Abstract
Background
General population screening for colorectal cancer starts at 50, and incidence rates of rectal cancer in patients over 50 years old are decreasing. However, incidence of rectal cancer under age 50 is increasing. This paper analyzes short-and long-term outcomes for rectal cancer patients under 50 years of age.
Methods
Retrospective analyses of consecutive patient cohort, who all received surgical treatment for primary rectal adenocarcinoma at a single institute were used in the study. Outcomes were stratified based on age under or over 50 at the time of surgery.
Results
A total of 582 patients was included, of whom 125 were younger than 50. ASA-score was higher for older patients, with no other significant differences in baseline characteristics. AJCC-staging, based on surgical pathology, differed significantly due to higher stage II-rate in the older group and higher stages III- and IV-rates in the younger group. Percentages of high-grade disease, small vessel-, and perineural invasion were higher for younger patients. Stage-for-stage oncologic survival analyses did not demonstrate a significant difference between younger and older patients. Additionally, an age under/over 50 did not have a significant effect in multivariable analyses for disease free-, and disease specific survival.
Conclusions
Patients who present with rectal cancer under the age of 50 do not seem to have more aggressive disease, while they present with more advanced disease when compared to patients older than 50. Identifying young people at risk of developing rectal cancer and start screening earlier in a selective group might improve disease stage on presentation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2014, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2014/, based on November 2016 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2017.
Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Anderson WF, et al. Colorectal Cancer Incidence Patterns in the United States, 1974–2013. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(8). doi:10.1093/jnci/djw322.
Amri R, Bordeianou LG, Berger DL. The conundrum of the young colon cancer patient. Surgery. 2015;158:1696–1703. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2015.07.018.
O’Connell JB, Maggard MA, Livingston EH, Yo CK. Colorectal cancer in the young. Am J Surg. 2004;187(3):343–348. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.020.
Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, Hosmer DW. Source Code for Biology and Medicine Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med. 2008;3:17. doi:10.1186/1751–0473–3-17.
O’Connell JB, Maggard MA, Liu JH, Etzioni DA, Ko CY. Are survival rates different for young and older patients with rectal cancer? Dis Colon rectum. 2004;47(12):2064–2069. doi:10.1007/s10350-004-0738-1.
Orsini RG, Verhoeven RHA, Lemmens VEPP, et al. Comparable survival for young rectal cancer patients, despite unfavourable morphology and more advanced-stage disease. Eur J Cancer. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.06.005.
You YN, Dozois EJ, Boardman La, Aakre J, Huebner M, Larson DW. Young-Onset Rectal Cancer: Presentation, Pattern of Care and Long-term Oncologic Outcomes Compared to a Matched Older-Onset Cohort. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(9):2469–2476. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1674-7.
Scott RB, Rangel LE, Osler TM, Hyman NH. Rectal cancer in patients under the age of 50 years: The delayed diagnosis. Am J Surg. 2016;211(6):1014–1018. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.031.
Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks J, et al. Perineural invasion is an independent predictor of outcome in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(31):5131–5137. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4949.
Ueno H, Shirouzu K, Eishi Y, et al. Characterization of perineural invasion as a component of colorectal cancer staging. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(10):1542–1549. doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e318297ef6e.
Gomez D, Zaitoun AM, De Rosa A, et al. Critical review of the prognostic significance of pathological variables in patients undergoing resection for colorectal liver metastases. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16(9):836–844. doi:10.1111/hpb.12216.
Lindebjerg J, Osler M, Bisgaard C. Colorectal cancers detected through screening are associated with lower stages and improved survival. Dan Med J. 2014;61(1):1–5.
Davis DM, Marcet JE, Frattini JC, Prather AD, Mateka JJL, Nfonsam VN. Is it time to lower the recommended screening age for colorectal cancer? J Am Coll Surg. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.04.033.
Cha JM, Kozarek RA, La Selva D, et al. Findings of diagnostic colonoscopy in young adults versus findings of screening colonoscopy in patients aged 50 to 54 years: A comparative study stratified by symptom category. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.050.
Koo JE, Kim K-J, Park HW, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasms in Asymptomatic Korean People Between 40 and 49 Years of Age. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;32(iii):98–105. doi:10.1111/jgh.13454.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed substantially to the conception or design of the work or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of the data for this manuscript. Furthermore, all authors drafted or revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version and are in agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Grant Support
AD received a grant from the Michael van Vloten foundation.
Additional information
Scientific meeting presentations:
“Poster of Distinction”—presentation at the Digestive Disease Week May 6–9, 2017, Chicago
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dinaux, A.M., Leijssen, L.G.J., Bordeianou, L.G. et al. Rectal Cancer in Patients Under 50 Years of Age. J Gastrointest Surg 21, 1898–1905 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3525-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3525-8