Skip to main content
Log in

Tangential Venous Resections during Robotic-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy: the Results of a Case Series (with Video)

  • Multimedia Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

Despite the potential advantages in terms of microdissection and microsuturing capabilites, the robotic approach for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is scarcely reported.

Methods

We report our technique for a robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy with tangential Portal/ Superior Mesenteric Vein resection/reconstruction (RPD PV/SMV).We also compared the surgical outcomes of eight consecutive patients undergoing RPD PV/SMV with that of sixty patients who underwent robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) in the same period of time.

Results

A total of eight consecutive patients underwent RPD PV/SMV. We observed an increased estimated blood loss (550 vs 280 mL, p = 0.003) and operative time (438 vs 350 min, p = 0.002) in the RPD PV/SMV group of patients compared with RPD group, whereas the complication rate (28% vs 31%, p = 0.726) was similar. No venous-congestion related complications were observed in the postoperative course. The median length of hospital stay was similar in the RPD group in comparison to that in the RPD PV/SMV group (10 vs 13 range 6-19 days, p = 0.313).

Conclusion

RPD PV/SMV is a challenging operation. It is associated with higher operative time and increased estimated blood loss in comparison to standard RPD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with major vascular resection: a comparison of laparoscopic versus open approaches. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jan;19(1):189-94; discussion 194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2644-8

  2. Ohgi K, Yamamoto Y, Sugiura T, Okamura Y, Ito T, Ashida R et al. Is Pancreatic Head Cancer with Portal Venous Involvement Really Borderline Resectable? Appraisal of an Upfront Surgery Series. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;24(9):2752-276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marino MV, Podda M, Pisanu A, di Saverio S, Fleitas MG. Robotic-assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Technique Description and Performance Evaluation After 60 Cases [published online ahead of print, 2020 Jan 7]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000751.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• The minimally invasive approach for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is scarcely reported.

• Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy with type I venous resection (SMV/PV) is safe and feasible in well-selected cases and in experienced hands.

• Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy with SMV/PV resection is associated with longer operative time and increased estimated blood loss.

Electronic supplementary material

(MP4 400,953 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marino, M.V., Latteri, M.A. & Ahmad, A. Tangential Venous Resections during Robotic-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy: the Results of a Case Series (with Video). J Gastrointest Surg 24, 1920–1921 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04603-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04603-9

Keywords

Navigation