Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical and Survival Outcomes Using Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Tube Alone or Subsequent Interval Cholecystectomy to Treat Acute Cholecystitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCT) is a safe method of gallbladder drainage in the setting of severe or complicated acute cholecystitis (AC), particularly in patients who are high-risk surgical candidates. Small case series suggest that PCT aids resolution of acute cholecystitis in up to 90% of patients. However, reluctance is observed in utilising PCT more frequently, due to concerns that we are committing comorbid patients to an interval surgical procedure for which they may not be suitable.

Aim

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and survival outcomes of PCT use, with particular emphasis on a subgroup of patients who did not proceed to cholecystectomy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients with severe acute cholecystitis who required PCT insertion in a tertiary referral hospital from 2010 to 2015. Patient demographics and clinical data including systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) scores at presentation, readmissions and clinical and survival outcomes were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.22 and GraphPad Prism v.7.

Results

In total, 157 patients (59% males) with AC underwent PCT insertion during the study period. Median age at presentation was 71 years (range 29–94). A median SIRS score of 3 was noted at presentation. Patients required a median of two cholecystostomy tube changes/replacements (range 1–10) during treatment. Transhepatic tube placement was the preferred approach (69%) with 31% of tubes being placed via transabdominal approach. Only 55% proceeded to interval cholecystectomy. Of the 70 patients treated with PCT alone, their median age was 75 years. In this subgroup, only 12.9% (n = 9) developed recurrent biliary sepsis necessitating readmission following initial resolution of symptoms and tube removal. All episodes of recurrent biliary sepsis presented within 6 months of index presentation, and definitive PCT removal in this group was performed at a median of 3 months. No difference in survival was observed between both groups.

Conclusion

Almost 90% of patients with AC who are managed definitively with a PCT will recover uneventfully without recurrent sepsis following PCT removal. This is a viable option for older, comorbid patients who are unfit for surgical intervention and is not associated with significantly increased mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baron, T. H., Grimm, I. S. & Swanstrom, L. L. Interventional Approaches to Gallbladder Disease. N. Engl. J. Med.373, 357–365 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gurusamy, K. S., Rossi, M. & Davidson, B. R. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007088.pub2

  3. Chang, Y. R. et al. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in patients with high comorbidity and re-evaluation of treatment efficacy. Surg. (United States)155, 615–622 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kirkegård J, Horn T, Christensen SD, Larsen LP, Knudsen AR, M. F. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective definitive treatment option for acute acalculous cholecystitis. Scand. J. Surg.104, 238–243 (2015).

  5. Bergman, S. et al. Recurrence of biliary disease following non-operative management in elderly patients. Surg. Endosc. Other Interv. Tech.29, 3485–3490 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Viste, A., Jensen, D., Angelsen, J. H. & Hoem, D. Percutaneous cholecystostomy in acute cholecystitis; a retrospective analysis of a large series of 104 patients. BMC Surg.15, 2–7 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peters R, Kolderman S, Peters B, Simoens M, B. S. Percutaneous cholecystostomy: single centre experience in 111 patients with an acute cholecystitis. JBR-BTR97, 197–201 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shankar-Hari, Manu, Gary S. Phillips, Mitchell L. Levy, Christopher W. Seymour, Vincent X. Liu, Clifford S. Deutschman, Derek C. Angus, Gordon D. Rubenfeld, and M. S. Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock. JAMA315, 775 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kortram K, de Vries Reilingh TS, Wiezer MJ, van Ramshorst B, B. D. Percutaneous drainage for acute calculous cholecystitis. Surg Endosc25, 3642–3646 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sanjay, P. et al. Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: A multicentre analysis. Hpb15, 511–516 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Akyürek N, Salman B, Yuksel O, Tezcaner T, Irkorucu O, Yucel C, et al. Management of acute calculous cholecystitis in high-risk patients - percutaneous cholecystotomy followed by early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutaneous Tech.15, 315–320 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hatzidakis, A. A. et al. Acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: Percutaneous cholecystostomy vs conservative treatment. Eur. Radiol.12, 1778–1784 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kortram, K. et al. Acute cholecystitis in high risk surgical patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CHOCOLATE trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials13, 7 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bickel A, Hoffman RS, Loberant N, Weiss M, E. A. Timing of percutaneous cholecystostomy affects conversion rate of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc30, 1028–1033 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chou, C. K. et al. Early Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in Severe Acute Cholecystitis Reduces the Complication Rate and Duration of Hospital Stay. Med.94, e1096 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiley, M. Using HIPE data as a research and planning tool: limitations and opportunities: A Response. Ir. J. Med. Sci.174, 52–57 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McHugh SM, Loh KP, Corrigan MA, Sheikh A, Lehane E, H. A. Patientsmate©: the implementation and evaluation of an online prospective audit system. J. Eval. Clin. Pract.18, 365–368 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design—CAF, MI, HMH, RSP, EWMcD

Data collection—CAF, MI, RGK

Data analysis—CAF, MI, HMH

Manuscript preparation and review—CAF, MI, RGK, HMH, RSP, JG, DPB, EWMcD

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina A. Fleming.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fleming, C.A., Ismail, M., Kavanagh, R.G. et al. Clinical and Survival Outcomes Using Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Tube Alone or Subsequent Interval Cholecystectomy to Treat Acute Cholecystitis. J Gastrointest Surg 24, 627–632 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04194-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04194-0

Keywords

Navigation