Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Tumor Location on Lymph Node Metastasis and Survival for Early Gastric Cancer: a Population-Based Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

The question that whether the criteria for endoscopic resection of early gastric non-cardia cancer (GNCC) is appropriate for early gastric cardia cancer (GCC) remains unclear. Thus, our aim was to evaluate the influence of tumor location on lymph node metastasis (LNM) and overall survival (OS) for early gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

A total of 5440 early GC patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were identified. Multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of tumor location on LNM and OS for early GC.

Results

The rate of LNM was 17.48% for early GCC patients (232/1327) and 18.62% for early GNCC patients (766/4113). The early GCC patients experienced no significantly different risk of LNM compared with the early GNCC patients (adjusted OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.76–1.12, P = 0.405). The early GC patients were further stratified by node status. Tumor location was not a predictor of OS for node-negative early GC patients (adjusted HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.96–1.21, P = 0.225) but a predictor of OS for node-positive early GC patients (adjusted HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.48–2.20, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Tumor location was not a predictor of LNM for early GC patients. Moreover, tumor location was not a predictor of OS for node-negative early GC patients. Thus, the criteria for endoscopic resection of early GNCC might be appropriate for the treatment of early GCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, et al. The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. JAMA oncology. 2015;1:505–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McCall MD, Graham PJ, Bathe OF. Quality of life: A critical outcome for all surgical treatments of gastric cancer. World journal of gastroenterology. 2016;22:1101–1113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pyo JH, Lee H, Min BH, et al. Long-Term Outcome of Endoscopic Resection vs. Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer: A Non-inferiority-Matched Cohort Study. 2016;111:240–249.

  4. Choi IJ, Lee JH, Kim YI, et al. Long-term outcome comparison of endoscopic resection and surgery in early gastric cancer meeting the absolute indication for endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:333–341.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gong EJ, Kim DH, Ahn JY, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. Gastric cancer. 2017;20:84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. M. Definition and gross classification of early gastric cancer. Gann Monogr Cancer Res. 1971;11:53–55.

  7. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric cancer. 2011;14:113–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ajani JA DAT. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Gastric Cancer Guidelines. National Comprehensive Cancer Network;2018: Version 1.2018. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hasuike N, Ono H, Boku N, et al. A non-randomized confirmatory trial of an expanded indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection for intestinal-type gastric cancer (cT1a): the Japan Clinical Oncology Group study (JCOG0607). Gastric cancer. 2018;21:114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Z, Graham DY, Khan A, et al. Incidence of gastric cancer in the USA during 1999 to 2013: a 50-state analysis. International journal of epidemiology. 2018.

  11. Botterweck AA, Schouten LJ, Volovics A, Dorant E, van Den Brandt PA. Trends in incidence of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in ten European countries. International journal of epidemiology. 2000;29:645–654.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Petrelli F, Ghidini M, Barni S, et al. Prognostic Role of Primary Tumor Location in Non-Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 50 Studies. Annals of surgical oncology. 2017;24:2655–2668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saito H, Fukumoto Y, Osaki T, et al. Distinct recurrence pattern and outcome of adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia in comparison with carcinoma of other regions of the stomach. World journal of surgery. 2006;30:1864–1869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Amini N, Spolverato G, Kim Y, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric cardia adenocarcinoma: a multi-institutional US study. Journal of surgical oncology. 2015;111:285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maeda H, Okabayashi T, Nishimori I, et al. Clinicopathologic features of adenocarcinoma at the gastric cardia: is it different from distal cancer of the stomach? Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2008;206:306–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang Q, Cheng Y, Chen L, et al. Low risk of lymph node metastasis in 495 early gastric cardiac carcinomas: a multicenter clinicopathologic study of 2101 radical gastrectomies for early gastric carcinoma. Gastric cancer. 2018;31:1599–1607.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pyo JH, Lee H. Indication for endoscopic treatment based on the risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with Siewert type II/III early gastric cancer. Modern Pathology. 2018;21:672–679.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut. 2001;48:225–229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sugimoto T, Okamoto M, Mitsuno Y, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an effective and safe therapy for early gastric neoplasms: a multicenter feasible study. Journal of clinical gastroenterology. 2012;46:12412–12419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study. Gut. 2009;58:331–336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kang HJ, Kim DH, Jeon TY, et al. Lymph node metastasis from intestinal-type early gastric cancer: experience in a single institution and reassessment of the extended criteria for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:508–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nam MJ, Oh SJ, Oh CA, et al. Frequency and predictive factors of lymph node metastasis in mucosal cancer. Journal of gastric cancer. 2010;10:162–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sekiguchi M, Oda I, Taniguchi H, et al. Risk stratification and predictive risk-scoring model for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:961–970.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen L, Wang YH, Cheng YQ, et al. Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in 1620 early gastric carcinoma radical resections in Jiangsu Province in China: A multicenter clinicopathological study. Journal of digestive diseases. 2017;18:556–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Du MZ, Gan WJ, Yu J, et al. Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in 734 early gastric carcinoma radical resections in a Chinese population. Journal of digestive diseases. 2018;19:586–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Okholm C, Svendsen LB, Achiam MP. Status and prognosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with cardia cancer - a systematic review. Surgical oncology. 2014;23:140–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hyung WJ, Cheong JH, Kim J, Chen J, Choi SH, Noh SH. Application of minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer. Journal of surgical oncology. 2004;85:181–185; discussion 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 2006;355:11–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. The New England journal of medicine. 2001;345:725–730.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This project is supported by Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (819QN375, 2017CXTD0012) and Hainan Provincial Key R&D Program (ZDYF2018101).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: Z.L.Y., Z.Y. C., C.X.W., Z.K.C., and J.H.L.. Acquisition of data: Z.L.Y., Z.Y. C., C.X.W., Z.K.C., and J.H.L.. Analysis and interpretation of data: all authors. Drafting of manuscript: all authors. Critical revision: all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhang KeCheng or Wang ChunXi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All the patients in this study were included from the SEER database, and we have got the permission of using the data.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

ZeLong, Y., ZhenYu, C., JianHai, L. et al. Influence of Tumor Location on Lymph Node Metastasis and Survival for Early Gastric Cancer: a Population-Based Study. J Gastrointest Surg 24, 1978–1986 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04367-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04367-x

Keywords

Navigation