Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is pH Testing Necessary Before Antireflux Surgery in Patients with Endoscopic Erosive Esophagitis?

  • 2017 SSAT Plenary Presentation
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Introduction

The relationship between the Los Angeles (LA) grade of esophagitis and acid exposure by pH monitoring is unclear. The aim of this study was to correlate the results of pH testing in patients with esophagitis to determine at what LA grade of esophagitis a pH test is not necessary.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed of the records of all patients who underwent upper endoscopy and were found to have esophagitis graded using the LA system and who had pH monitoring from 2014 to 2016. An abnormal pH test was determined based on the DeMeester score.

Results

There were 56 patients with a median age of 57 years. Esophagitis was LA grade A in 19, B in 20, C in 15 and D in 2 patients. An abnormal pH score was present in 47 patients (84%). All patients with C or D esophagitis had an abnormal pH score compared to 79% and 75% of patients with A and B esophagitis, respectively.

Conclusions

The presence of LA C or D esophagitis was always associated with increased esophageal acid exposure on pH testing and is proof of reflux disease. However, pH testing is recommended prior to antireflux surgery in patients with LA A or B esophagitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, Dent J: Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 2014, 63:871–880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sutton FM, Graham DY, Goodgame RW: Infectious esophagitis. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1994, 4:713–729.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zografos GN, Georgiadou D, Thomas D, Kaltsas G, Digalakis M: Drug-induced esophagitis. Dis Esophagus 2009, 22:633–637.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bredenoord AJ, Hemmink GJ, Smout AJ: Relationship between gastro-oesophageal reflux pattern and severity of mucosal damage. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009, 21:807–812.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bremner RM, Crookes PF, DeMeester TR, Peters JH, Stein HJ: Concentration of refluxed acid and esophageal mucosal injury. Am J Surg 1992, 164:522–526; discussion 526-527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Armstrong D: Endoscopic evaluation of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Yale J Biol Med 1999, 72:93–100.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Dent J, De Dombal FT, Galmiche JP, Lundell L, Margulies M, Richter JE, Spechler SJ, et al: The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 1996, 111:85–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, Blum AL, Armstrong D, Galmiche JP, Johnson F, Hongo M, Richter JE, Spechler SJ, et al: Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut 1999, 45:172–180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Campos GM, Peters JH, DeMeester TR, Oberg S, Crookes PF, Tan S, DeMeester SR, Hagen JA, Bremner CG: Multivariate analysis of factors predicting outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg 1999, 3:292–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ayazi S, Lipham JC, Portale G, Peyre CG, Streets CG, Leers JM, Demeester SR, Banki F, Chan LS, Hagen JA, Demeester TR: Bravo catheter-free pH monitoring: normal values, concordance, optimal diagnostic thresholds, and accuracy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009, 7:60–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boys J AB, Martinez M, Lin B, Oh D, Hagen J, DeMeester S: Is EGD Reporting Adequate: A Review of Reports in 100 Referred Patients (Manuscript in preparation). 2017.

Download references

Acknowledgements

No grant support or other assistance

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors listed above contributed substantially to the conception or design of the work and the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; and all authors contributed to the drafting of the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content and the final approval of the version to be published; and all authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven R. DeMeester.

Ethics declarations

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Southern California.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwameis, K., Lin, B., Roman, J. et al. Is pH Testing Necessary Before Antireflux Surgery in Patients with Endoscopic Erosive Esophagitis?. J Gastrointest Surg 22, 8–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3554-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3554-3

Keywords

Navigation