Skip to main content
Log in

Robotic Total Pancreatectomy: A Novel Pancreatic Head-First Approach (with Video)

  • Multimedia Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The development of the Da Vinci robotic platform has drastically altered the paradigm of minimal invasive pancreatic surgery. However, the evidence of robotic total pancreatectomy (RTP) is still limited. Here we report an alternative approach of RTP, starting with pancreatoduodenectomy (the pancreatic head-first approach).

Methods

The patient was a 55-year-old female with a diagnosis of diffuse PNET in the head, body, and tail of the pancreas. The da Vinci Xi robotic system was used for RTP. Our technique of RTP consists of three steps: (1) pancreatoduodenectomy, (2) (en bloc) distal pancreatectomy, and (3) reconstructions.

Results

The operative time was 490 min with an estimated blood loss of 100 ml. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 10.

Conclusions

RTP is a technically challenging procedure; however, the pancreatic head-first approach of RTP has several advantages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strijker M, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, et al (2013) Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the literature. HPB (Oxford) 15:1-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Konstantinidis IT, Jutric Z, Eng OS, et al (2018) Robotic total pancreatectomy with splenectomy: technique and outcomes. Surg Endosc 32:3691-3696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Mesquita Neto JWB, Macedo FI, Liu Y, et al (2019) Fully robotic total pancreatectomy: technical aspects and outcomes. J Robot Surg 13:77-82

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kosei Takagi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Because this was a single report, and not a trial or observational research, there was no requirement for ethical approval.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Step 1 (pancreatoduodenectomy part). After Kocher’s maneuver including mobilization of the right colon and kocherization of the duodenum, the jejunum is pull into the right upper quadrant space and divided with a linear stapler. The stomach is also transected with a linear stapler. After ensuring complete identification of portal structures, the gastroduodenal artery and common bile duct are divided, followed with dissection of the infrapancreatic superior mesenteric vein (SMV). The pancreatic neck is not transected. Next, complete detachment of the unicinate process from the SMV and superior mesenteric artery is performed. Finally, the pancreatic head and duodenum are completely mobilized. (MP4 120,486 kb)

Step 2 (distal pancreatectomy part). The splenic artery and vein are identified and transected with a linear stapler. After dissection of the inferior border of the pancreas, the mobilization of pancreatic body is facilitated from medial towards the tail, followed with dissection around the spleen. Then specimen is retrieved through the Pfannenstiel incision. (MP4 74,400 kb)

Step 3 (reconstruction part). The interrupted hepaticojejunostomy and antecolic gastrojejunostomy. (MP4 85,038 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takagi, K., Koerkamp, B.G. Robotic Total Pancreatectomy: A Novel Pancreatic Head-First Approach (with Video). J Gastrointest Surg 25, 1649–1650 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-04922-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-04922-5

Keywords

Navigation