Abstract
Background
Bundled payments are increasingly becoming common in surgery, yet little is known regarding their potential impact on reimbursements for patients presenting with acute appendicitis. This study examines the financial impact of bundled payments for acute appendicitis.
Methods
This was a retrospective review of all open or laparoscopic appendectomies between July 2014 and June 2017. Patients that were not candidates for surgery were not included in this review.
Results
Of the total 741 patients, 42.1% were diagnosed with complicated acute appendicitis. The median length of stay was 1 day (range, 0 to 21 days). The median hospital cost was $4183 (range, $2075 to $71,023). The 90-day readmission rate was 3.2%, with a mean cost of $5025 per readmission (range, $1595 to $10,795). Length of stay, hospital costs, and 90-day readmissions were significantly higher for complicated versus uncomplicated acute appendicitis. In our current fee-for-service model, hospital reimbursements resulted in margins of − 4.0% to 24.6% depending on the severity of disease. If we assume that bundled payments do not reimburse for readmissions, we estimate that our hospital would incur losses of − 5.7% for patients with acute appendicitis with localized peritonitis and − 20.2% for patients with acute appendicitis with generalized peritonitis.
Conclusions
As bundled payments become more common, hospitals may incur significant losses for acute appendicitis under a model that does not reflect the heterogeneous nature of patients requiring appendectomies. These losses can range up to − 20.2% for complicated cases. Improving clinical outcomes by reducing readmissions may mitigate some of these anticipated losses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services. National Health Expenditure Fact Sheet. https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/statistics-trends-and-reports/nationalhealthexpenddata/nhe-fact-sheet.html. Accessed May 11, 2018.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services. Bundled payments for care improvement (BPCI) initiative: General information. https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/bundled-payments/. Accessed May 11, 2018.
Dundon JM, Bosco J, Slover J, Yu S, Sayeed Y, Iorio R. Improvement in total joint replacement quality metrics: year one versus year three of the bundled payments for care improvement initiative. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016;98(23):1949–1953.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr029.pdf. Accessed May 11, 2018.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) quality indicators–guide to prevention quality indicators: hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Rockvillle, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: 2001 (AHRQ Pub. No 02–R0203)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services. Bundled payments for care improvement initiative (BPCI). https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/bundled-payments-care-improvement-initiative-bpci. Accessed December 18, 2018.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Maryland All-Payer Model. https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/Maryland-All-Payer-Model/. Accessed December 18, 2018.
Collins CM, Davenport DL, Talley CL, Bernard AC. Appendicitis grade, operative duration, and hospital costs. J Am Coll Surg 2018;226:578–583.
Won RP, Friedlander S, Lee SL. Outcomes and costs of managing appendicitis at safety-net hospitals. JAMA Surg 2017;152(11):1001–1006.
Sarda S, Short HL, Hockenberry JM, McCarthy I, Raval MV. Regional variation in rates of pediatric perforated appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 2017;52(9):1488–1491.
Athanasiou C, Lockwood S, Markides GA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: an update of the literature. World J Surg 2017;41(12):3083–3099.
Farach SM, Danielson PD, Walford NE, Harmel RP Jr, Chandler NM. Same–day discharge after appendectomy results in cost savings and improved efficiency. Am Surg 2014;80(8):787–791.
Porter ME and Kaplan RS. How to Pay for Health Care. Harv Bus Rev 2016;94(7–8):88–98,100,134.
Jubelt LE, Goldfeld KS, Blecker SB, Chung WY, Bendo JA, Bosco JA, Errico TJ, Frempong-Boadu AK, Iorio R, Slover JD, Horwitz LI. Early lessons on bundled payment at an Academic Medical Center. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Sep;25(9):654–663.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of John (Marcus) Guy from Anne Arundel Medical Center Department of Surgery and Abigail B. Green from Anne Arundel Medical Center Department of Finance for their help with data retrieval.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors certify that they meet the guidelines of the ICMJE and have made substantial contributions to the conception, design, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Scientific meetings
Podium presentation at the American College of Surgeons 2017 Clinical Congress meeting in San Diego, California, on October 24, 2017.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sibia, U.S., Onayemi, A.O., Turcotte, J.J. et al. Bundled Payments for Appendectomy: a Model of Financial Implications to Institutions. J Gastrointest Surg 24, 643–649 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04181-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04181-5