Skip to main content
Log in

Single-Port Inflatable Mediastinoscopy Combined With Laparoscopic-Assisted Small Incision Surgery for Radical Esophagectomy Is an Effective and Safe Treatment for Esophageal Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

We previously developed a novel non-trans thoracic esophagectomy, the single-port inflatable mediastinoscopy combined with laparoscopy for the radical esophagectomy of esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to report its therapeutic efficacy and safety.

Methods

From May 2016 to August 2017, we have completed 80 cases of radical resection of esophageal carcinoma using this novel surgical technique. The intraoperative findings and postoperative complications were reported.

Results

The operation was successfully performed in all patients except for one patient switched from laparoscopic-assisted operation to open surgery. The mean operation duration was 191.4 ± 27 min, and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 147.3 ± 28.9 mL. The mean number of removed lymph node was 21.9 ± 4.1. Five patients (6.4%) who had preoperative type I respiratory failure needed to stay in the intensive care unit for 24 h postoperatively. Postoperative complications included anastomotic leakage (8.9%), anastomotic stricture (21.25%), pleural effusion (9%), and hoarseness postoperative hoarseness (18.8%). The incidence of hoarseness at 3 months postoperation was reduced to 3.8%. All the complications were Clavien-Dindo grades I–III. There were no perioperative death and postoperative cardiopulmonary complications.

Conclusion

These results showed that the single-port inflatable mediastinoscopy combined with laparoscopy is feasible for radical esophagectomy and possesses good therapeutic efficacy and safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Napier KJ, Scheerer M, Misra S. Esophageal cancer: A Review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, staging workup and treatment modalities. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2014;6:112–120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pakzad R, Mohammadian-Hafshejani A, Khosravi B, Soltani S, Pakzad I, Mohammadian M, Salehiniya H, Momenimovahed Z. The incidence and mortality of esophageal cancer and their relationship to development in Asia. Ann Transl Med 2016;4:29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen W, Zheng R, Zuo T, Zeng H, Zhang S, He J. National cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2012. Chin J Cancer Res 2016;28:1–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359–E386.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pennathur A, Gibson MK, Jobe BA, Luketich JD. Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet 2013;381:400–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sacak B, Orfaniotis G, Nicoli F, Liu EW, Ciudad P, Chen SH, Chen HC. Back-up procedures following complicated gastric pull-up procedure for esophageal reconstruction: Salvage with intestinal flaps. Microsurgery 2016;36:567–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 2012;256:95–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:1887–1892.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Canet J, Gallart L, Gomar C, Paluzie G, Vallès J, Castillo J, Sabaté S, Mazo V, Briones Z, Sanchis J; ARISCAT Group. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary complications in a population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology 2010;113:1338–1350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sengupta S. Post-operative pulmonary complications after thoracotomy. Indian J Anaesth 2015;59:618–626.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Donohoe CL, O’Farrell NJ, Ravi N, Reynolds JV. Evidence-based selective application of transhiatal esophagectomy in a high-volume esophageal center. World J Surg 2012;36:98–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujiwara H, Shiozaki A, Konishi H, Kosuga T, Komatsu S, Ichikawa D, Okamoto K, Otsuji E. Single-Port Mediastinoscopic Lymphadenectomy Along the Left Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;100:1115–1117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujiwara H, Shiozaki A, Konishi H, Komatsu S, Kubota T, Ichikawa D, Okamoto K, Morimura R, Murayama Y, Kuriu Y, Ikoma H, Nakanishi M, Sakakura C, Otsuji E. Hand-assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with a systematic procedure for en bloc infracarinal lymph node dissection. Dis Esophagus 2016;29:131–138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Li GS. Prof. Qingdong Cao: single-port inflatable mediastinoscopy combined with laparoscopy for the radical treatment of esophageal cancer. J Thorac Dis 2016;8:E1108–E1109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanekiyo S, Takeda S, Tsutsui M, Nishiyama M, Kitahara M, Shindo Y, okumitsu Y, Tomochika S, Tokuhisa Y, Iida M, Sakamoto K, Suzuki N, Yamamoto S, Yoshino S, Hazama S, Ueno T, Nagano H. Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2018;32:1945–1953.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamashita K, Watanabe M, Mine S, Toihata T, Fukudome I, Okamura A, Yuda M, Hayami M, Ishizuka N, Imamura Y. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. Surg Endosc 2018 Apr 11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6187-z.[Epubaheadofprint]

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Talents start-up funding of Sun Yat-sen University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingdong Cao.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Li, X., Cheng, H. et al. Single-Port Inflatable Mediastinoscopy Combined With Laparoscopic-Assisted Small Incision Surgery for Radical Esophagectomy Is an Effective and Safe Treatment for Esophageal Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 23, 1533–1540 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-04069-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-04069-w

Keywords

Navigation