Skip to main content
Log in

Reply to the Letter: “Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Has Superiority in R0 Resection over Open Hepatectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma? The Evidence Is Unreliable”

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Wei F, Wang G, Ding J, et al. Is It Time to Consider Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma? A Meta-Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Oct 16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04404-9. [Epub ahead of print]

  2. Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(9):820–826.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinoshita M, Kanazawa A, Takemura S, et al. Indications for laparoscopic liver resection of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2019 Mar 28. https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12703. [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin SP, Drake J, Wach MM, et al. Laparoscopic Approach to Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma is Associated with an Exacerbation of Inadequate Nodal Staging. Ann Surg Oncol 2019;26:1851–1857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ratti F, Cipriani F, Ariotti R, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based casematched analysis from a single institution. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 1999–2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wei F, Lu C, Cai L, et al. Can laparoscopic liver resection provide a favorable option for patients with large or multiple intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas? Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 3646–3655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Doi SA, Barendregt JJ, Khan S, et al. Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials I: The inverse variance heterogeneity model. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45(Pt A):130–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Comparative Short-term Benefits of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing. Ann Surg 2016; 263: 761–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ogiso S, Nomi T, Araki K, et al. Laparoscopy-Specific Surgical Concepts for Hepatectomy Based on the Laparoscopic Caudal View: A Key to Reboot Surgeons’ Minds. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22: S327–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maissenhaelter BE, Woolmore AL, Schlag PM. Real-world evidence research based on big data: Motivation-challenges-success factors. Onkologe (Berl).2018; 24(Suppl2):91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Geldof T, Huys I, Van Dyck W. Real-World Evidence Gathering in Oncology: The Need for a Biomedical Big Data Insight-Providing Federated Network. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019; 6:43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fangqiang Wei.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, F. Reply to the Letter: “Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Has Superiority in R0 Resection over Open Hepatectomy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma? The Evidence Is Unreliable”. J Gastrointest Surg 24, 451–453 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04477-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04477-6

Navigation