Skip to main content

Composite Length of Stay, An Outcome Measure of Postoperative and Readmission Length of Stays in Pancreatoduodenectomy

Abstract

Purpose

Postoperative length of stay (PLOS) and readmission rate are pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) outcome measures, which are reported individually but may be interrelated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how well a composite length of stay measure (CLOS) that included PLOS and readmission length of stay describes outcomes. To do so, we evaluated how well CLOS correlated to postoperative complications absolutely and compared to PLOS.

Methods

A total of 668 PDs performed between 2011 and 2018 were evaluated. CLOS was calculated from PLOS and readmission length of stay. Complication severity was judged by the Modified Accordion Grading System (MAGS). Multinomial logistical regression models (MLRM) were used to investigate the relationship between either PLOS or CLOS and complications. Multilevel and pairwise area under curves (AUC) using SAS macro %MultAUC were provided for both models.

Results

A total of 432 of 668 patients (65%) developed complications. One hundred seventy-seven patients (27%) were readmitted. Mean PLOS was 10.2 days (7.1 SD) and mean CLOS was 12.3 days (10.1 SD). PLOS and CLOS both were correlated linearly to MAGS grade. Spearman correlation coefficient for CLOS vs. MAGS of 0.68 was higher than that of 0.49 for PLOS vs. MAGS. Multilevel AUC from MLRM using PLOS was 0.66, but multilevel AUC from MLRM using CLOS was 0.71.

Discussion

CLOS provides an accurate estimate of hospital day utilization per patient for PD, reflecting not only the basal hospital recovery time for PD but the added time needed because of readmissions due to complications. It is tightly correlated to number and severity of postoperative complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Emick DM, Riall TS, Cameron JL, Winter JM, Lillemoe KD, Coleman J, et al. Hospital readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1243-52; discussion 52-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kent TS, Sachs TE, Callery MP, Vollmer CM, Jr. Readmission after major pancreatic resection: a necessary evil? J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:515-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmad SA, Edwards MJ, Sutton JM, Grewal SS, Hanseman DJ, Maithel SK, et al. Factors influencing readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multi-institutional study of 1302 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256:529-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kastenberg ZJ, Morton JM, Visser BC, Norton JA, Poultsides GA. Hospital readmission after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: an emerging quality metric? HPB. 2013;15:142-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hyder O, Dodson RM, Nathan H, Schneider EB, Weiss MJ, Cameron JL, et al. Influence of patient, physician, and hospital factors on 30-day readmission following pancreatoduodenectomy in the United States. JAMA Surgery. 2013;14812:1095-102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sadot E, Brennan MF, Lee SY, Allen PJ, Gonen M, Groeger JS, et al. Readmission after pancreatic resection: causes and causality pattern. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:4342-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sutton JM, Wilson GC, Wima K, Hoehn RS, Cutler Quillin R, 3rd, Hanseman DJ, et al. Readmission After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Influence of the Volume Effect Beyond Mortality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3785-92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schneider EB, Canner JK, Gani F, Kim Y, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, et al. Early versus late hospital readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Journal of Surgical Research. 2015;196(1):74-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mazmudar A, Castle J, Yang AD, Bentrem DJ. The association of length of hospital stay with readmission after elective pancreatic resection. J Surg Oncol. 2018;118:7-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Catena R, Dopson S, Holweg M. On the tension between standardized and customized policies in health care: The case of length-of-stay reduction. J Oper Manag. 2019;65:1-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Porembka MR, Hall BL, Hirbe M, Strasberg SM. Quantitative weighting of postoperative complications based on the accordion severity grading system: demonstration of potential impact using the american college of surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210:286-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111(5):518-26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2009;250:177-86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kendrick ML, van Hilst J, Boggi U, de Rooij T, Walsh RM, Zeh HJ, et al. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB. 2017;19:215-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nassour I, Wang SC, Christie A, Augustine MM, Porembka MR, Yopp AC, et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity-matched Study From a National Cohort of Patients. Ann Surg. 2018;268(1):151-7.

  16. Beal EW, Bagante F, Paredes A, Chen Q, Akgul O, Merath K, et al. Index versus Non-index Readmission After Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery: Where Do Patients Go to Be Readmitted? J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:702-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the SPORE Grant 5P50 CA196510 (G.A.W., J.L.). REDCap is supported by Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) grant UL1 TR000449 and Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center and NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA091842.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.A.W., J.L., participated in study conception and design, analysis, and drafting of the article.

G.A.W., J.L., W.C.C., W.G.H., R.C.F., D.E.S., M.B.D., C.W.H., A.S.K., participated in acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data.

S.M.S. participated in study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven M. Strasberg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict(s) of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, G.A., Liu, J., Chapman, W.C. et al. Composite Length of Stay, An Outcome Measure of Postoperative and Readmission Length of Stays in Pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 24, 2062–2069 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04475-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04475-8

Keywords

  • Postopertaive length of stay
  • Composite length of stay
  • Readmission length of stay
  • Readmission rate
  • Length of stay
  • Pancreatoduodenectomy
  • Whipple procedure
  • MAGS
  • Modified Accordion Grading System
  • Postopertaive complications