Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Association of Adherence to Quality Metrics with Recurrence or Mortality among Veterans with Colorectal Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network has defined metrics for colorectal cancer; however, the association of metric adherence with patient clinical outcomes remains underexplored. The study aim was to evaluate the association of National Comprehensive Cancer Network metric adherence with recurrence and mortality in Veterans with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods

Veterans with stage I–III colorectal cancer who underwent non-emergent resection from 2001 to 2015 at a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center were included. The primary predictor was completion of eligible National Comprehensive Cancer Network metrics. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrence or all-cause death in three phases of care: surgical (up to 6 months after resection), treatment (6–18 months after resection), and surveillance (18 months–3 years after resection). Hazard ratios were estimated via Cox proportional hazards regression in a propensity score–weighted cohort.

Results

A total of 1107 electronic medical records of patients undergoing colorectal surgery were reviewed, and 379 patients were included (301 colon and 78 rectal cancer). In the surgical phase, the weighted analysis yielded a hazard ratio of 0.37 (95% confidence interval 0.12–1.13) for metric-adherent patients compared with non-adherent patients. In the treatment and surveillance phases, the hazard ratios for metric-adherent care were 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.25–1.85) and 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.31–2.68), respectively.

Conclusions

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline metric adherence was associated with a lower rate of recurrence and death in the surgical phase of care among stage I–III patients with resected colorectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Cancer Institute. SEER Cancer Statistics Review. 2019. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html. Accessed 11 Feb 2020.

  2. Zullig LL, Smith VA, Jackson GL, et al. Colorectal Cancer Statistics from the Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry. Clinical Colorectal Cancer. 2016: 15 (4): e199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Colon Cancer. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2020.

  4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Rectal Cancer. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/rectal_blocks.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2020.

  5. Chao HH, Schwartz AR, Hersh J, et al. Improving colorectal cancer screening and care in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare system. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2009;8(1):22-28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Snyder RA, Mainthia R, Patel R, Dittus RS, Roumie CL. Quality of colorectal cancer care among veterans: a 10-year retrospective cohort. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(8):2476-2483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson GL, Melton LD, Abbott DH, et al. Quality of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(19):3176-3181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boland GM, Chang GJ, Haynes AB, et al. Association between adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines and improved survival in patients with colon cancer. Cancer. 2013;119(8):1593-1601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Malin JL, Schneider EC, Epstein AM, Adams J, Emanuel EJ, Kahn KL. Results of the National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(4):626-634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1731-1740.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. André T, Boni C, Navarro M, et al. Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(19):3109-3116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. PA Harris, R Taylor, R Thielke, J Payne, N Gonzalez, JG Conde. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr; 42(2):377-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Benson AB 3rd, Schrag D, Somerfield MR, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(16):3408-3419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johansen C, Schou G, Soll-Johanning H, Mellemgaard A, Lynge E. Influence of marital status on survival from colon and rectal cancer in Denmark. Br J Cancer. 1996; 74:985–988.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang L, Wilson SE, Stewart DB, Hollenbeak CS. Marital status and colon cancer outcomes in US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries: does marriage affect cancer survival by gender and stage? Cancer epidemiology. 2011; 35:417–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pisarska M, Torbicz G, Gajewska N, et al. Compliance with the ERAS Protocol and 3-Year Survival After Laparoscopic Surgery for Non-metastatic Colorectal Cancer. World J Surg. 2019;43(10):2552-2560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li L, Greene T. A weighting analogue to pair matching in propensity score analysis. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2013; 9(2), 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R Core Team (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson GL, Zullig LL, Zafar SY, et al. Using NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology to measure the quality of colorectal cancer care in the Veterans health administration. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2013;11(4):431-441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Romanus D, Weiser MR, Skibber JM, et al. Concordance with NCCN Colorectal Cancer Guidelines and ASCO/NCCN Quality Measures: an NCCN institutional analysis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7(8):895-904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mason MC, Chang GJ, Petersen LA, et al. National Quality Forum Colon Cancer Quality Metric Performance: How Are Hospitals Measuring Up? Ann Surg. 2017;266(6):1013-1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. National Quality Forum. Endorsement Summary: Cancer Measures. http://www.qualityforum.org/News_And_Resources/Press_Releases/2012/NQF_Endorses_Additional_Cancer_Measures.aspx. Accessed 11 Feb 2020.

  23. Hines RB, Barrett A, Twumasi-Ankrah P, et al. Predictors of guideline treatment nonadherence and the impact on survival in patients with colorectal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13(1):51-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, et al. Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(15):2912-2919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wells KO, Hawkins AT, Krishnamurthy DM, et al. Omission of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Is Associated With Increased Mortality in Patients With T3N0 Colon Cancer With Inadequate Lymph Node Harvest. Dis Colon rectum. 2017;60(1):15-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9666):821-828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(2):303-312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kitz J, Fokas E, Beissbarth T, et al. Association of Plane of Total Mesorectal Excision With Prognosis of Rectal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(8):e181607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hill SS, Chung SK, Meyer DC, et al. Impact of Preoperative Care for Rectal Adenocarcinoma on Pathologic Specimen Quality and Postoperative Morbidity: A NSQIP Analysis. J Am Coll Surg. October 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.09.004

  30. Primrose JN, Perera R, Gray A, et al. Effect of 3 to 5 years of scheduled CEA and CT follow-up to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer: the FACS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311(3):263-270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosati G, Ambrosini G, Barni S, et al. A randomized trial of intensive versus minimal surveillance of patients with resected Dukes B2-C colorectal carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(2):274-280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Snyder RA, Hu C-Y, Cuddy A, et al. Association Between Intensity of Posttreatment Surveillance Testing and Detection of Recurrence in Patients With Colorectal Cancer. JAMA. 2018;319(20):2104-2115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jennifer Wharton, BS, for her contributions to IRB preparation. This work was supported by the Office of Academic Affiliations, Department of Veterans Affairs, VA National Quality Scholars Program, and with the use of facilities at VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.

Funding

Dr. Edwards is supported by the Office of Academic Affiliations, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) National Quality Scholars Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: Edwards, Martin, Wyman, Snyder, Bailey, Roumie

Acquisition of data: Edwards, Martin, Snyder

Analysis and interpretation of data: Edwards, Samuels, Roumie

Drafting of the manuscript: Edwards, Samuels, Roumie

Critical revision of the manuscript: Edwards, Martin, Samuels, Wyman, Bailey, Kiernan, Snyder, Dittus, Roumie

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gretchen C. Edwards MD, MPH.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 442 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Edwards, G.C., Martin, R.L., Samuels, L.R. et al. Association of Adherence to Quality Metrics with Recurrence or Mortality among Veterans with Colorectal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 25, 2055–2064 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04804-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04804-2

Keywords

Navigation