano S IY, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:146–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zeng YK, Yang ZL, Peng JS, Lin HS, Cai L. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. Annals of surgery. 2012;256(1):39-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182583e2e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim YW, Yoon HM, Yun YH, Nam BH, Eom BW, Baik YH et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: result of a randomized controlled trial (COACT 0301). Surgical endoscopy. 2013;27(11):4267-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3037-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Deng Y, Zhang Y, Guo TK. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis based on seven randomized controlled trials. Surgical oncology. 2015;24(2):71-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2015.02.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goh PM KA, So JB, Lomanto D, Cheah WK, Muthiah R, Gandhi A. Early experience with laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001;11(2):83-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao Y, Yu P, Hao Y, Qian F, Tang B, Shi Y et al. Comparison of outcomes for laparoscopically assisted and open radical distal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surgical endoscopy. 2011;25(9):2960-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1652-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shinohara T, Satoh S, Kanaya S, Ishida Y, Taniguchi K, Isogaki J et al. Laparoscopic versus open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Surgical endoscopy. 2013;27(1):286-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2442-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li Z, Ji G, Bai B, Yu D, Liu Y, Lian B et al. Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for middle-third advanced gastric cancer. Surgical endoscopy. 2018;32(5):2255-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5919-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yue F GX. Impact of conversion during laparoscopic gastrectomy on outcomes of patients with gastric cancer. J BUON. 2017;22(4):926-31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2016;34(12):1350-7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shuang J, Qi S, Zheng J, Zhao Q, Li J, Kang Z et al. A case-control study of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(1):57-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1361-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Du J ZJ, Li Y, Li J, Ji G, Dong G, Yang Z, Wang W, Gao Z. Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with extended lymph node resection for advanced gastric cancer--reports of 82 cases. Hepatogastroenterology 2010;57.(104):1589-94.

  13. Fang C, Hua J, Li J, Zhen J, Wang F, Zhao Q et al. Comparison of long-term results between laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. American journal of surgery. 2014;208(3):391-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sano T, Coit DG, Kim HH, Roviello F, Kassab P, Wittekind C et al. Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: International Gastric Cancer Association staging project. Gastric cancer: official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. 2017;20(2):217-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0601-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Annals of surgery. 2009;250(2):187-96. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications. Annals of surgery. 2004;240(2):205-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Park YK, Yoon HM, Kim YW, Park JY, Ryu KW, Lee YJ et al. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: results from a randomized phase II multicenter clinical trial (COACT 1001). Annals of surgery. 2017;42(9):S98-S9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi Y, Xu X, Zhao Y, Qian F, Tang B, Hao Y et al. Short-term surgical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer. Surgical endoscopy. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5942-x.

  19. Fujiya K, Tokunaga M, Mori K, Makuuchi R, Tanizawa Y, Bando E et al. Long-term survival in patients with postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Annals of surgical oncology. 2016;23(Suppl 5):809-16. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5577-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsujimoto H, Ichikura T, Ono S, Sugasawa H, Hiraki S, Sakamoto N et al. Impact of postoperative infection on long-term survival after potentially curative resection for gastric cancer. Annals of surgical oncology. 2009;16(2):311-8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0249-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li QG, Li P, Tang D, Chen J, Wang DR. Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after radical resection for gastric cancer. World journal of gastroenterology. 2013;19(25):4060-5. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i25.4060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Li Z, Bai B, Zhao Y, Yu D, Lian B, Liu Y et al. Severity of complications and long-term survival after laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched, case-control study. International journal of surgery. 2018;54(54):62-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoo CH, Kim HO, Hwang SI, Son BH, Shin JH, Kim H. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer during a surgeon’s learning curve period. Surgical endoscopy. 2009;23(10):2250-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0315-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jung DH, Son SY, Park YS, Shin DJ, Ahn HS, Ahn SH et al. The learning curve associated with laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Gastric cancer: official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. 2016;19(1):264-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0447-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Clancy C, O'Leary DP, Burke JP, Redmond HP, Coffey JC, Kerin MJ et al. A meta-analysis to determine the oncological implications of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Disease. 2015;17(6):482-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12875.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ye M JK, Xu G, Lin F, Zhou Q, Tao K, Tao F. Short- and long-term outcomes after conversion of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-center study. J BUON. 2017;22(1):126-33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao B, Zhang J, Chen X, Sun T, Wang Z, Xu H et al. The retrieval of at least 25 lymph nodes should be essential for advanced gastric cancer patients with lymph node metastasis: a retrospective analysis of single-institution database study design: cohort study. International journal of surgery. 2017;48:291-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.11.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zheng G, Feng F, Guo M, Xu G, Liu S, Liu Z et al. Harvest of at least 23 lymph nodes is indispensable for stage N3 gastric cancer patients. Annals of surgical oncology. 2017;24(4):998-1002. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5667-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shen Z, Ye Y, Xie Q, Liang B, Jiang K, Wang S. Effect of the number of lymph nodes harvested on the long-term survival of gastric cancer patients according to tumor stage and location: a 12-year study of 1,637 cases. American journal of surgery. 2015;210(3):431-40 e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.01.029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cho BC, Jeung HC, Choi HJ, Rha SY, Hyung WJ, Cheong JH et al. Prognostic impact of resection margin involvement after extended (D2/D3) gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a 15-year experience at a single institute. Journal of surgical oncology. 2007;95(6):461-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim SY, Hwang YS, Sohn TS, Oh SJ, Choi MG, Noh JH et al. The predictors and clinical impact of positive resection margins on frozen section in gastric cancer surgery. Journal of Gastric Cancer. 2012;12(2):113. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2012.12.2.113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Cunningham SC, Kamangar F, Kim MP, Hammoud S, Haque R, Maitra A et al. Survival after gastric adenocarcinoma resection: eighteen-year experience at a single institution. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9(5):718-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2004.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang SY, Yeh CN, Lee HL, Liu YY, Chao TC, Hwang TL et al. Clinical impact of positive surgical margin status on gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. Annals of surgical oncology. 2009;16(10):2738-43. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0616-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the medical staff of Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases for their management of the database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Fen-gni Xie, Jie Chen, and Zheng-yan Li initiated the study design and wrote the manuscript. Zheng-yan Li and Bing Bai helped with implementation. Dan Song, Shuai Xu, and Xiao-tian Song contributed to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data. Jie Chen and Gang Ji revised and supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gang Ji.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Fengni Xie, Jie Chen, Zhengyan Li, Bing Bai, Dan Song, Shuai Xu, Xiaotian Song, and Gang Ji have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, Fn., Chen, J., Li, Zy. et al. Impact of Laparoscopic Converted to Open Gastrectomy on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 25, 2484–2494 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-04975-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-04975-6

Keywords

Navigation