Skip to main content
Log in

Gender Differences in Gastric Cancer Survival: 99,922 Cases Based on the SEER Database

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate gender differences in initial presentation, pathology and outcomes with GC (GC).

Methods

The 1973–2013 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) 17-registry database was analysed for renal tumours from 1973 to 2013 coded as primary site “stomach”. After various exclusions, a final study group of 99,922 cases with complete data was obtained. Demographic variables analysed included age, sex, marital status and race. Tumour variables included size, stage at diagnosis, grade, primary site, treatment and histology. Primary outcome variables included overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

Overall, 96,501 gastric cancer patients were identified. Of those, 34,862 (36.2%) were women. For woman, log-rank test showed that OS and CSS were significantly longer in man (p < 0.0001). In Cox regression analysis, woman was associated with a significantly improved OS [(HR of death in 1973 to 2003 = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.85–0.89, P < 0.001) (HR of death in 2004 to 2013 = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.91–0.97, P < 0.001)] and cancer-specific survival [(HR of death in 1973 to 2003 = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.87–0.92, P < 0.001) (HR of death in 2004 to 2013 = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.87–0.93, P < 0.001)]. When performing a Kaplan-Meier curve analysis after propensity score matching, gender persisted to be a significant survival of woman for OS and CSS.

Conclusions

Men present with larger, higher stage, higher grade GC than women. OS and CSS are better in women, which is significantly different.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. Jan-Feb 2014;64(1):9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matsuda T, Saika K. The 5-year relative survival rate of stomach cancer in the USA, Europe and Japan. Japanese journal of clinical oncology. Nov 2013;43(11):1157–1158.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rawicz-Pruszynski K, van Sandick JW, Mielko J, Cisel B, Polkowski WP. Current challenges in gastric cancer surgery: European perspective. Surgical oncology. Dec 2018;27(4):650–656.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Karimi P, Islami F, Anandasabapathy S, Freedman ND, Kamangar F. Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. May 2014;23(5):700–713.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). Apr 2013;49(6):1374–1403.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leoncini E, Vukovic V, Cadoni G, et al. Tumour stage and gender predict recurrence and second primary malignancies in head and neck cancer: a multicentre study within the INHANCE consortium. European journal of epidemiology. Dec 2018;33(12):1205–1218.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Uhlig A, Seif Amir Hosseini A, Simon J, et al. Gender specific differences in disease-free, cancer specific and overall survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis The Journal of urology. Jul 2018;200(1):48–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fitchett EJA, Seale AC, Vergnano S, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for Newborn Infection (STROBE-NI): an extension of the STROBE statement for neonatal infection research. The Lancet. Infectious diseases. Oct 2016;16(10):e202-e213.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aron M, Nguyen MM, Stein RJ, Gill IS. Impact of gender in renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of the SEER database. European urology. Jul 2008;54(1):133–140.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mungan NA, Aben KK, Schoenberg MP, et al. Gender differences in stage-adjusted bladder cancer survival. Urology. Jun 2000;55(6):876–880.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Song M, Kang D, Yang JJ, et al. Age and sex interactions in gastric cancer incidence and mortality trends in Korea. Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Jul 2015;18(3):580–589.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim HW, Kim JH, Lim BJ, et al. Sex disparity in gastric cancer: female sex is a poor prognostic factor for advanced gastric cancer. Annals of surgical oncology. Dec 2016;23(13):4344–4351.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Y, Wang G, He J, et al. Gender differences in colorectal cancer survival: a meta-analysis. International journal of cancer. Nov 15 2017;141(10):1942–1949.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gan L, He J, Zhang X, et al. Expression profile and prognostic role of sex hormone receptors in gastric cancer. BMC cancer. Dec 2 2012;12:566.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fang Z, Zhang T, Dizeyi N, et al. Androgen receptor enhances p27 degradation in prostate cancer cells through rapid and selective TORC2 activation. The Journal of biological chemistry.Jan 13 2012;287(3):2090–2098.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu X, Gao Y, Ye H, et al. Positive feedback loop mediated by protein phosphatase 1alpha mobilization of P-TEFb and basal CDK1 drives androgen receptor in prostate cancer. Nucleic acids research. Apr 20 2017;45(7):3738–3751.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshida S, Aihara K, Ikeda Y, et al. Androgen receptor promotes sex-independent angiogenesis in response to ischemia and is required for activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling. Circulation. Jul 2 2013;128(1):60–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ozguroglu M, Demir G. Expression of p53 protein and resistance to preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma. Cancer. Aug 1 1999;86(3):547–549.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Koivisto PA, Rantala I. Amplification of the androgen receptor gene is associated with P53 mutation in hormone-refractory recurrent prostate cancer. The Journal of pathology. Jan 1999;187(2):237–241.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu W, Karelia D, Pramanik K, et al. Phenylbutyl isoselenocyanate induces reactive oxygen species to inhibit androgen receptor and to initiate p53-mediated apoptosis in LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Molecular carcinogenesis. Aug 2018;57(8):1055–1066.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Feng H, Cheng AS, Tsang DP, et al. Cell cycle-related kinase is a direct androgen receptor-regulated gene that drives beta-catenin/T cell factor-dependent hepatocarcinogenesis. The Journal of clinical investigation. Aug 2011;121(8):3159–3175.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Grumolato L, Liu G, Haremaki T, et al. beta-Catenin-independent activation of TCF1/LEF1 in human hematopoietic tumor cells through interaction with ATF2 transcription factors. PLoS genetics. 2013;9(8):e1003603.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Austin PC. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies. Statistics in medicine. Sep 10 2010;29(20):2137–2148.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CZ and HL conceived and designed the study. ZW, CW, WC and YH performed the statistical analysis. HL and ZW wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yulong He or Changhua Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Huafu Li and Zhewei Wei are joint first authors.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

Univariate Cox Analyses of GC Patients According to Various Clinicopathological Variables. A and B, Analyses of OS in 1973–2003 and 2004–2013. C and D, Analyses of CSS in 1973–2003 and 2004–2013. (ZIP 8.89 mb)

ESM 2

Multivariate Cox Analyses of GC Patients According to Various Clinicopathological Variables. A and B, Analyses of OS in 1973–2003 and 2004–2013. C and D, Analyses of CSS in 1973–2003 and 2004–2013. (ZIP 7.33 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Wei, Z., Wang, C. et al. Gender Differences in Gastric Cancer Survival: 99,922 Cases Based on the SEER Database. J Gastrointest Surg 24, 1747–1757 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04304-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04304-y

Keywords

Navigation