Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis and Micrometastasis Along the Left Side of Superior Mesenteric Artery in Pancreatic Head Cancer

  • 2018 SSAT Quick Shot Presentation
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Backgrounds and Objectives

Although metastasis in lymph nodes along the left side of superior mesenteric artery (SMA-LNs-lt) is sometimes found, survival benefit of SMA-LN-lt dissection for pancreatic head cancer is still unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of SMA-LN-lt metastasis and micrometastasis.

Methods

A total of 166 patients with pancreatic head cancer who underwent pancreatectomy with lymphadenectomy including SMA-LNs-lt between 2002 and 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Micrometastasis was evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

Results

Twenty patients (12%) had SMA-LN-lt metastasis detected by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, and eight patients (5%) had micrometastasis. Patients with SMA-LN-lt HE-positive or micrometastasis group experienced significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than those without (p = .015). In multivariate analysis, SMA-LN-lt HE-positive or micrometastasis (p = .034), portal vein resection (p = .002), histologic grade 2/3 (p = .046), LN metastasis (p = .002), and lack of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < .001) were independent risk factors. Within a subset of SMA-LN-lt HE-positive or micrometastasis group, lack of adjuvant chemotherapy (p = .003) was the independent poor prognostic factor.

Conclusions

In pancreatic head cancer, the rate of SMA-LN-lt HE-positive and micrometastasis was found in 12% and 5%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy may contribute to improvement of prognosis in patients with LN metastasis including SMA-LN-lt metastasis and micrometastasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li D, Xie K, Wolff R, Abbruzzese JL. Pancreatic cancer. The Lancet. 2004;363:1049–1057.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1605–1617.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kondo N, Murakami Y, Uemura K, et al. A phase 1 study of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/S-1 (GAS) combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;79:775–781.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C, et al. Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;156:591–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, and Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours, eighth edition. Oxford, UK; Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (8th ed), New York, Springer, 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Version 2. 2018 ed 2018. Available from http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/pancreatic.pdf. Accessed July 10, 2018.

  8. Komo T, Murakami Y, Kondo N, et al. Prognostic Impact of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Micrometastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2019–2027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee SE, Jang JY, Kim MA, Kim SW. Clinical implications of immunohistochemically demonstrated lymph node micrometastasis in resectable pancreatic cancer. J Korean Med Sci. 2011;26:881–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurahara H, Takao S, Maemura K, et al. Impact of lymph node micrometastasis in patients with pancreatic head cancer. World J Surg. 2007;31:483–490; discussion 491-482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kayahara M, Funaki K, Tajima H, et al. Surgical Implication of Micrometastasis for Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreas. 2010;39:884–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwarz L, Lupinacci RM, Svrcek M, et al. Para-aortic lymph node sampling in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2014;101:530–538.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nimura Y, Nagino M, Takao S, et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: long-term results of a Japanese multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Michalski CW, Kleeff J, Wente MN, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:265–273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Golse N, Lebeau R, Lombard-Bohas C, et al. Lymph node involvement beyond peripancreatic region in pancreatic head cancers. Pancreas. 2013;42:239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jamieson NB, Foulis AK, Oien KA, et al. Positive mobilization margins alone do not influence survival following pancreatico-duodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2010;251:1003–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanda M, Fujii T, Nagai S, et al. Pattern of Lymph Node Metastasis Spread in Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreas. 2011;40:951–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malleo G, Maggino L, Capelli P, et al. Reappraisal of Nodal Staging and Study of Lymph Node Station Involvement in Pancreaticoduodenectomy with the Standard International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery Definition of Lymphadenectomy for Cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221:367–379 e364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shinchi H, Maemura K, Mataki Y, et al. A phase II study of oral S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy with S-1 alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:152–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sudo K, Yamaguchi T, Ishihara T, et al. Phase II study of oral S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80:119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ishii H, Furuse J, Boku N, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine chemotherapy alone for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: JCOG0506. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40:573–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ueno H, Ioka T, Ikeda M, et al. Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine plus S-1, S-1 alone, or gemcitabine alone in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan and Taiwan: GEST study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1640–1648.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Okusaka T, Miyakawa H, Fujii H, et al. Updated results from GEST study: a randomized, three-arm phase III study for advanced pancreatic cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concepts: Kenjiro Okada, Yoshiaki Murakami, Naru Kondo, Kenichiro Uemura, Naoya Nakagawa, Shingo Seo, Shinya Takahashi, and Taijiro Sueda.

Study design: Kenjiro Okada, Yoshiaki Murakami, Naru Kondo, Kenichiro Uemura, Naoya Nakagawa.

Data acquisition: Kenjiro Okada, Yoshiaki Murakami, Naru Kondo, Kenichiro Uemura, Naoya Nakagawa, Shingo Seo.

Quality control of data and algorithms: Yoshiaki Murakami, Naru Kondo, Kenichiro Uemura.

Data analysis and interpretation: Kenjiro Okada, Yoshiaki Murakami, Naru Kondo, Kenichiro Uemura, Naoya Nakagawa, Shingo Seo.

Statistical analysis: Kenjiro Okada, Yoshiaki Murakami, Naru Kondo, Kenichiro Uemura, Naoya Nakagawa.

Manuscript preparation: Kenjiro Okada, Yoshiaki Murakami, Naru Kondo, Kenichiro Uemura, Naoya Nakagawa.

Manuscript editing: Yoshiaki Murakami, Naru Kondo, Kenichiro Uemura.

Manuscript review: Kenjiro Okada, Yoshiaki Murakami, Naru Kondo.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenjiro Okada.

Ethics declarations

The study protocol and informed consent form were consistent with the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hiroshima University.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Synopsis

In pancreatic head cancer, pancreatoduodenectomy with SMA-LN-lt dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy may contribute to the improvement of prognosis in patients with lymph node metastasis including SMA-LN-lt metastasis and micrometastasis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okada, K., Murakami, Y., Kondo, N. et al. Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis and Micrometastasis Along the Left Side of Superior Mesenteric Artery in Pancreatic Head Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 23, 2100–2109 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04359-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04359-x

Keywords

Navigation