Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 640–649 | Cite as

The Effect of Frailty Index on Early Outcomes after Combined Colorectal and Liver Resections

  • Sophia Y. Chen
  • Miloslawa Stem
  • Marcelo Cerullo
  • Susan L. Gearhart
  • Bashar Safar
  • Sandy H. Fang
  • Matthew J. Weiss
  • Jin He
  • Jonathan E. Efron
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Although previous studies have examined frailty as a potential predictor of adverse surgical outcomes, little is reported on its application. We sought to assess the impact of the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI) on morbidity in patients undergoing combined colorectal and liver resections.

Methods

Adult patients who underwent combined colorectal and liver resections were identified using the ACS-NSQIP database (2005–2015). The 5-item mFI consists of history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, and partial/total dependence. Patients were stratified into three groups: mFI 0, 1, or ≥ 2. The impact of the mFI on primary outcomes (30-day overall and serious morbidity) was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Subgroup analyses by age and hepatectomy type was also performed.

Results

A total of 1928 patients were identified: 55.1% with mFI = 0, 33.2% with mFI = 1, and 11.7% with mFI ≥ 2. 75.9% of patients underwent wedge resection/segmentectomy (84.6% colon, 15.4% rectum), and 24.1% underwent hemihepatectomy (88.8% colon, 11.2% rectum). On unadjusted analysis, patients with mFI ≥ 2 had significantly greater rates of overall and serious morbidity, regardless of age and hepatectomy type. These findings were consistent with the multivariable analysis, where patients with mFI ≥ 2 had increased odds of overall morbidity (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02–1.96, p = 0.037) and were more than twice likely to experience serious morbidity (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.47–3.04, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The 5-item mFI is significantly associated with 30-day morbidity in patients undergoing combined colorectal and liver resections. It is a tool that can guide surgeons preoperatively in assessing morbidity risk in patients undergoing concomitant resections.

Keywords

Frailty index Synchronous colorectal liver metastasis Morbidity Mortality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Sophia Y. Chen received financial support from the Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR), funded in part by Grant TL1 TR001078 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the Johns Hopkins ICTR, NCATS or NIH.

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the hospitals participating in the ACS-NSQIP are the source of the data used herein; they have not verified and are not responsible for the statistical validity of the data analysis or the conclusions derived by the authors.

Funding Source

Sophia Y. Chen: Grant Number TL1 TR001078

Author Contributions

Study design: S.Y.C., M.S., J.E.E.

Data acquisition and analysis: S.Y.C., M.S., J.E.E.

Interpretation of data: S.Y.C., M.S., M.C., S.L.G., B.S., S.H.F., M.J.W., J.H., J.E.E.

Drafting work: S.Y.C., M.S., M.C., J.E.E.

Critical revision: S.Y.C., M.S., M.C., S.L.G., B.S., S.H.F., M.J.W., J.H., J.E.E.

Final approval and accountability: S.Y.C., M.S., M.C., S.L.G., B.S., S.H.F., M.J.W., J.H., J.E.E.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Partridge JSL, Harari D, Dhesi JK. Frailty in the older surgical patient: a review. Age Ageing. 2012;41(2):142–147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ronning B, Wyller TB, Seljeflot I, et al. Frailty measures, inflammatory biomarkers and post-operative complications in older surgical patients. Age Ageing. 2010;39(6):758–761.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wen Y, Jabir MA, Dosokey EMG, et al. Using Modified Frailty Index to Predict Safe Discharge Within 48 Hours of Ileostomy Closure. Dis Colon rectum. 2017;60(1):76–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fang ZB, Hu FY, Arya S, Gillespie TW, Rajani RR. Preoperative frailty is predictive of complications after major lower extremity amputation. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(3):804–811.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kolbe N, Carlin AM, Bakey S, Louwers L, Horst HM, Rubinfeld I. Assessing Risk of Critical Care Complications and Mortality in the Elective Bariatric Surgery Population Using a Modified Frailty Index. Obes Surg. 2015;25(8):1401–1407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, et al. Frailty as a Predictor of Surgical Outcomes in Older Patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(6):901–908.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keller DS, Bankwitz B, Nobel T, Delaney CP. Using frailty to predict who will fail early discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery with an established recovery pathway. Dis Colon rectum. 2014;57(3):337–342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Obeid NM, Azuh O, Reddy S, et al. Predictors of critical care-related complications in colectomy patients using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2012;72(4):878–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chow WB, Rosenthal RA, Merkow RP, Ko CY, Esnaola NF. Optimal Preoperative Assessment of the Geriatric Surgical Patient: A Best Practices Guideline from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(4):453–466.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Millikan KW, Staren ED, Doolas A. Invasive therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(1):27–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mcardle C. ABC of colorectal cancer Effectiveness of follow up. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1119069/pdf/1332.pdf. Accessed March 5, 2017.
  12. 12.
    Abdalla EK, Adam R, Bilchik AJ, Jaeck D, Vauthey J-N, Mahvi D. Improving Resectability of Hepatic Colorectal Metastases: Expert Consensus Statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(10):1271–1280.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bolton JS, Fuhrman GM. Survival after resection of multiple bilobar hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2000;231(5):743–751.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hillingsø JG, Wille-Jørgensen P. Staged or simultaneous resection of synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer - a systematic review. Color Dis. 2009;11(1):3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lyass S, Zamir G, Matot I, Goitein D, Eid A, Jurim O. Combined colon and hepatic resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Oncol. 2001;78(1):17–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weber JC, Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, Jaeck D. Simultaneous resection of colorectal primary tumour and synchronous liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2003;90(8):956–962.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reddy SK, Pawlik TM, Zorzi D, et al. Simultaneous Resections of Colorectal Cancer and Synchronous Liver Metastases: A Multi-institutional Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(12):3481–3491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Capussotti L, Ferrero A, Viganò L, Ribero D, Tesoriere R Lo, Polastri R. Major Liver Resections Synchronous with Colorectal Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;14(1):195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mayo SC, Pulitano C, Marques H, et al. Surgical management of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: a multicenter international analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(4):707–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chimukangara M, Frelich M, Bosler M, Rein L, Szabo A, Gould J. A 5-item frailty index based on NSQIP data correlates with morbidity and mortality following paraesopahgeal hernia repair. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2016;30:S219.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henderson WG, Daley J. Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is? Am J Surg. 2009;198(5):S19-S27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    ACS-NSQIP. ACS-NSQIP data collection, analysis, and reporting.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. User Guide for the ACS NSQIP Participant User Data File (PUF). https://www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality programs/nsqip/nsqip_puf_user_guide_2015.ashx. Published 2015. Accessed October 11, 2016.
  24. 24.
    Velanovich V, Antoine H, Swartz A, Peters D, Rubinfeld I. Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: its application to a national database. J Surg Res. 2013;183(1):104–110.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Canadian Study of Health and Aging: study methods and prevalence of dementia. CMAJ. 1994;150(6):899–913.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gani F, Canner JK, Pawlik TM, Z H, I R. Use of the modified Frailty Index in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Improvement Program Database. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(2):205.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rolfson DB, Majumdar SR, Tsuyuki RT, Tahir A, Rockwood K. Validity and reliability of the Edmonton Frail Scale. Age Ageing. 2006;35(5):526–529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Piccirillo JF, Feinstein AR. Clinical symptoms and comorbidity: significance for the prognostic classification of cancer. Cancer. 1996;77(5):834–842.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    de Haas RJ, Adam R, Wicherts DA, et al. Comparison of simultaneous or delayed liver surgery for limited synchronous colorectal metastases. Br J Surg. 2010;97(8):1279–1289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Santibañes E, Lassalle FB, McCormack L, et al. Simultaneous colorectal and hepatic resections for colorectal cancer: postoperative and longterm outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195(2):196–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gani F, Cerullo M, Amini N, et al. Frailty as a predictor of morbidity and mortality following liver surgery. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(4):S1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophia Y. Chen
    • 1
  • Miloslawa Stem
    • 1
  • Marcelo Cerullo
    • 1
  • Susan L. Gearhart
    • 1
  • Bashar Safar
    • 1
  • Sandy H. Fang
    • 1
  • Matthew J. Weiss
    • 1
  • Jin He
    • 1
  • Jonathan E. Efron
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations